Kingdom Come Superman Vs Ultraman (DCnU)

Started by Galan0074 pages

Poor analogy, given that the initial buzz around Loeb-Rulk was completely accurate.

Originally posted by Galan007
Poor analogy, given that the initial buzz around Loeb-Rulk was completely accurate.
Incorrect as we still weren't even sure of his powers and Thor beat the snot out of him at the end as did the Hulk. You always jump the gun and are a prisoner of the moment. Digi gets it.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Incorrect as we still weren't even sure of his powers and Thor beat the snot out of him at the end as did the Hulk. You always jump the gun and are a prisoner of the moment. Digi gets it.
😂 Thor didn't 'beat' Rulk until AFTER Loeb left the series. If you're going to try and trash-talk, at least get your facts straight.

Under Loeb, Rulk was unarguably trans-level. Regardless of your beliefs about Ultraman's showing making him a trans-leveler, your analogy was poor.

Originally posted by Galan007
😂 Thor didn't 'beat' Rulk until AFTER Loeb left the series. If you're going to try and trash-talk, at least get your facts straight.

Under Loeb, Rulk was unarguably trans-level.

He beat him in the 6th issue and let the hulk finish him off. You are way off your game. 😂

You want to put everyone there after a few beatdowns while ignoring the characters entire history. I don't judge characters by single arcs Thats your deal. 🙂

I factor all showings into the equation.

Originally posted by quanchi112
He beat him in the 6th issue and let the hulk finish him off. You are way off your game. 😂
No he didn't. You're lying. It was even stated that Thor COULD NOT defeat Rulk in that very same comic. Do I need to post the scans? 🙂

Again, don't try to trash talk when you're horrendously incorrect. Makes you look like even more of an idiot. 👆

Quan, you're gonna let Galan own you like this?

Originally posted by Galan007
No he didn't. It was even stated that Thor COULD NOT defeat Rulk in that very same comic. Do I need to post the scans? 🙂

Again, don't try to trash talk when you're horrendously incorrect. Makes you look like even more of an idiot. 👆

So you bash all you want and then say you'll report.

Post the scans of Rulk admitting Thor had him and that Hulk doesn't have the warrior mentality of Thor. I can still remember it to this day.

Post em. 😄

Originally posted by Mindset
Quan, you're gonna let Galan own you like this?
He's wrong and when he opens the issue and sees it I want a public apology for going maniac on me simply for agreeing with Digi.

Originally posted by quanchi112
So you bash all you want and then say you'll report.

Post the scans of Rulk admitting Thor had him and that Hulk doesn't have the warrior mentality of Thor. I can still remember it to this day.

Post em. 😄

Rulk said that Thor had him on the ropes. This does NOT mean Thor "beat" Rulk on panel, like you said. You LIED about an event to try and make your point seem more substantial. You were caught in your lie and called out on it.

Lies are for the weak, quanch.

Originally posted by Galan007
Rulk said that Thor had him on the ropes. This does NOT mean Thor "beat" Rulk on panel, like you said. You LIED about an event to try and make your point seem more substantial. You were caught in your lie and called out on it.

Lies are for the weak, quanch.

Rulk admitted he had him beat and that Hulk spared him.

You said it was stated that Thor cannot beat Rulk in the same comic. You're the liar not me. So fragile. You really are made of glass sometimes.

In the same arc Thor dominated him after being crushed. Proves you flat out wrong, POTM(prisoner of the moment).

Originally posted by Galan007
No he didn't. You're lying. It was even stated that Thor COULD NOT defeat Rulk in that very same comic. Do I need to post the scans? 🙂

Again, don't try to trash talk when you're horrendously incorrect. Makes you look like even more of an idiot. 👆

Post the scan in issue six which said Thor cannot beat Rulk. Your claim. You have the scans. Let's see em. Don't back down now.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Incorrect as we still weren't even sure of his powers and Thor beat the snot out of him at the end as did the Hulk. You always jump the gun and are a prisoner of the moment. Digi gets it.

They simply will not accept that Thor whooped him at the the height of Rulk's hype. They had it all figured out up until then. It's like the people who say that Sadaam did have WPDs and the world knew it. 😛

Originally posted by Blue Area Vet
They simply will not accept that Thor whooped him at the the height of Rulk's hype. They had is all figured out up until then. It's like the people who say that Sadaam did have WPDs and the world knew it. 😛
I know his hype couldn't even last through the arc. People need a decent body of work before they really want to categorize otherwise it is jumping the gun which I think most agree with.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Rulk admitted he had him beat and that Hulk spared him.

You said it was stated that Thor cannot beat Rulk in the same comic. You're the liar not me. So fragile. You really are made of glass sometimes.

In the same arc Thor dominated him after being crushed. Proves you flat out wrong, POTM(prisoner of the moment).

I said that was stated... Because it WAS stated:
http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/16945743/1.jpg.html

I, unlike yourself, don't purposefully LIE about events just to help my case. 🙂

Originally posted by Galan007
I said that was stated... Because it WAS stated:
http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/16945743/1.jpg.html

I, unlike yourself, don't purposefully LIE about events just to help my case. 🙂

Omg.

😂 😂 😂

Sorry, but this is the Hulk acting like its his right to beat the Rulk not Thors. not like the comic stated Thor cannot beat him here. I'd never even believe someone could interpret it the way you did.

This is too funny. I need to walk away. Can't stop laughing.

Originally posted by Blue Area Vet
They simply will not accept that Thor whooped him at the the height of Rulk's hype. They had it all figured out up until then. It's like the people who say that Sadaam did have WPDs and the world knew it. 😛
I'm not saying Thor couldn't have beaten Rulk had the battle lasted longer. I'm saying that he didn't actually "beat" Rulk, like quanchi tried to lie about. 🙂

Originally posted by quanchi112
Omg.

😂 😂 😂

Sorry, but this is the Hulk acting like its his right to beat the Rulk not Thors. not like the comic stated Thor cannot beat him here. I'd never even believe someone could interpret it the way you did.

This is too funny. I need to walk away. Can't stop laughing.

That's what A-Bomb ascertained, yes. However, the comment was still made, like I said. 👆

You, on the other hand, outright LIED about an event(Thor did not "beat" Rulk, like you said.) You were caught. The fact that you cannot simply admit you were wrong truly IS hilarious. 👆

Originally posted by Galan007
Projection is funny. 👆

You lied about an event(Thor did not "beat" Rulk, like you said.) You were caught. The fact that you cannot simply admit you were wrong truly IF hilarious. 👆

Let us examine this further. By your scan you are saying no one else in comics could best the Rulk save the Hulk. It doesn't even apply to Thor if we take it at face value. Rulk later admits Thor had him. Thor crushed him and the Hulk jumped in to finish him off.

You said in the entire arc he was this formidable but by the end Thor and the Hulk both sonned him. I think you know what just happened here today. Just don't jump the gun in the future. K. Have a blessed evening.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Let us examine this further. By your scan you are saying no one else in comics could best the Rulk save the Hulk. It doesn't even apply to Thor if we take it at face value. Rulk later admits Thor had him. Thor crushed him and the Hulk jumped in to finish him off.
Read.Compute.Comprehend:
Originally posted by Galan007
I'm not saying Thor couldn't have beaten Rulk had the battle lasted longer. I'm saying that he didn't actually "beat" Rulk, like quanchi tried to lie about. 🙂
Originally posted by Galan007
That's what A-Bomb ascertained, yes. However, the comment was still made, like I said. 👆

You, on the other hand, outright LIED about an event(Thor did not "beat" Rulk, like you said.) You were caught. The fact that you cannot simply admit you were wrong truly IS hilarious. 👆

Originally posted by quanchi112
You said in the entire arc he was this formidable but by the end Thor and the Hulk both sonned him. I think you know what just happened here today. Just don't jump the gun in the future. K. Have a blessed evening.
Loeb Rulk beat Uatu, the Grandmaster, Surfer and Thor(among several others.) The initial hype about him WAS accurate. 🙂

Anywho, you said Thor actually "beat" Rulk under Loeb, which is a blatant LIE. He NEVER did. You were caught on this LIE, and destroyed accordingly. Why? Because you lack the maturity to simply admit that you goofed up.

Always a pleasure. 👆

Originally posted by Galan007
Read.Compute.Comprehend:

Loeb Rulk beat Uatu, the Grandmaster, Surfer and Thor(among several others.) The initial hype about him WAS accurate. 🙂

Anywho, you said Thor actually "beat" Rulk under Loeb, which is a blatant LIE. He NEVER did. You were caught on this LIE, and destroyed accordingly. Why? Because you lack the maturity to simply admit that you goofed up.

Always a pleasure. 👆

Again, it was a naive Surfer, Thor destroyed him the second time around and the Hulk wrecked him too. The hype died down by the end of the arc and got much worse which is another indicator one arc isn't a true indicator by any means let alone a characters introductory arc.

I agreed with Digi and didn't even address you directly because you tend to report those who disagree with you. I was right that by the end of his first arc he got brought down to size in one issue no less.

Live long and prosper.