Batman With Thor's Hammer VS Teams...

Started by abhilegend3 pages

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Alfred is probably more worthy of Mjolnir than Bruce. biscuits

But yeah, he gets trashed here. He stops at Day 2 for sure, and hell, you could argue Tony beating him anyway. I would.


Bada would make you pay for that.

durhulk

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
You DARE make threats to Santa Raptor?! No gifts for you. sneer

I don't make threats. Just promises.

And there's only one monarch of Christmas around these parts, Bada.

Santa Doom 😂

and character with batman level h2h should beat almost every character under skyfather with mljonir

To be fair, Batman is probably more worthy than Superman, although that isn't really saying much.

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
and character with batman level h2h should beat almost every character under skyfather with mljonir

Nah, I think Batman's paranoia, duplicitous, manipulative nature, and general personality make him unworthy of Mjolnir. I think on one hand, he is definitely more of a "warrior type" than Superman, but Bruce's various character traits would wind up screwing him over.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Nah, I think Batman's paranoia, duplicitous, manipulative nature, and general personality make him unworthy of Mjolnir. I think on one hand, he is definitely more of a "warrior type" than Superman, but Bruce's various character traits would wind up screwing him over.

Which was my point, I was saying that even someone as far from being worthy as Batman, is still more worthy than Superman.

Hahaha. Oh snake-eyes.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Which was my point, I was saying that even someone as far from being worthy as Batman, is still more worthy than Superman.

Really? I'd imagine Superman as being more worthy than Batman is, maybe not from the warrior mindset perspective, but from being an honorable and noble intentioned man. Ultimately, Clark is a good guy at the end of the day and Bruce isn't. Wielding Mjolnir is more than being a warrior or a good guy, obviously, but I think Superman is closer to the ideal than Batman would be.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Really? I'd imagine Superman as being more worthy than Batman is, maybe not from the warrior mindset perspective, but from being an honorable and noble intentioned man. Ultimately, Clark is a good guy at the end of the day and Bruce isn't. Wielding Mjolnir is more than being a warrior or a good guy, obviously, but I think Superman is closer to the ideal than Batman would be.

I imagine that the requirments for both nobility and warrior midset are set ridiculously high, I just think that warrior midset is slightly more important(it is a warhammer)...after all even Balder the Brave can't lift it and IIRC he's supposed to be the most noble Asgardain around.

That said, I don't think either are close to being worthy, as they each are sorely lacking in at least one area.

Superman is as noble and pure as it comes. Spectre has outright stated that. He's capable of taking hard decisions too which Bruce wouldn't.

Well I guess this debate boils down to whether Batman gets Thors stats. With them, He can **** around for 3 minutes and clear this. Without, he could possibly stop at 1. Most definitely stops at 2.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Really? I'd imagine Superman as being more worthy than Batman is, maybe not from the warrior mindset perspective, but from being an honorable and noble intentioned man. Ultimately, Clark is a good guy at the end of the day and Bruce isn't. Wielding Mjolnir is more than being a warrior or a good guy, obviously, but I think Superman is closer to the ideal than Batman would be.

Bats isn't a good guy, but he's a hell of a hero. I think either fit fairly well, buy they'd need to get over the killing problem they have. Mjolnir seems to like warriors, ones who do what's necessary when the time comes. Under that stip, Thor, cap, Bill, etc, have all fit the bill in addition to nobility and all that jazz.

Originally posted by Damborgson
Bats isn't a good guy, but he's a hell of a hero. I think either fit fairly well, buy they'd need to get over the killing problem they have. Mjolnir seems to like warriors, ones who do what's necessary when the time comes. Under that stip, Thor, cap, Bill, etc, have all fit the bill in addition to nobility and all that jazz.

I think WW fits the best, IMO she has both the warrior mindset and nobility needed to lift Mjolnir.

Yeab. WW I think fits it pretty well. Better than Supes anyway. That guys a total douche canoe

Originally posted by ShadowFyre
Well I guess this debate boils down to whether Batman gets Thors stats. With them, He can **** around for 3 minutes and clear this. Without, he could possibly stop at 1. Most definitely stops at 2.

Even with Thor stats, I don't see him getting past Superman and Diana at all. Not with a day of prep. And I still find it sketchy he gets past Tony to begin with.

You dont think someone with Thors stats and Mjolnir could beat IronMan?

Originally posted by ShadowFyre
You dont think someone with Thors stats and Mjolnir could beat IronMan?

Thor's stats and Mjolnir, but with only a day to try and get used to using them.