Shaky, JIA is clearly of some newfangled Evangelical sect and has very strict ideas of who is or isn't kosher enough to understand and interpret God and spiritual enough to get it. Even though he wants us all to believe so we can frolic in heaven instead of burning in hell.
This kind of sophistry has been used for centuries to keep commoners from guessing and keep the church in power. Which church is irrelevant; most exercise this narrow scope of who can and can't read and define God's word, even though that's what Martin Luther protested among other things.
JIA is to religious obfuscation and misdirection what contact juggling is to anal beads, and addressing him further is fruitless.
Supra, your level of conventional moral reasoning assumes that ethics cannot exist unless it is subject to the whims of God. You are saying anything that God approves of is good and anything he detests is evil. So if God came to you in a dream and told you to kill infidels, would you question this? Or would you blindly attach yourself to his alien agenda and commit murder?
I don't understand how people can believe that God is a good guy, even if he does exist. Instead of you know, forcibly preventing evil from happening he makes a virgin give birth to a guy who converts the beginning of a movement that will be persecutes for three centuries before the same man is tortured and killed.
FOR OUR SINS.
Like, wtf. How is this a good act versus you know, just not having bad things take place? You mean to tell me Jesus' sacrifice or the sacrifice of his followers and later their religious enemies was okay because God said so? Pass the pipe.