Originally posted by Stealth Moose
Gag me with a spoon.JIA's blinding ignorance to the bible and semantics in general is always apparent, but Supra being his cheerleader is just too much.
Considering I have a longer tenure here at KMC then you, JIA, and your pathetic bandwagonneer trolls.
I am no ones cheerleader but the Lords
And I will cheer his name
Cheer up boy santa is coming tomorrow
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Why wouldn't the Ten Commandments be relevant (still)?
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Sin is the reason why the Lord Jesus died.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
You take the word of Siddhârtha Gautama literally (and you've never even met the man), why not take the Bible literally (at least it is the Word of the living God)?
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Buddha didn't die for your sins.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlivelol
Buddha is dead.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlivelol
God is He Who was, and is, and is to come (i.e. the Eternal One, without father, mother, beginning of days, or end of days, the First and the Last, the Alpha and the Omega, the great I AM THAT I AM) {I had to capitalize that out of reverence for God, not for emphasis or to convey emotion).
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
The Truth of the Word of God is not silly.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
The law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlivelol
The testimony of the Lord is sure, making wise the simple.
Guys, I've seen several reports from this thread. Whatever the problem may be, please take it to a PM. Unless it's already resolved.
Originally posted by Lord LucienAt least you haven't been calling it Exmas! santdur
Wait a minute... it's called CHRISTmas?! I've been calling it KRISmas. Why didn't someone tell me? Oh I've been making an idiot out of myself!
Originally posted by BadabingIt's probably Supra. You should have a look-see through his posts in this and a few other threads here. He's... not all together upstairs.
Guys, I've seen several reports from this thread. Whatever the problem may be, please take it to a PM. Unless it's already resolved.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I’m not a 3,000 year old Jew.I thought it was the Romans.
I do not take the Buddha literally, as the Buddha instructed.
And why would he do such a silly thing?
lol
lolYou cannot handle the truth, as you once said.
There is no perfection.
lol
Is that better, or do you want to just not reply when I lol?
God--through the instrumentality of the Jews (i.e. Hebrews, the descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob) intended to bless the world (i.e. bring the Savior, His dear Son Lord Jesus into the world to save the world from their sins).
So the Ten Commandments was/is necessary to show humanity what sin is, and how incapable we are of ever meeting God's high standard of righteousness apart from Christ Jesus.
In other words, the Law of the Lord is eternally binding.
God's Word is forever settled in Heaven.
The Word of God lives and abides forever.
Till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled.
The Ten Commandments/Word of the living God/Bible does not have a statute of limitations, or expiration date, and is not period-applicable, limited, or specific--but profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work.
No, it was sin: yours, mine, and the sins of the whole world--past, present, and future that nailed Lord Jesus to the cross.
If you do not take Siddhârtha Gautama literally why do you believe his teachings?
Not why would Buddha--how could Buddah.
You see Siddhârtha Gautama (the Buddha) was a sinner just like the rest of the world, and in dire need of the Savior's sacrifice.
There's nothing for me to handle.
The Truth is a Person: Lord Jesus Christ.
Your denial in perfection is absolute.
Why are you so absolute about denying perfection?
What do you base your denial on?
Since you asked, I would prefer you respond with an intelligent, rational, respectful, mature answer--not internet slang.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
God--through the instrumentality of the Jews (i.e. Hebrews, the descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob) intended to bless the world (i.e. bring the Savior, His dear Son Lord Jesus into the world to save the world from their sins).
So the Ten Commandments was/is necessary to show humanity what sin is, and how incapable we are of ever meeting God's high standard of righteousness apart from Christ Jesus.
I am not subject to your laws, for the only sin is slander of the law. This is a tougher road then the one you are on. I journeyed for a time down your path, so I know the difference.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
In other words, the Law of the Lord is eternally binding.
…of those who believe that way.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
God's Word is forever settled in Heaven.
lol
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
The Word of God lives and abides forever.
I have no idea what that really means. Forever is infinity. You should avoid infinity’s, if at all possible. They tell you that your theory is wrong somehow.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled.
It has always been fulfilled.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
The Ten Commandments/Word of the living God/Bible does not have a statute of limitations, or expiration date, and is not period-applicable, limited, or specific--but profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work.
That is fine for your religion, but it doesn’t apply to anything else.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
No, it was sin: yours, mine, and the sins of the whole world--past, present, and future that nailed Lord Jesus to the cross.
All I can say is “Yes, I know that the elephant is like a wall”. I don’t know what else to say.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
If you do not take Siddhârtha Gautama literally why do you believe his teachings?
Why do you have to take something literally to believe it? Have you never heard of fugitive speech, like teaching by parables? That is where Bodhisattva Jesus learned how to teach.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Not why would Buddha--how could Buddah.
How could Buddha what?
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
You see Siddhârtha Gautama (the Buddha) was a sinner just like the rest of the world, and in dire need of the Savior's sacrifice.
lol
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
There's nothing for me to handle.
Then you meant nothing by what you said.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
The Truth is a Person: Lord Jesus Christ.
Personifications are never to be taken literally.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Your denial in perfection is absolute.
Do you see how that is an infinity? There is no way my denial could be absolute. It doesn’t even make sense.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Why are you so absolute about denying perfection?
Why are you so much against dancing unicorns? It’s the same for both of us.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
What do you base your denial on?
Is denial a thing? I thought it was an action. Other than that… lol
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Since you asked, I would prefer you respond with an intelligent, rational, respectful, mature answer--not internet slang.
lol What do you have against internet slang?
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I wanted to tell you why this is funny. If death is never coming back to life, and Nirvana is never having to reincarnate, then Buddha is in nirvana, and he is dead.I just about died of laughter. Thank you.
No, Buddha is not in Nirvana.
There is no such place.
Buddha is not in Heaven either.
That only leaves one place.
You guessed it: Hell.
I don't say this flippantly, but I want you to be forewarned, so that you don't end up there with him.