Lotr (movie universe) vs. Twilight Princess

Started by Dramatic Gecko35 pages
Dramatic Gecko Gypsy With Internet
Originally posted by quanchi112
Is this supposed to make sense ?

You may be unfamiliar with this form of communication. I'm proposing a new idea, not just arguing the point.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Dramatic Gecko
You may be unfamiliar with this form of communication. I'm proposing a new idea, not just arguing the point.
Saying shadow and flames isn't really proposing anything of merit. You should know this.

BloodRain Knight of Retribution

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, he didn't give us the details as it is speculation. Just a generalized statement.
Yet you can't specify.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by BloodRain
Yet you can't specify.
No one can hence the point.

BloodRain Knight of Retribution

As in you cannot specify any reasons or events that may have disrupted the event he describes.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by BloodRain
As in you cannot specify any reasons or events that may have disrupted the event he describes.
I never disputed the event just the context since we don't know.

BloodRain Knight of Retribution

The event is what was stated with no contradiction or possible interruptions. That's a feat.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by BloodRain
The event is what was stated with no contradiction or possible interruptions. That's a feat.
No, it isn't since we don't know the context.

The Scenario Greater Sci-Fi combatant

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, as we don't see the context and we just hear generalities.

I don't need to try. This is really easy to do to you.

We hear the context. From Barnes. You can do nothing to dispute this, thus Shadow Beast apocalypse all over LotR.

BloodRain Knight of Retribution

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, it isn't since we don't know the context.
Context is listed. What isn't is what could deter this feat, things you're refusing to say for sone reason.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by The Scenario
We hear the context. From Barnes. You can do nothing to dispute this, thus Shadow Beast apocalypse all over LotR.
No, it lacks the context.

False, as light can defeat this and Lotr characters can fight you as spirits.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by BloodRain
Context is listed. What isn't is what could deter this feat, things you're refusing to say for sone reason.
We don't see anything so it lacks the context of what he claimed.

BloodRain Knight of Retribution

Originally posted by quanchi112
We don't see anything so it lacks the context of what he claimed.
We're told the cause and the effects. That's everything needed

Have you found a single thing that says otherwise?

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by BloodRain
We're told the cause and the effects. That's everything needed

Have you found a single thing that says otherwise?

We know the outcome we don't know the details aka the context.

BloodRain Knight of Retribution

He told us the details.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by BloodRain
He told us the details.
He told us generalities. The details aren't all known to us.

BloodRain Knight of Retribution

Nothing was general.

We know it took a bomb for a fact, is this part unknown?

We know it did nothing as per Barns, is this wrong?

We know this is because they are took strong thanks to him, do you still think it was knocked down?

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by BloodRain
Nothing was general.

We know it took a bomb for a fact, is this part unknown?

We know it did nothing as per Barns, is this wrong?

We know this is because they are took strong thanks to him, do you still think it was knocked down?

We don't know any of the circumstances of the fight just generalities.

BloodRain Knight of Retribution

And again, which part is too general to grasp a simple point?

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by BloodRain
And again, which part is too general to grasp a simple point?
It just lacks specifics.