Again, you all know what Quan's answer would be, and you know he won't change his opinion. Despite that, you make and participate in this bait thread that will assuredly last 20+ pages. LOL at people hypocritically calling Quan a troll when they enjoy trolling him just as much. I'm not saying he isn't a troll, but he's clearly not the only one. The MVF must be in a sad state if making fun of a troll is the most popular thing to do on here.
(directly at all of you, not just Sadako)
Originally posted by Lestov16
Again, you all know what Quan's answer would be, and you know he won't change his opinion. Despite that, you make and participate in this bait thread that will assuredly last 20+ pages. LOL at people hypocritically calling Quan a troll when they enjoy trolling him just as much. I'm not saying he isn't a troll, but he's clearly not the only one. The MVF must be in a sad state if making fun of a troll is the most popular thing to do on here.(directly at all of you, not just Sadako)
Ok,so, when you make 20+ McClane troll threads, intentionally or not, it's ok for you to do so, but as soon as anyone makes a thread involving anyone QuanChi112 has a current love affair with, it is suddenly intolerable?
Lestov, I spoke to you in the general discussion thread about this before, but it appears you have let Sadako and Focus get you down again, so let me make this perfectly clear for you. Quan deserves every bit of ass kicking he gets because he brings it upon himself. What you do however is you tend to sulk when disagreements arise, and you take the bait every time, even knowing when a joke is a joke, and you take it far too literally.
I told you, the Wood Chipper thread, and the McClane is Jesus and god incarnate thing is not something to be taken too literally, you take the piss out of it like I do. Like I said before, McClane is not god, and a lot of that hype is a joke, BUT, there is a thread of legitimacy behind what they are saying, like about the luck thing. That luck is a double edged sword, he IS lucky to get out of the situations he finds himself in alive and with victories, he is however, Unlucky to find himself in those situations to begin with.
Now, with reguards to this thread, I will say that I agree with the majority. Robo's far more accurate with firearms at any distance. And I can go either way with H2H, Khan is very physically strong, but Robo has had some uber durability feats to his name from the movies, especially RC2.
Originally posted by Lestov16
LOL at people hypocritically calling Quan a troll when they enjoy trolling him just as much. I'm not saying he isn't a troll, but he's clearly not the only one.
Confession accepted.
You confuse 'trolling' someone with 'returning their insults and putting them right on their 100% inaccurate claims' in Quanchi's case. He came here to troll and bragged continually about it. Hes fair game, because as mentioned already he totally invites it. His tears are not to become your tears.
😮💨
Originally posted by Lestov16
Thats right motherphuckers. We're doing this, to settle this once and for all..... .........and because we're all bored.Let's go.
Its not.
But your reasoning comes down to little else other than some sort of crush on Van Zan, rather than actual logic /reasoning. And you get real upset when its proven that you lose. You're obsessed by male physique (as an all determining factor in combat, no less! lol) and wondered especially when you get into propositioning posters here, it gets weird and is right to be commented on.
Originally posted by Sadako of GirthZan's fight proves he can whip ass. McClane's history of taking beatdowns is well known. McClane takes another beatdown. Logical.
Its not.
But your reasoning comes down to little else other than some sort of crush on Van Zan, rather than actual logic /reasoning. And you get real upset when its proven that you lose. You're obsessed by male physique (as an all determining factor in combat, no less! lol) and wondered especially when you get into propositioning posters here, it gets weird and is right to be commented on.
Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
Ok,so, when you make 20+ McClane troll threads, intentionally or not, it's ok for you to do so, but as soon as anyone makes a thread involving anyone QuanChi112 has a current love affair with, it is suddenly intolerable?
I would argue that in 20+ page threads such as Bauer vs McClane or whichever, even on the 50th page, a winner is not decided. For instance yes, Sadako, Rob, and others said McClane would win, but Placidity, Darth Martin, and others said Bauer would win. Thus a winner is not decided and it's an argument worth debating (speaking of which, if it is a legit debate, how is it a "troll thread"?). Here though, Khan clearly has no chance, and will never have a chance, so thus any further debate progression is nullified.
Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
Lestov, I spoke to you in the general discussion thread about this before, but it appears you have let Sadako and Focus get you down again, so let me make this perfectly clear for you. Quan deserves every bit of ass kicking he gets because he brings it upon himself.
Uh.....it has nothing to do with Sadako or Focus. Don't know why you think that. I'm just tired of seeing all these Khan and Van Zan threads. There's better characters to debate about. I do agree with you that Quan deserves every bit of spite he generates towards himself.
Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
Like I said before, McClane is not god, and a lot of that hype is a joke, BUT, there is a thread of legitimacy behind what they are saying, like about the luck thing. That luck is a double edged sword, he IS lucky to get out of the situations he finds himself in alive and with victories, he is however, Unlucky to find himself in those situations to begin with.
I know McClane is supernaturally lucky. It's physically impossible how he was able to ram that car off the road or launch the car at the copter. I'm not saying he isn't lucky, but is luck applicable in a versus debate?
Originally posted by Lestov16
Its not about who thinks what, but what the evidence suggests.
And it pointed to McWin. There were more than just those names agreeing with McClane victory, anyway.I know McClane is supernaturally lucky. It's physically impossible how he was able to ram that car off the road or launch the car at the copter. I'm not saying he isn't lucky, but is luck applicable in a versus debate?
That shit wasn't just luck. That was an overide-ing of Physics. The having the ability to play pool with cars and helicopters is a skill.
People talk about McClane's luck all the time as if it was some bilnd thing requiring no skill. If McClane had sat on that roof in Dh1 and just sat there with fingers crossed for lucky things to stop the bomb going off, he'd have been blown up. But McClane makes his own luck by applying skills.
Shooting skills, escapism skills, driving skills, whatever.
Also as pointed out before, the luck gets him in the tight situations in the 1st place too.
The luck is thusly explainable as being fleshing out the frame set out by skill, or maybe McClane DID make a pact at the end of DH1 on that roof.