Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Are both trigger independent?
Its hard to find info on it, but I don't think so from what I can see from the pictures. and single bolt.
http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2014/01/foghorn/gilboas-double-barreled-ar-15-makes-american-debut/
Originally posted by BackFire
Absolutely. More guns means less shootings. Just like cars, more cars on the roads means less accidents. It's simple math.
I did an analysis of DoT's records a couple of years back and, despite the number of cars increasing on the road, there were less crashes and less fatalities per 100,000 people. On top of that, the crashes per 100k and the deaths per 100k have been steadily decreasing year over year. I did this comparison to show that "texters", despite having an exponential growth as drivers over the last 15 years, did not only NOT increase crashes, they didn't increase fatalities, either. Something else is at play, in America, that is increasing the safety of both drivers and cars (that should be understandable; cars are, generally, getting safer. But I cannot explain why crashes, per 100k cars, is decreasing).
I know, go ahead and say your point went right over my head. 🙁
I'm sorry..I'm sorry...I just wanted to point out the car thing I analyzed.
Wait, what were we even talking about? Guns?
I think every person that owns a gun should be required to take both a written and practical exam every 2 years. The practical would prove they know how to operate ALL the guns they own and effectively shoot it with reasonable accuracy. The written would check for other things like common sense safety ideas, laws, etc.
I think this should be a federal law that applies to every state but each state, if their conceal and carry laws are better than the federal one, could institute their own C&C laws.
Also, I think that your rhetoric is fundamentally wrong. What would happen would be an increase of accidental shootings (believe this is your point). But I am positive, based on the statistics, that the number of robberies, assaults, etc. would decrease.
Edit - There are many recent resources and studies for this. But, let's start with Forbes:
Originally posted by Supra
Its hard to find info on it, but I don't think so from what I can see from the pictures. and single bolt.http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2014/01/foghorn/gilboas-double-barreled-ar-15-makes-american-debut/
For the guy with the extra-extra small penis?
Originally posted by Robtardlol. Damn. Shame on me that I missed that. Sorry, Freud.
For the guy with the extra-extra small penis?
Originally posted by Bardock42"excellent sequence" is a cool pair.
"cue eerie theremin" that is an excellent sequence of words...
I always liked that word: "sequence".
Originally posted by Lord LucienIt's the e's, man, it's the e's.
Looks kinda Latiny.
Originally posted by Supra
I travel a lot and meet a lot of Aussies, every time I meet one I try to at least them all the same question..Do you regret having to give up your firearms in Australia ..
They all say yes..they wish they still had their guns.
Granted Aussies never go to war so why would they need them..
I seriously don't have a clue what you're talking about?
I'm a 45 yr old Australian & never ever once have I had a conversation with another Australian claiming "they wish they still had guns."
Guns in this culture have always been for hunting & sporting reasons.
The inclination to arm ourselves for protection has never been a political or "human rights" issue.
Trust me, every time we see or read a news article about yet another high school shooting or random drive-by in America...we cringe at the senseless violence, WE DON'T WATCH IN ENVY WISHING WE HAD GUNS.
Then you go on to say, "Aussies never go to war..."
So we were never involved in WW2, Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan or Iraq????