Supernova goes off, what happens?

Started by Endless Mike13 pages
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
Could you give me link to the calculation or post it here?

https://www.fanverse.org/blogs/fantastic-four-bit-feats-the-third-part-2-final-tally.19953/

Originally posted by Endless Mike
https://www.fanverse.org/blogs/fantastic-four-bit-feats-the-third-part-2-final-tally.19953/

Thanks !!! 👆

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
Hmmm, I'm not sure about it implies gradual destruction from what I read.

For example

"The Radiant proved stronger and revailed over Doomsday in [B]*a final blast of pure energy that laid waste a fifth of calaton* "
https://ibb.co/ncfpVm2

That definitely sounds like it was done in one attack.

Regardless, JBL probably wouldn't accept Superman could withstood-billions-of planets-every-second-destroying power or Kryptoanins are that fast.

Gladiator(Reed case) and Superman(Mageddon)'s both are reliable. The major problem, again, is at some certain posters here I believe *shrug* [/B]

Not one of them can lay waste to a universe in one or one hundred trillion hits. That's classic beyonder class. It means they can destroy universes over a period of time. I can take a flame thrower and lay waste to a trailer park but it will take me a while unless the police stop me. Same as superman saying he has to stop them.

Originally posted by JBL
Not one of them can lay waste to a universe in one or one hundred trillion hits. That's classic beyonder class. It means they can destroy universes over a period of time. I can take a flame thrower and lay waste to a trailer park but it will take me a while unless the police stop me. Same as superman saying he has to stop them.

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
And this also applies to Gladitor's star collapsing/black hole tearing statements. Gladitor could be collapsing a star by using specific equipments or he needs an extended time to collapse one

Black hole statements also could be argued it was made by Kid Gladiator, who, well, not the best candidate for credible source as DS pointed out years ago

Oh, BTW, looks like you were wrong again

Originally posted by Endless Mike
I was basing it more on the capability to destroy half the solar system. Anyway I found my calc, it came out to about 23% as powerful as a low-end supernova.
Originally posted by JBL
Not one of them can lay waste to a universe in one or one hundred trillion hits. That's classic beyonder class. It means they can destroy universes over a period of time. I can take a flame thrower and lay waste to a trailer park but it will take me a while unless the police stop me. Same as superman saying he has to stop them.

Assuming 100 billion planets per galaxy, and 100 billion galaxies in the universe (which is probably a huge underestimate), in order to destroy all the planets in 1000 years (and they're probably talking about a much shorter timeframe here), they would have to destroy over 300 billion planets per second (which is over 3 galaxies worth of planets).

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
Oh, BTW, looks like you were wrong again

I think the neutron star statement is more reliable though, as it came from a servant of the Living Tribunal.

Originally posted by Endless Mike
I think the neutron star statement is more reliable though, as it came from a servant of the Living Tribunal.

Perhaps, but I think an argument could be made that Superman was so sure about their capabilities that he willingly killed them by using kryptonite, even after their powers were deprived by gold kryptonite

IOW, Superman willingly to kill three helpless persons because he so sure what they could've done if they restored their full powers

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
Perhaps, but I think an argument could be made that Superman was so sure about their capabilities that he willingly killed them by using kryptonite, even after their powers were deprived by gold kryptonite

IOW, Superman willingly to kill three helpless persons because he so sure what they could've done if they restored their full powers

I was talking in relation to the Kid Gladiator black hole statement. I agree that one is rather questionable, but the neutron star statement is more reliable.

Originally posted by Endless Mike
I was talking in relation to the Kid Gladiator black hole statement. I agree that one is rather questionable, but the neutron star statement is more reliable.

Oh, sorry I misunderstood your post. And yeah, I also agree star-collapsing statement is more reliable than the black hole statement

Originally posted by JBL
Not one of them can lay waste to a universe in one or one hundred trillion hits. That's classic beyonder class. It means they can destroy universes over a period of time. I can take a flame thrower and lay waste to a trailer park but it will take me a while unless the police stop me. Same as superman saying he has to stop them.

Head canon? So you lied just like you lied about me. Thanks for admitting you're a little bitch, your consolation prize isn not in the mail. Because you lost too badly to get one.

Originally posted by Delta1938
Head canon? So you lied just like you lied about me. Thanks for admitting you're a little bitch, your consolation prize isn not in the mail. Because you lost too badly to get one.
lol. You lost. Get over it. How much power did you think it took to annihilate half the solar system from out near Pluto. Use your brain sometimes.

Originally posted by JBL
lol. You lost. Get over it. How much power did you think it took to annihilate half the solar system from out near Pluto. Use your brain sometimes.

Originally posted by Endless Mike
I was basing it more on the capability to destroy half the solar system. Anyway I found my calc, it came out to about 23% as powerful as a low-end supernova.
Originally posted by JBL
lol. You lost. Get over it. How much power did you think it took to annihilate half the solar system from out near Pluto. Use your brain sometimes.

So nothing but head canon on the Pocketverse Kryptonians.

Nothing but a lie about me jumping on the bandwagon. Maybe you read something I said that I forgot? Well if you did you'd actually have it. But your response to qwerty proves you're lying.

And no response to DS asking you what specifically you read to think Mageddon was debunked. The fact you told him to do his own research proves how retarded you are. Either you're too stupid to know it's your job to prove your claims, or you're caught lying and stupid enough to think he'll buy he's supposed to do your job for.

JBL must stand for Justa' Lying Bitch. You're are taking the L like you take the D. Screaming and fighting and in denial.

Originally posted by Delta1938
So nothing but head canon on the Pocketverse Kryptonians.

Nothing but a lie about me jumping on the bandwagon. Maybe you read something I said that I forgot? Well if you did you'd actually have it. But your response to qwerty proves you're lying.

And no response to DS asking you what specifically you read to think Mageddon was debunked. The fact you told him to do his own research proves how retarded you are. Either you're too stupid to know it's your job to prove your claims, or you're caught lying and stupid enough to think he'll buy he's supposed to do your job for.

JBL must stand for Justa' Lying Bitch. You're are taking the L like you take the D. Screaming and fighting and in denial.

You're an idiot. Research means not taking my word and looking it up yourself. Just like when you superman fans lied about superman destroying a multiverse by punching WF and people that actually know how to comprehend a feat told y'all he didn't, I looked it up for myself and found out you superman fans were lying, some were mistaken and backed off the lie. Now, pluto is where in the solar system? Half the solar system near Pluto covers a lot of distance. Now take our sun, if it went nova, what kind of destruction would it cause? Again, use your brain. Smh.

Originally posted by JBL
You're an idiot. Research means not taking my word and looking it up yourself. Just like when you superman fans lied about superman destroying a multiverse by punching WF and people that actually know how to comprehend a feat told y'all he didn't, I looked it up for myself and found out you superman fans were lying, some were mistaken and backed off the lie. Now, pluto is where in the solar system? Half the solar system near Pluto covers a lot of distance. Now take our sun, if it went nova, what kind of destruction would it cause? Again, use your brain. Smh.

Like I said, I calculated it at around 0.23 FOE, which is less than a quarter of a supernova, but Gladiator has better feats than that, for example destroying a neutron star requires as much power as hundreds of supernovae.

Originally posted by JBL
You're an idiot. Research means not taking my word and looking it up yourself. Just like when you superman fans lied about superman destroying a multiverse by punching WF and people that actually know how to comprehend a feat told y'all he didn't, I looked it up for myself and found out you superman fans were lying, some were mistaken and backed off the lie. Now, pluto is where in the solar system? Half the solar system near Pluto covers a lot of distance. Now take our sun, if it went nova, what kind of destruction would it cause? Again, use your brain. Smh.

So again a bunch of nonsense you hope will distract from the fact you're a lying bitch. That's not how it works, retard. He checked to verify your claims, not does your research for you. You don't have any actual reason to say it was debunked.

Given your track record I'm sure you're just lying and greedily sucked the dick of whoever gave you something to argue against a feat you don't like

And still nothing to support you saying I hoped on the bandwagon. I'm gonna bet you didn't see anything and just assumed because you're an inbred loser. Why don't you just admit you lied? You digging yourself deeper is just digging yourself deeper.

I, using my brain, can tell you that the Sun going nova is far far beyond a supernova because it's not a nova. If you had a functional brain to use you never would have thought "there's no star" was anything but retardation. But then since you are retarded, that's why you didn't realize it.

Thanks for proving you have nothing yet again. I'd think you'd get tired of showing how stupid you are.

Originally posted by Delta1938
So again a bunch of nonsense you hope will distract from the fact you're a lying bitch. That's not how it works, retard. He checked to verify your claims, not does your research for you. You don't have any actual reason to say it was debunked.

Given your track record I'm sure you're just lying and greedily sucked the dick of whoever gave you something to argue against a feat you don't like

And still nothing to support you saying I hoped on the bandwagon. I'm gonna bet you didn't see anything and just assumed because you're an inbred loser. Why don't you just admit you lied? You digging yourself deeper is just digging yourself deeper.

I, using my brain, can tell you that the Sun going nova is far far beyond a supernova because it's not a nova. If you had a functional brain to use you never would have thought "there's no star" was anything but retardation. But then since you are retarded, that's why you didn't realize it.

Thanks for proving you have nothing yet again. I'd think you'd get tired of showing how stupid you are.

You are unbelievably stupid. There was no star you idiot. There was an explosion and THEN a star was born. Was there a star before the explosion? No you idiot.

Originally posted by Delta1938 I, using my brain, can tell you that the Sun going nova is far far beyond a supernova because it's not a nova.

This doesn't make much sense. Our sun is not massive enough to become a supernova anyway.

Any chance you lot could get back on topic, please?

Originally posted by -Pr-
Any chance you lot could get back on topic, please?

I'm trying to stay on topic by comparing the supernova feats.