Originally posted by quanchi112
An old wizard beat him in a few minutes with tk attacks.Except he didn't. Smaug did. We don't talk about what ifs we talk about facts. Debate like a man.
A special weapon designed to pierce him with the speed Balrog doesn't have to inflict the damage.
I just went over the feats. You said Balrog could have which means he doesn't have the feats Smaug has. I could care less who is more likeable you woman. Smaug has greater feats, is more durable, faster, and is smarter.
More red herrings.
No shit, it was a snide remark on your ridiculousness. Blarog's feat > Smaug's thus far. But it's hilarious that you can't comprehend how a being composed in part of fire couldn't start a fire
The black arrow is for all intents and purposes just a well crafted metal bolt. This is what damages Smaug.
What do you base your "Balrog can't harm Smaug" on?
Your feats are "Smaug burned down a town!". An army of Orcs could do that with enough torches. You care, you're Cumberbatch man-crushing again, it's clear to all.
Greater feats you can't name.
How is Smaug more durable? The Balrog survived a multi kilometer fall.
What do you base your "Smaug is smarter" on? Just because he talked? He was tricked by the dwarves. His intelligence is also offset by his arrogance.
That's three questions you keep dodging, care to answer them now?