Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.

Originally posted by Tzeentch
He cares because it's an established fact that s"poor ratings" is the leading cause of death for TV shows.

See: Firefly, etc. for details.

Originally posted by BruceSkywalker

then the ratings should show that...

if this show wants to get better ratings, it NEEDS better acting and storytelling, which it does not have.. perhaps the second half of the season will change that [/B][/QUOTE]

Firely is an example was a great show yet the ratings were bad.

Great show though

http://www.superherohype.com/news/articles/180721-promo-for-episode-11-of-marvels-agents-of-shield looking forward to this, looks like we will finally find out what happen to Coulson.

Originally posted by bats2jm
Thats true but all he does is complain that the show is bad so why watch it and complain and care about the rating

Originally posted by BruceSkywalker

then the ratings should show that...

if this show wants to get better ratings, it NEEDS better acting and storytelling, which it does not have.. perhaps the second half of the season will change that

Firely is an example was a great show yet the ratings were bad. [/B][/QUOTE]

i am going to watch WTF i am going to watch... fact is this show is terrible and people outside of message boards know that due to the show losing ratings each week.. in order for this show to last and be good each week has to do with the actors and the people who are writing it..

Firefly was a great cult show. It had low ratings because there wasn't enough hype and knowledge of the show.

MAOS on the other hand doesn't have that excuse for falling ratings. It had huge hype and ratings for it's first episode due to the hype of being part of the Avengers movie verse.

However , I don't think ratings are that bad for the show. From what I can see the number of viewers are still a lot higher than say Arrow. (Presumably because it's aired on a bigger network).

Originally posted by DARTH POWER
Firefly was a great cult show. It had low ratings because there wasn't enough hype and knowledge of the show.

MAOS on the other hand doesn't have that excuse for falling ratings. It had huge hype and ratings for it's first episode due to the hype of being part of the Avengers movie verse.

However , I don't think ratings are that bad for the show. From what I can see the number of viewers are still a lot higher than say Arrow. (Presumably because it's aired on a bigger network).

Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
Firely is an example was a great show yet the ratings were bad.

i am going to watch WTF i am going to watch... fact is this show is terrible and people outside of message boards know that due to the show losing ratings each week.. in order for this show to last and be good each week has to do with the actors and the people who are writing it..

Originally posted by bats2jm
Everything you said is true I personally dont think the show is bad people just love to complain.

I think people were just expecting better tbh. That's the price Marvel and Whedon will pay for their mega success now. Every time they make something which isn't "amazing" people will complain.

Originally posted by DARTH POWER
I think people were just expecting better tbh. That's the price Marvel and Whedon will pay for their mega success now. Every time they make something which isn't "amazing" people will complain.

Originally posted by bats2jm
Keep watching that will show them how bad a show MAOS is.

OH, its a very bad show, if it were all that it wouldn't lose viewers and ratings each week.. at the very least, ratings would fluctuate each week, but they don't.. that tells me that what little viewers this show has knows and feels it isn't improving.. after the first show which was good, the writing has gotten horrible thus the piss poor acting from the actors/actresses involved. ..

Whedon NEEDS to review each script going forward and make necessary changes.. He sees the ratings numbers every wednesday morning

Originally posted by DARTH POWER
I think people were just expecting better tbh. That's the price Marvel and Whedon will pay for their mega success now. Every time they make something which isn't "amazing" people will complain.

i think for the most part its good complaining and not necessarily bad complaining

Ill say this about the shoe, the woman in the flower dress is still damn fine

People weren't expecting a perfect show, they were expecting a show that wasn't basically 24 minus the badass.

And brown people.

If they wanted the show to be a police procedural, they should have made it more akin to Fringe.

Originally posted by bats2jm
Personally I think people were expecting Avengers on TV

It's nothing to do with that. We don't need superpowers to love a comic book action series- COUGH- ARROW -COUGH

Originally posted by DARTH POWER
It's nothing to do with that. We don't need superpowers to love a comic book action series- COUGH- ARROW -COUGH

Originally posted by Tzeentch
People weren't expecting a perfect show, they were expecting a show that wasn't basically 24 minus the badass.

And brown people.

If they wanted the show to be a police procedural, they should have made it more akin to Fringe.

there isnt anything wrong with procedural shows, considering Castle and Bones are enjoyable. The only problem MAoS has is an underwhelming cast.

Audiences haven't been able to fall in love with these characters - and writing is only part of the problem.

The stories are good and the concept is good - better acting and writing makes this show a HUGE success.

Originally posted by bats2jm
But isn't Green Arrow a superhero non superpower-ed but a superhero nevertheless Shield agents are just smart well train government agents not a apple to apple comparison.

In this case there's a thin line between "superheroes" and just regular "heroes."

Both based on comic book heroes. Neither has actual superpowers, but MAOS actually has the more futuristic and "superhero type" technology.

Originally posted by DARTH POWER
In this case there's a thin line between "superheroes" and just regular "heroes."

Both based on comic book heroes. Neither has actual superpowers, but MAOS actually has the more futuristic and "superhero type" technology.

http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/12/12/will-don-cheadles-war-machine-be-in-avengers-age-of-ultron

Originally posted by bats2jm
http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/12/12/will-don-cheadles-war-machine-be-in-avengers-age-of-ultron

Considering the way he was b**** slapped in IM3, I don't have high hopes for him doing anything noteworthy in Avengers 2.