Originally posted by wakkawakkawakkaThey own the a Batman character not Nolan.
It has Banner in South America, that's about it. I'm not a copyright-buff but I'm pretty sure DC can't just use Nolan's Batman in an adaptation w/o his permission.So you admit to picking on DC for no reason right?
I am criticizing dc for being stupid with their characters. This is why they are years behind and playing copy cat to marvel's model.
Originally posted by quanchi112The hell is wrong with you, keep making these absurd claims in some futile manner to crap on DC. Marvel has also sold rights to several of their characters for live action movie purposes; are they in turn "stupid"?
I am criticizing dc for being stupid with their characters. This is why they are years behind and playing copy cat to marvel's model.
-Sony: Spider-Man and Ghost Rider (and all related villains, characters, etc.)
-Fox: X-Men, Daredevil, and the Fantastic Four (and all related villains, characters, etc.)
-Marvel Studios/Disney: Isn't allowed to talk of "mutants" in their films, else they get slapped with a copy-write lawsuit.
While Warner Bros owns the vast majority of DC characters, which means they could potentially mix and match any number of heroes without legal issues.
You hate DC, fine; you're free to do so. Just stop making these asinine claims that keep exploding back in your face.
Originally posted by RobtardDisney owns marvel and are using various other heels to connect their universes.
The hell is wrong with you, keep making these absurd claims in some futile manner to crap on DC. Marvel has also sold rights to several of their characters for live action movie purposes; are they in turn "stupid"?-Sony- Spider-Man and Ghost Rider (and all related villains, characters, etc.)
-Fox- X-Men, Daredevil, and the Fantastic Four (and all related villains, characters, etc.)
-Marvel Studios/Disney isn't allowed to talk of "mutants" in their films, else they get slapped with a copy-write lawsuit.
While Warner Bros owns the vast majority of DC characters, which means they could potentially mix and match any number of heroes without legal issues.
You hate DC, fine; you're free to do so. Just stop making these asinine claims that keep exploding back in your face.
What is funny is time warner owns all dc properties so it is even more unforgivable they have yet to do so.
Thanks for helping me make my point.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Disney owns marvel and are using various other heels to connect their universes.What is funny is time warner owns all dc properties so it is even more unforgivable they have yet to do so.
Thanks for helping me make my point.
You didn't answer the question, you dodged and danced. Repeat: Is Marvel "stupid" like DC because they sold the movie rights to characters?
Yeah, I just told you this, so you're welcome. They're also working on combining the characters now, hence all the talk of a Superman/Batman flick and a JLA, genius,
Your point is that you hate DC and use an asinine double-standard to try and talk shit. Do yourself a favor, hate DC privately and stop making claims that make you look like a complete imbecile.
Originally posted by RobtardNo, as the rights will eventually come back to them. They have enough properties now to focus on.
You didn't answer the question, you dodged and danced. Repeat: Is Marvel "stupid" like DC because they sold the movie rights to characters?Yeah, I just told you this, so you're welcome. They're also working on combining the characters now, hence all the talk of a Superman/Batman flick and a JLA, genius,
Your point is that you hate DC and use an asinine double-standard to tlak shit. Do yourself a favor, just hate DC privately and stop making claims that make you look like a complete imbecile.
Light years behind.
I made no claims to make me look silly, your own points betray you. Dc owns far more characters in the film rights but marvel has far more movies and heroes as of now.
🙂
Originally posted by quanchi112
No, as the rights will eventually come back to them. They have enough properties now to focus on.Light years behind.
I made no claims to make me look silly, your own points betray you. Dc owns far more characters in the film rights but marvel has far more movies and heroes as of now.
🙂
So you're using a double-standard, as propriety rights over a given length of time(esp if certain deadlines aren't met, see that ashcan FF film as an example) works for both DC and Marvel. Using double-standards just makes you look like an ass.
Avengers came out in 2012, a JL film is slated for 2015-16. Yeah "light years" indeed.
See above, you just made two more claims that make you look like a imbecilic Marvel fanboy. Just hate on DC privately and cut the idiotic statements, unless your purpose here is indeed to look like a fool 🙂
Originally posted by RobtardIt isn't about just throwing a movie together it is about establishing the movie universe prior to and effectively bringing them all together. 🙂
So you're using a double-standard, as propriety rights over a given length of time(esp if certain deadlines aren't met, see that ashcan FF film as an example) works for both DC and Marvel. Using double-standards just makes you look like an ass.Avengers came out in 2012, a JL film is slated for 2015-16. Yeah "light years" indeed.
See above, you just made two more claims that make you look like a imbecilic Marvel fanboy. Just hate on DC privately and cut the idiotic statements, unless your purpose here is indeed to look like a fool 🙂
No, marvel has already given plenty of heroes their own solo movies as well as a Guardians of the Galaxy movie on the way. Dc rebooted Superman and here comes another Batman. 😂
I am not using double standards at all.
Originally posted by quanchi112
It isn't about just throwing a movie together it is about establishing the movie universe prior to and effectively bringing them all together. 🙂No, marvel has already given plenty of heroes their own solo movies as well as a Guardians of the Galaxy movie on the way. Dc rebooted Superman and here comes another Batman. 😂
I am not using double standards at all.
And now moving on to an entirely different point. But who says that's the only way of making a great multi-hero comic movie? You're effectively saying that the JL film will suck and it's just some ideas on paper right now.
So? See above.
You are. You outright claimed DC was stupid for selling rights to their characters in film; when it was shown Marvel did the same thing, you made BS excuses.
Originally posted by RobtardFalse.
And now moving on to an entirely different point. But who says that's the only way of making a great multi-hero comic movie?So? See above.
You are. You outright claimed DC was stupid for selling rights to their characters in film; when it was shown Marvel did the same thing, you made BS excuses.
We will see. If dc keeps doing things the way they have done in the past I can't wait to laugh at them.
No, I didn't I said dc didn't bring together their characters and focused on Batman and Superman too heavily. I never claimed anything you said I did. Again, you're clueless and brought your binky.
Originally posted by quanchi112
False.We will see. If dc keeps doing things the way they have done in the past I can't wait to laugh at them.
No, I didn't I said dc didn't bring together their characters and focused on Batman and Superman too heavily. I never claimed anything you said I did. Again, you're clueless and brought your binky.
Now you're angry cos your bubble of nonsense got popped. Do keep flipping and flopping about while making absurd claims about DC because you happen to dislike them, in the end, you're just making yourself look like an ass.
You're like the Marvel version of that WD kid that used to mod in here. Endlessly masturbated DC while bashing Marvel with imbecilic rants, most people just laughed at him, not with. Think about it, Quan.
Originally posted by RobtardNo, you're the same dolt who claimed I'd love Man of Steel and champion it. You say stupid things all the time and misinterpret left and right.
Now you're angry cos your bubble of nonsense got popped. Do keep flipping and flopping about while making absurd claims about DC because you happen to dislike them, in the end, you're just making yourself look like an ass.You're like the Marvel version of that WD kid that used to mod in here. Endlessly masturbated DC while bashing Marvel with imbecilic rants, most people just laughed at him, not with. Think about it, Quan.
Marvel is ahead of dc cinematically to the point of hilarity. Wd was an idiot.
Originally posted by quanchi112
No, you're the same dolt who claimed I'd love Man of Steel and champion it. You say stupid things all the time and misinterpret left and right.Marvel is ahead of dc cinematically to the point of hilarity. Wd was an idiot.
Hilarious. I teased you and said you'd be all over Zod's nuts. So again, you're accusing others of the nonsense you do. Maybe change up your game for 2014?
If less than 5 years is "hilarity", sure. Batman trilogy and MoS both did very well at the box office, don't see anything idiotic about that.
Originally posted by RobtardYou swore up down I would. I laughed and many others laughed at you for it. You don't even see the obvious.
Hilarious. I teased you and said you'd be all over Zod's nuts. So again, you're accusing others of the nonsense you do. Maybe change up your game for 2014?If less than 5 years is "hilarity", sure. Batman trilogy and MoS both did very well at the box office, don't see anything idiotic about that.
Marvel expands whereas dc throws more Batman and Superman at us. That is the point of this thread. Ironman and Thor are widely recognized now.
Dc keeps rebooting same said characters. Marvel expands. 🙂
Re: Re: How Superman ruined Shazam movie
Originally posted by Robtard
You're clueless 🙂Making a Shazam flick when they're trying to re establish Superman and set up a Justice League series of flicks would be a stupid move.
The Shazam character was more interesting including the "lore" and history.
I agree with Quan that they squandered a potentially excellent foray.
Wait, they didn't. There can still be more Shazam flicks.
I think Shazam is similar to Spider-man and it could do VERY well at the box-office as a live-action flick. Also, penis.
Originally posted by quanchi112
You swore up down I would. I laughed and many others laughed at you for it. You don't even see the obvious.Marvel expands whereas dc throws more Batman and Superman at us. That is the point of this thread. Ironman and Thor are widely recognized now.
Dc keeps rebooting same said characters. Marvel expands. 🙂
Stop lying. I teased you that you'd be hugging Zod's nuts since you were doing your usual DC-bashing before MoS came out. "Many others", another stupid lie. Going to keep up the nonsense into 2014?
You keep flipping about and changing. Hate DC privately, unless you enjoy looking like a clown.