Jensaarai1's accuracy

(If you watch him) How accurate do you think his Versus video's are? I'd like your opinion on this, guys.

He says Vader>Yoda, then Kun>Vader.

That should tell you everything.

His videos are interesting, but I disagree with him quite a lot.

I don't like his propaganda.

Originally posted by Intrepid37
He says Vader>Yoda, then Kun>Vader.

That should tell you everything.

But he backs it up with good arguments.

He talks too much, his videos would be better if he reduced them to 5 minutes.

Originally posted by Allankles
He talks too much, his videos would be better if he reduced them to 5 minutes.

That shouldn't take more than 5 minutes, he ends up talking too much.
The permutations of each battle are also deeper than he suggests and he breaks everything down in a one sided way- calling Yoda's ataru application 'basic'. calling Vodo weak against staffs - the main reason he lost to Kun was because he couldn't believe he'd trained such a brutish apprentice.

As I said there's more to the Jedi he talks about than he indicates, yet he peddles his opinions as law. Cut it to 5 minutes and the vids would be better.

Originally posted by Jmanghan
But he backs it up with good arguments.

His arguments often reach for conclusions and ignore vital information. His Asajj Ventress vs Sedriss video was ridiculous in my estimation.

Originally posted by Allankles
That shouldn't take more than 5 minutes, he ends up talking too much.
The permutations of each battle are also deeper than he suggests and he breaks everything down in a one sided way- calling Yoda's ataru application 'basic'. calling Vodo weak against staffs - the main reason he lost to Kun was because he couldn't believe he'd trained such a brutish apprentice.

As I said there's more to the Jedi he talks about than he indicates, yet he peddles his opinions as law. Cut it to 5 minutes and the vids would be better.

Kun is beyond Vader in every sense of the word, he's comparable to Sidious in my opinion.

Kun was ok, powerful but childish. He only became a legend because of the power he was blessed with, otherwise he was an epic failure.

Originally posted by Allankles
Kun was ok, powerful but childish. He only became a legend because of the power he was blessed with, otherwise he was an epic failure.

We can agree upon him being above Vader in Sheer Combat ability though, right?

Yes he would be better fighter than the old cyborg Vader.

Originally posted by Allankles
Yes he would be better fighter than the old cyborg Vader.

To be fair, if Anakin didn't get those injuries, he would've killed Sidious eventually.

I was unfamiliar and was going to check them out, but 45 minutes to an hour discussing one-on-one fights? Yikes!

Originally posted by Jmanghan
Kun is beyond Vader in every sense of the word, he's comparable to Sidious in my opinion.

Kun is a better Sith Lord than Anakin/Vader. Vader was submissive, crippled by guilt, and given to great remorse. He was a servant for 20-30 years. By Sith ideals, Kun was better.

Originally posted by Q99
I was unfamiliar and was going to check them out, but 45 minutes to an hour discussing one-on-one fights? Yikes!

I listened to them while I was playing TOR, or typing up replies here.

I skipped to the end of the few- judging *just* by the conclusions, they aren't too bad, though I agree the result of Asajj vs Sedriss was silly.

You should listen to his lightsaber argument for Sedriss. He forced Luke to resort to the Force to beat him through sheer lightsaber skiilz and is just a physical tank because he has a 16 in constitution in the RPG guide.

16 Constitution is like +3 hp. Monstrous!