Majestic VS Gladiator: TO THE DEATH!

Originally posted by ODG
Causing a landslide to fall on Gladiator will be ineffective since he can fly over it.

Other than demonstrating far greater energy durability and striking power on-panel.

I understand your opinion isn't actually based on comics, so I'm not offended.

Based on canon answer the following.

Does Kallark usually have the advantage of superior aggression against his opponents?

Does Kallark predominately have greater speed than his opponents?

Does Gladiator have superior combat skill than his opponents?

Does Gladiator possess more experience in combat than his foes?

Despite my opinion not" Actually" being based on comics, the correct answer to the aforementioned questions is, yes.

Now, would any of those advantages be present against Majestros?

^ Trying to move the goalposts is pretty much the surest way for you to indirectly admit you were talking out of your butt at first.

Originally posted by ODG
^ Trying to move the goalposts is pretty much the surest way for you to indirectly admit you were talking out of your butt at first.

Majestic is winning by a landslide.

Kallark has no advantage over Majestic.

NONE.

This is what I stated a few posts earlier.

By any reasonable standard of rationality there is no qualification to my earlier statement.

Given that reality how am I "Trying to move the goalposts"?

Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn
Majestic is winning by a landslide.

Kallark has no advantage over Majestic.

NONE.

Why would you make a thread if you think it is spite?

Originally posted by carver9
Why would you make a thread if you think it is spite?

You don't know what the term means.

Majestros earns every victory in a hard-fought manner but he still wins. It is comprable to many real life rivalries where individuals and or teams are pushed to the limit but ultimately prevail.

If Majestic hits something once with the creation blades there as good as dead right?

Originally posted by ShadowFyre
If Majestic hits something once with the creation blades there as good as dead right?

It depends on the character's healing factor and invulnerability.

Whatever they touch is being cut though.

Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn
[B]Majestic is winning by a landslide.

Kallark has no advantage over Majestic.

NONE.

This is what I stated a few posts earlier.[/b]

Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn
By any reasonable standard of rationality there is no qualification to my earlier statement.

Given that reality how am I "Trying to move the goalposts"?

Somehow you start asking questions that don't even address the facts that Gladiator has demonstrated far greater energy durability and striking power than Majestic. Facts which completely disprove your original argument. But you'd rather prattle on about pretty much everything else but that and act like you aren't trying to backtrack to something altogether separate.

You made an exclusive statement. One that is erroneous. Now you don't want to talk about it. Except you're acting like you never stopped. Never seen that maneuver before.

Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn
It depends on the character's healing factor and invulnerability.

Whatever they touch is being cut though.

Ok. So they just cut through anything. That still sounds like an extremely unfair advantage. If im fighting myself and I have two swords that can cut anything and the other me doesent. Thats not very fair. I used this analogy because I see glads and majestros comparable in speed and strenght and skill.

Originally posted by Galan007
Majestic. Every single time.

👆

Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn
It depends on the character's healing factor and invulnerability.

Whatever they touch is being cut though.

Ok. So they just cut through anything. That still sounds like an extremely unfair advantage. If im fighting myself and I have two swords that can cut anything and the other me doesent. Thats not very fair. I used this analogy because I see glads and majestros comparable in speed and strenght and skill.

Also I'm not sure why anybody thinks Majestic's durability is lower than ****ing Gladiator's due to him changing his physical structure to proto-neutronium when he was going to be in there for weeks?

Gladiator was at the limits of his durability under a star in far less time.

http://i647.photobucket.com/albums/uu200/biensalsa/Marvel%20Comics/MCP-49-26_zps4317d8d9.jpg
http://i647.photobucket.com/albums/uu200/biensalsa/Marvel%20Comics/MCP-49-27_zps9446ddd8.jpg

Originally posted by ODG
No sh1t, sherlock. We can all read. Most of us anyway. Apparently not you, though.

Somehow you start asking questions that don't even address the facts that Gladiator has demonstrated far greater energy durability and striking power than Majestic. Facts which completely disprove your original argument. But you'd rather prattle on about pretty much everything else but that and act like you aren't trying to backtrack to something altogether separate.

You made an exclusive statement. One that is erroneous. Now you don't want to talk about it. Except you're acting like you never stopped. Never seen that maneuver before.

Since my statement is so blatantly erroneous you can feel free to provide proof of how false it is.

I expect your response will be something along the lines of "Not wanting to do my work for me" or some such inane excuse.

Originally posted by ShadowFyre
Ok. So they just cut through anything. That still sounds like an extremely unfair advantage. If im fighting myself and I have two swords that can cut anything and the other me doesent. Thats not very fair. I used this analogy because I see glads and majestros comparable in speed and strenght and skill.

Majestros doesn't have any weapons here, not the Kusar or Creation blades.

He doesn't need them against Kallark.

Oh. Guess I misread.

Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn
Since my statement is so blatantly erroneous you can feel free to provide proof of how false it is.

Originally posted by ODG
Other than demonstrating far greater energy durability and striking power on-panel.

Originally posted by ODG
you start asking questions that don't even address the facts that Gladiator has demonstrated far greater energy durability and striking power than Majestic. Facts which completely disprove your original argument.

N1gga, please.

Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn
I expect your response will be something along the lines of "Not wanting to do my work for me" or some such inane excuse.

Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn
Majestros doesn't have any weapons here, not the Kusar or Creation blades.

He doesn't need them against Kallark.

👆

Originally posted by ODG
You're pleading ignorance? Let's use some pretty colors where I basically typed out two advantages that Gladiator has over Majestic, which disproves your assertion that Kallark has no advantages over Majestic: Now you can completely ignore that Majestic had to convert his body to proto-neutronium to withstand diving into the Sun whereas Gladiator has dove into stars on his own and that Gladiator has proven to be able to shatter a planet with his fists and Majestic hasn't, but let's not pretend that there is even a single person on these forums who doesn't know these Gladiator feats based on the number of times carver9 has invoked them.

N1gga, please. Oddly enough, I have come to expect absolutely nothing from you.

Let me dumb it down further as to reach your level.

None. Of. What. You. Posted. Gives. Gladiator. A. Victory. Over. Majestic.

Now insert your pathetic ad hominem attack and ignore the question put toward you.

The idiot actually thinks Majestros ability to convert his molecular structure is a negative.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I don't want to close this because you all can't be civil to one another. So drop it, guys.