How Superman ruined Shazam movie
http://www.cinemablend.com/new/How-Man-Steel-Stopped-Shazam-Movie-40868.html
Dc just making silly decisions and preventing other dc heroes from taking the spotlight.
How Superman ruined Shazam movie
http://www.cinemablend.com/new/How-Man-Steel-Stopped-Shazam-Movie-40868.html
Dc just making silly decisions and preventing other dc heroes from taking the spotlight.
Well, if they're planning on keeping Superman as a flagship movie franchise I think it makes sense to not do a Shazam movie for a while. Dc is still trying to rebuild and establish Superman on the big screen again. I think after another movie or two and after a Justic League movie people would be ready for Shazam.
Originally posted by jinXed by JaNx
Well, if they're planning on keeping Superman as a flagship movie franchise I think it makes sense to not do a Shazam movie for a while. Dc is still trying to rebuild and establish Superman on the big screen again. I think after another movie or two and after a Justic League movie people would be ready for Shazam.
spot on
Re: How Superman ruined Shazam movie
Originally posted by quanchi112
Dc just making silly decisions and preventing other dc heroes from taking the spotlight.
You're clueless 🙂
Making a Shazam flick when they're trying to re establish Superman and set up a Justice League series of flicks would be a stupid move.
Originally posted by RobtardWhat is wrong with establishing both at the same time or releasing Shazam afterwards. Nothing. It is all about Superman and Batman while the other heroes take a backseat. Marvel meanwhile is shitting down Superman's throat. Open wide, Kal.
You're clueless 🙂Making a Shazam flick when they're trying to re establish Superman and set up a Justice League series of flicks would be a stupid move.
So, this article basically has no proof whatsoever. That's nice, I guess.
If WB are making the choice to slow Shazam as a movie for the time being due to Superman, then I can understand why, as it might confuse some people. I think there are ways around it though, and they shouldn't be so hasty.
lol @ the insecure butt-hurt though. Seriously, it's always amusing.
I found another article which i posted in the Comic book movies section
Superman’s Resurgence Dashes Hopes For ‘Shazam’ Movie
http://spinoff.comicbookresources.com/2013/12/26/supermans-resurgence-dashes-hopes-for-shazam-movie/
Originally posted by -Pr-
So, this article basically has no proof whatsoever. That's nice, I guess.If WB are making the choice to slow Shazam as a movie for the time being due to Superman, then I can understand why, as it might confuse some people. I think there are ways around it though, and they shouldn't be so hasty.
lol @ the insecure butt-hurt though. Seriously, it's always amusing.
Originally posted by KazenjiSo all of these sites are just making things up. The denial is always amusing. Keep up the blinders.
I found another article which i posted in the Comic book movies sectionSuperman’s Resurgence Dashes Hopes For ‘Shazam’ Movie
http://spinoff.comicbookresources.com/2013/12/26/supermans-resurgence-dashes-hopes-for-shazam-movie/
lol, quanicakes.
They're all posting the same thing. The director's opinion as to why there won't be a movie is one thing. Whether we actually get a statement about it is another, especially with DC pushing Shazam pretty hard in the comics this last while.
Nice of you to completely ignore the part of my post where I addressed what it would mean if it was actually true, though.
I know you hate DC, but try to see past your obvious bias for once, kay?
Originally posted by -Pr-Its all a big conspiracy theory when people say dc focuses too heavily on Superman and Batman. If you can't see it or acknowledge it then have fun. Meanwhile I'll be enjoying marvel phase 2 and then three.
lol, quanicakes.They're all posting the same thing. The director's opinion as to why there won't be a movie is one thing. Whether we actually get a statement about it is another, especially with DC pushing Shazam pretty hard in the comics this last while.
Nice of you to completely ignore the part of my post where I addressed what it would mean if it was actually true, though.
I know you hate DC, but try to see past your obvious bias for once, kay?
Originally posted by quanchi112
Its all a big conspiracy theory when people say dc focuses too heavily on Superman and Batman. If you can't see it or acknowledge it then have fun. Meanwhile I'll be enjoying marvel phase 2 and then three.
lol, because Wonder Woman wasn't totally added to the movie. And they totally don't have other movies in the works. Your hate blinds you.
Of course, only you can enjoy Marvel, right? lol.
Originally posted by -Pr-She can be added but the focus isn't on her which is the problem. Marvel showcases multiple heroes and then let's them team up for the Avengers. Dc puts everything else on hold and reboots Superman and Batman again while sharing screen time. Big whoop.
lol, because Wonder Woman wasn't totally added to the movie. And they totally don't have other movies in the works. Your hate blinds you.Of course, only you can enjoy Marvel, right? lol.
You loved Man of Steel. The movie was offensive to my sensibilities but if you like repetitive action along with a stale romance then Man of Stell will click alright.
Originally posted by quanchi112
She can be added but the focus isn't on her which is the problem. Marvel showcases multiple heroes and then let's them team up for the Avengers. Dc puts everything else on hold and reboots Superman and Batman again while sharing screen time. Big whoop.You loved Man of Steel. The movie was offensive to my sensibilities but if you like repetitive action along with a stale romance then Man of Stell will click alright.
Your logic is broken. Stop pretending like DC and Marvel are at the same point in development.
lol, you again with the personal insults. Stay classy as always, junior Marvel fan.
Originally posted by -Pr-I never said they were on the same point in development. Marvel is light years ahead. Part of the problem is Dc's focus on Superman and Batman whereas marvel is bringing Ironman and Thor into our living rooms. Seems like the bigger heads at dc are hellbent on history repeating itself.
Your logic is broken. Stop pretending like DC and Marvel are at the same point in development.lol, you again with the personal insults. Stay classy as always, junior Marvel fan.
Plus, like it or not, Caps more of a"B lister" by mainstream standards. Making a movie with him makes about as much sense as Marvel making a Beta Ray Bill movie during the build up to Avengers.. Or, showing the Guardians of the Galaxy before the A listers broke the box office and established interest for the likes of Rocket Raccoon and Groot.
As much as I'd personally like to see Billy (and Bill😉 ) get a movie, now isn't really the time..
Originally posted by quanchi112
I never said they were on the same point in development. Marvel is light years ahead. Part of the problem is Dc's focus on Superman and Batman whereas marvel is bringing Ironman and Thor into our living rooms. Seems like the bigger heads at dc are hellbent on history repeating itself.
Except your posts keep acting like they are. Marvel's first big movies were about its bigger characters ie Xmen and Spidey. And Hulk. Iron Man came much later, as much as you might like to pretend otherwise.
Originally posted by cdtm
Plus, like it or not, Caps more of a"B lister" by mainstream standards. Making a movie with him makes about as much sense as Marvel making a Beta Ray Bill movie during the build up to Avengers.. Or, showing the Guardians of the Galaxy before the A listers broke the box office and established interest for the likes of Rocket Raccoon and Groot.As much as I'd personally like to see Billy (and Bill😉 ) get a movie, now isn't really the time..
Exactly.