Originally posted by Allankles
That shouldn't take more than 5 minutes, he ends up talking too much.
The permutations of each battle are also deeper than he suggests and he breaks everything down in a one sided way- calling Yoda's ataru application 'basic'. calling Vodo weak against staffs - the main reason he lost to Kun was because he couldn't believe he'd trained such a brutish apprentice.As I said there's more to the Jedi he talks about than he indicates, yet he peddles his opinions as law. Cut it to 5 minutes and the vids would be better.
Beg your pardon but no, Jensaarai does not "peddle his opinions as law." He clearly states that the videos are just his opinion and encourages people to say if and why they think otherwise. At no point does he say or imply "this is how it WILL go because I say so."
Anyway, I adore watching his videos because they're (a lot) more than five minutes. They have to be long because there's so much fascinating content and analysis. I don't think I have ever seen anyone put so much thought into "VS" videos before (except maybe the Death Battle people) and that's why they're a joy to watch.
And personally I think they're very accurate.
Originally posted by Intrepid37
He says Vader>Yoda, then Kun>Vader.That should tell you everything.
Indeed. That tells me he actually thinks about how the fight would go and comes to a conclusion. That's much better than someone who just goes "dur, Yoda wins because he's Yoda, dur."
Originally posted by Stealth Moose
Kun is a better Sith Lord than Anakin/Vader. Vader was submissive, crippled by guilt, and given to great remorse. He was a servant for 20-30 years. By Sith ideals, Kun was better.
No, he would defeat Vader in single combat, no question, Jedi at Vader's CURRENT level, or Sith at Vader's CURRENT level, Vader loses either one.
What destructive damage has Kun managed with his blasts outside power enhancing temples? Vader has superior physical feats; he's not slow by any means. Not only would it be hard for Kun to hit Vader with it, it would be extremely complicated and dangerous for him to take down Vader with it who boasts incredibly high pain insurance and durability And then, when was the last time Kun engaged an opponent only to fire an infinite amount of blasts at his opponent? To my knowledge, he has ony done this outside the temples against Aleema Keto, and he only blasted her into unconscious with it. Vodo-Siosk Baas and Uliq-Qel Droma, he dueled. Not to mention, Vader is the more skilled swordsman and, as a pure telekinetic, he outshines Kun by miles. Drain? Vader knows how to defend against the Dark Reaper, so this would not give Kun any neccesary advantage.
Originally posted by Intrepid37
What destructive damage has Kun managed with his blasts outside power enhancing temples?
I don't believe anyone has established that the temple would effect the amulets. Moose did a rather convincing breakdown of why this wouldn't be the case.
Originally posted by Intrepid37
Vader has superior physical feats; he's not slow by any means.
But he is unwieldy and ponderous. I sincerely don't see him avoiding Kun's blasts, which are rather large.
Originally posted by Intrepid37
Not only would it be hard for Kun to hit Vader with it, it would be extremely complicated and dangerous for him to take down Vader with it who boasts incredibly high pain insurance and durability.
'Complicated and dangerous'? Lmao, all he has to do is blast him until he dies. Oh yes, so complex!
It wouldn't be hard for him to hit at all. Vader is a huge lumbering douche. He's not avoiding shit.
Originally posted by Intrepid37
And then, when was the last time Kun engaged an opponent only to fire an infinite amount of blasts at his opponent?
That's irrelevant. When was the last time Sidious opened up a fight with lightning? That wouldn't stop us from arguing that he's pwn Vader with lightning in a fight. Kun has the ability to spam amulet blasts so we can argue that he can do that.
Originally posted by Intrepid37
Not to mention, Vader is the more skilled swordsman and, as a pure telekinetic, he outshines Kun by miles. Drain? Vader knows how to defend against the Dark Reaper, so this would not give Kun any neccesary advantage.
Again, irrelevant.
Originally posted by Jmanghan
Then - To be used for any source of time.Than - Used for everything else. 😛
Maybe I overreacted e.e
I don't believe you're correct there. "Than" would be used in sentences like:
"Come on, you can do better than that."
or
"Seriously? You're better than this!"
It's usually used in the making of comparison, while "Then" would be used in a sentence like:
"Then you are nothing!"
or
"What is this, then?"
Seemingly used in a fashion of "effect to a cause". (I can't think of a better way to describe.)
Or perhaps I'm flat out wrong about my theory there. But I do know that "than" was not what you were supposed to use, there.