Iron man vs Superman

Started by -Pr-7 pages
Originally posted by carver9
From what I am seeing, people dont know what Ironman has done prep wise.

lol, your hate is strong.

Originally posted by Batman-Prime
You mean, getting prepped and get stomped, like against WWH, King Thor etc?

He would have defeated Hulk but someone tampered with his armor and removed fhe nanites (which would take Superman out). That armor he used against Hulk was destroying mountains and wrecking nearby cities.

Originally posted by carver9
He would have defeated Hulk but someone tampered with his armor and removed fhe nanites (which would take Superman out). That armor he used against Hulk was destroying mountains and wrecking nearby cities.

So under the same conditions he would have got an even worse beating from Superman then Hulk 👆 .

Originally posted by -Pr-
lol, your hate is strong.

Has nothing go do with hate. Ironman damaged fhe Phoenix with his prep. Gave King Thor a fight while siphoning his power. These are skyfather level beings. I stand by my statement.

Originally posted by Batman-Prime
So under the same conditions he would have got an even worse beating from Superman then Hulk 👆 .

Disagree. Ironman was doing some insane stuff during that fight...lot of power displayed. Superman would beat him in that armor (if IM doesn't have his nanites) but he would have to bring his game imo just like Hulk did. WWH had to go Into a complete rage to damage that armor.

Stark wins.

A great character with a really long career vs. a parody by dcnu. Little feats nupes has will get reset anyway, that's how dc rolls.

Originally posted by carver9
Has nothing go do with hate. Ironman damaged fhe Phoenix with his prep. Gave King Thor a fight while siphoning his power. These are skyfather level beings. I stand by my statement.

You acting like people siding against your Marvel character means they haven't done the research, is hateful. And biased.

Don't apply bad logic to this. Try breaking the cycle for once.

Originally posted by carver9
He would have defeated Hulk but someone tampered with his armor and removed fhe nanites (which would take Superman out). That armor he used against Hulk was destroying mountains and wrecking nearby cities.

So had the nanites not been removed....Iron Man would've won?

IOW, his prep was enough to take WWH out?

If yes, then I was right, and PIS meant that WWH won.

If no, then add it to the list of failed armours that IM thought he had prepped with.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
So had the nanites not been removed....Iron Man would've won?

IOW, his prep was enough to take WWH out?

If yes, then I was right, and PIS meant that WWH won.

If no, then add it to the list of failed armours that IM thought he had prepped with.

I already admitted a long time ago that WWH would have lost that battle if the nanites would have worked. Ironman had that fight in the bag and yes, nanites would have worked on WWH.

Yes, Tony prepped good enough to take Hulk out, hell, his prep took out WBH.

Yeah, during THAT instance, PIS did help Hulk which is the main reason Tony suit was hacked in the first place...to keep the story going. The suit alone was formidable enough to contend with Heralds/trans, he tailor made it as a "just in case" with nanites because he knew punching and blasting this version of Hulk wouldn't work.

The adamantium spike Ironman had on him is enough to kill Superman...this isn't even including the injection of Nanites thats implanted inside the spike.

Originally posted by -Pr-
You acting like people siding against your Marvel character means they haven't done the research, is hateful. And biased.

Don't apply bad logic to this. Try breaking the cycle for once.

Really? Just because I think Ironman can take out Heralds in the right suit is me siding with Marvel? The guy took out/damaged/gave a good fight against skyfathers and high trans with his prep. Don't get what the issue is. Without prep and standard armor, IM WILL lose.

With prep, Tony prep, the second or 3rd smartest man on the planet, Ironman can win.

Originally posted by carver9
I already admitted a long time ago that WWH would have lost that battle if the nanites would have worked. Ironman had that fight in the bag and yes, nanites would have worked on WWH.

Yes, Tony prepped good enough to take Hulk out, hell, his prep took out WBH.

Yeah, during THAT instance, PIS did help Hulk which is the main reason Tony suit was hacked in the first place...to keep the story going. The suit alone was formidable enough to contend with Heralds/trans, he tailor made it as a "just in case" with nanites because he knew punching and blasting this version of Hulk wouldn't work.

The adamantium spike Ironman had on him is enough to kill Superman...this isn't even including the injection of Nanites thats implanted inside the spike.

👆 You and me, carver, against the world.

You seem to be ignoring any prep from Superman, however. His tech would dwarf Iron Man's, which as Guardians of the Galaxy has shown is pretty poor compared to galactic tech (Rocket Racooon is always saying how sh!t it is).

Originally posted by carver9
Really? Just because I think Ironman can take out Heralds in the right suit is me siding with Marvel? The guy took out/damaged/gave a good fight against skyfathers and high trans with his prep. Don't get what the issue is. Without prep and standard armor, IM WILL lose.

With prep, Tony prep, the second or 3rd smartest man on the planet, Ironman can win.

I never said that.

Your assertion that people saying Superman would win means that they didn't research Iron Man, is the problem.

You do this in plenty of threads.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
👆 You and me, carver, against the world.

You seem to be ignoring any prep from Superman, however. His tech would dwarf Iron Man's, which as Guardians of the Galaxy has shown is pretty poor compared to galactic tech (Rocket Racooon is always saying how sh!t it is).

Look on the first page...I said Superman would win that as well. I think Ironman could win...it depends.

Originally posted by -Pr-
I never said that.

Your assertion that people saying Superman would win means that they didn't research Iron Man, is the problem.

You do this in plenty of threads.

I gave Superman the win though...people saying that Ironman only prep is the Hulkbuster, etc was wrong but I also get what you are saying.

Imagine what a punch that KO'd the Hulk would do to nupes.

It'd probably disintegrate him or something, considering he got one-shotted by the man whose favorite way of travel is by riding a seahorse.

Wait. Is this DCNU Supes? If so, this changes things, drastically.

To quote Bada, "always current versions unless specified otherwise in the OP".

Originally posted by carver9
Wait. Is this DCNU Dupes? If so, this changes things, drastically.

no, it really doesn't.

Originally posted by carver9
Has nothing go do with hate. Ironman damaged fhe Phoenix with his prep. Gave King Thor a fight while siphoning his power. These are skyfather level beings. I stand by my statement.

I'd like to see someone disagree with this. let's not forget that he was the one that depowered wwh.

Originally posted by Cogito
Putting aside what Tony could hypothetically do with prep, what has he actually done that would beat Superman for a majority?
Up until now nothing, but he's never faced Superman to have to had done something, but if he had to face him and had time to prepare. Superman would have one hell of a fight on his hands.