How Superman ruined Shazam movie

Originally posted by -Pr-
Except your posts keep acting like they are. Marvel's first big movies were about its bigger characters ie Xmen and Spidey. And Hulk. Iron Man came much later, as much as you might like to pretend otherwise.

Exactly.

Disney's marvel makes Dc's movie universe look like a junior varsity.

Originally posted by quanchi112
What is wrong with establishing both at the same time or releasing Shazam afterwards. Nothing.

It is all about Superman and Batman while the other heroes take a backseat.

Marvel meanwhile is shitting down Superman's throat. Open wide, Kal.

Why isn't Marvel making a Beta Ray Bill movie right now? Exactly. You might as well cry that DCisn't focusing on a Matter-Eating Lad film instead of a sequel to MoS.

Considering they're two of the biggest characters in DC, focusing on them right now makes sense, if you had any common sense you'd know this. There's also the fact they're setting up movies for other DC heroes and seemingly going to use the JL flick as the launch pad. Different strategy than Marvel; as a fan of superhero movies I'm hoping it works.

Again, you're probably the only bandwagon-boi who cares about "Marvel is making more money at the moment", if DC heroes start making more money, you'll just as quickly jump over, tourist. ie Batman films did very well; you claim to like them, bandwagon-boi.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Xmen and Spidey aren't in the same movie universe nor are they in the same plans as Disney's marvel universe. Iron Man, Thor, and Cap not more of the same. They threw in an entirely new Hulk into the Avengers movie as well.

Disney's marvel makes Dc's movie universe look like a junior varsity.

Are you intentionally ignoring what I said, or just pretending to?

Originally posted by -Pr-
If WB are making the choice to slow Shazam as a movie for the time being due to Superman, then I can understand why, as it might confuse some people.

Originally posted by quanchi112
They threw in an entirely new Hulk into the Avengers movie as well.

Incorrect again. While the actor changed, it's the same character in regards to Banner/Hulk and the events of The Incredible Hulk (2008) are part of the same continuity and lead up to The Avengers, just as the Thor, Iron Man 1&2 and Captain America do.

This has got to be the 3rd or 4th time I've explained this to you, watch the damn film already if you can't accept some else’s word 🙂

Originally posted by Robtard
Why isn't Marvel making a Beta Ray Bill movie right now? Exactly. You might as well cry that DCisn't focusing on a Matter-Eating Lad film instead of a sequel to MoS.

Considering they're two of the biggest characters in DC, focusing on them right now makes sense, if you had any common sense you'd know this. There's also the fact they're setting up movies for other DC heroes and seemingly going to use the JL flick as the launch pad. Different strategy than Marvel; as a fan of superhero movies I'm hoping it works.

Again, you're probably the only bandwagon-boi who cares about "Marvel is making more money at the moment", if DC heroes start making more money, you'll just as quickly jump over, tourist. ie Batman films did very well; you claim to like them, bandwagon-boi.

Ironman crushed the rebooted Man of Steel at the box office.

I don't care about money making but it is an objective indicator on which company is more successful. Marvel makes better movies. Points to Avengers. Pumps arms. 🙂

Originally posted by -Pr-
Are you intentionally ignoring what I said, or just pretending to?

Originally posted by Robtard
Incorrect again. While the actor changed, it's the same character in regards to Banner/Hulk and the events of The Incredible Hulk (2008) are part of the same continuity and lead up to The Avengers, just as the Thor, Iron Man 1&2 and Captain America do.

This has got to be the 3rd or 4th time I've explained this to you, watch the damn film already if you can't accept some else’s word 🙂

😂

Another long tear filled rant of yours.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Marvel isn't just focusing on a few characters the company makes everyone take a backseat to these two. Hilarious.

Ironman crushed the rebooted Man of Steel at the box office.

I don't care about money making but it is an objective indicator on which company is more successful. Marvel makes better movies. Points to Avengers. Pumps arms. 🙂

Neither is DC, if you follow their plans for setting up other characters 🙂

Iron Man 3 did.

😂 The guy who does nothing but rant about "made more!" obviously cares; that's all you care about in deciding what you like more, fairweather-fan-boi.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I ignored no such thing.

Well you didn't address anything I said, so...

Originally posted by marwash22
we're denied seeing the Rock as Black Adam because people are stupid?

I never said it was a good excuse.

Originally posted by quanchi112
It is an entirely different Hulk as in Mark Ruffalo. It isn't Ed Norton.

😂

Another long tear filled rant of yours.

Oh my, you're just dense.

Did you miss the fact that we see Tony Stark in the end credits of The Incredible Hulk? <--- Clicky 🙂

Did you not follow that the part where Ruffalo explains "I got low and I put a bullet in my mouth" was a nod to the deleted scene in The Incredible Hulk where Banner tries to kill himself, but Hulks out? 🙂

So for what is probably the 5th time, The Incredible Hulk (2008) is part of the same continuity as Thor, Captain America, Iron Man and The Avengets flicks 🙂

Originally posted by Robtard
Neither is DC, if you follow their plans for setting up other characters 🙂

Iron Man 3 did.

😂 The guy who does nothing but rant about "made more!" obviously cares; that's all you care about in deciding what you like more, fairweather-fan-boi.

Yes, it did.

The films are better. Man of Steel was absolute garbage. I look down on anyone who says it is an awesome movie.

Originally posted by Robtard
Oh my, you're just dumb.

Did you miss the fact that we see Tony Stark in the end credits of The Incredible Hulk?

Did you not follow the part where Ruffalo explains "I got low and I put a bullet in my mouth" was a nod to the deleted scene in The Incredible Hulk where Banner tries to kill himself, but Hulks out?

So for what is probably the 5th time, The Incredible Hulk (2008) is part of the same continuity as Thor, Captain America, Iron Man and The Avengets flicks 🙂

Dear lord. You don't really catch on at all. I never said it wasn't part of the same continuity. 😉

Originally posted by -Pr-
Well you didn't address anything I said, so...

I never said it was a good excuse.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Incorrect.

lol, you actually lie, as usual, to cover your tracks. Okay.

Originally posted by -Pr-
lol, you actually lie, as usual, to cover your tracks. Okay.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I never said it wasn't I said the actor who played the Hulk was out.

Dear lord. You don't really catch on at all. I never said it wasn't part of the same continuity. 😉

Now you're just doing flips cos you're proven wrong again with facts. You clearly said above that "it's a new Hulk", even after I explained to you that only the actor changed you still ranted that "it's a new Hulk".

Originally posted by quanchi112
Xmen and Spidey aren't in the same movie universe nor are they in the same plans as Disney's marvel universe. Iron Man, Thor, and Cap not more of the same. They threw in an entirely new Hulk into the Avengers movie as well.

You clearly thought so and that was your point. Now instead of being an adult and just saying "ah, okay, I see now", do more flips like a child 🙂

Originally posted by Robtard
Now you're just doing flips cos you're proven wrong again with facts. You clearly said above that "it's a new Hulk", even after I explained to you that only the actor changed you still ranted that "it's a new Hulk".

You clearly though so and that was your point 🙂

Norton isn't Ruffalo. Keep crying.

😂

Called it. Instead of acting like an adult and just admitting you made an error, you keep doing flips like a child. You clearly thought The Incredible Hulk is a different Hulk than the one in The Avengers continuity wise, when they're one and the same.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Xmen and Spidey aren't in the same movie universe nor are they in the same plans as Disney's marvel universe. Iron Man, Thor, and Cap not more of the same. They threw in an entirely new Hulk into the Avengers movie as well.

😂 @ you acting like a child.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I didn't lie about anything. You on the other hand said dc never focuses on Superman and puts other heroes on the shelf. These websites and their crazy theories.

I never said that. im sure you'll start spouting off bullshit about how I implied it, though, so ill save you the trouble. I didn't say or imply anything of the sort.

and yes, you do, and did.

But please, tell me how this:

Originally posted by quanchi112
Xmen and Spidey aren't in the same movie universe nor are they in the same plans as Disney's marvel universe. Iron Man, Thor, and Cap not more of the same. They threw in an entirely new Hulk into the Avengers movie as well.

Disney's marvel makes Dc's movie universe look like a junior varsity.

has any relevance to what I said, which is this:

Originally posted by -Pr-
Except your posts keep acting like they are. Marvel's first big movies were about its bigger characters ie Xmen and Spidey. And Hulk. Iron Man came much later, as much as you might like to pretend otherwise.

Exactly.

ill give you a clue. it doesn't.