Originally posted by a88378438
Your mood is disgusting,
And many find people who are intentionally obtuse to be annoying and trollish. So boohoo to you.
Originally posted by a88378438
even i'm wrong
You are wrong.
Originally posted by a88378438
,This also proves that you are rude to the people,i dont want to debate it's was machine top or not,just give you my point,it's look like isnt machine top from my EYES,
You're seeing what you want to see. I already made my point, again, check the antennae for scale if you want.
Originally posted by a88378438
though,when iron man on the bottom of machine,it's was same bottom,
You're seeing what you want to see. Again, random part of a machine that may look just like any other random part of a machine does not equate to evidence.
Originally posted by a88378438
When the machine image magnification, You can see ms marvel on the bottom,how big of she,then to know how big of the machine,it's very clear
You're seeing what you want to see. All I see are random dots that does not look like ms marvel to me, at least not in the scan you provided.
There's a term we call people who only see what you want to see: Confirmation bias. And that, my friend, is what you are currently suffering from.
Originally posted by a88378438
shut up?
Really?can you prove when rogue planet into earth that prove each other was same size?
Prove it,or shut up?
That?
Put up or shut up is an english expression. Meaning provide what is requested (in this case, evidence of size change as you made the assertion that the panel is not "credible" due to the the sharing of space) or concede the point.
Proof that the earth and the rogue planet was the same size? It's there clear as day in the scan I provided (which you constantly try to ignore).
Corroborated further by the size of the machine in relation to mars and the numerous scans that disprove your size relation scan. My evidence has a higher quantity and quality than yours in terms of size comparison between the machine and the rogue planet (the full page spread with the machine and the multiple panels showing the machine impacting the planet)
Your turn.
What is your proof that the machine changed its size in relation to the rogue planet during the merging?
Originally posted by Nibedicus
And many find people who are intentionally obtuse to be annoying and trollish. So boohoo to you.You are wrong.
You're seeing what you want to see. I already made my point, again, check the antennae for scale if you want.
You're seeing what you want to see. Again, random part of a machine that may look just like any other random part of a machine does not equate to evidence.
You're seeing what you want to see. All I see are random dots that does not look like ms marvel to me, at least not in the scan you provided.
There's a term we call people who only see what you want to see: Confirmation bias. And that, my friend, is what you are currently suffering from.
Originally posted by a88378438
It's not random part of the machine,it's same bottom,not other place,when ms marvel irom man on the bottom,then image to enlarge,you can see bottom of the machine in the scan
A random bottom of the machine that may or may not look like other parts of the machine.
Again, weak evidence only insisted upon by you due to your confirmation bias.
Originally posted by Nibedicus
Put up or shut up is an english expression. Meaning provide what is requested (in this case, evidence of size change as you made the assertion that the panel is "undependable" due to the the sharing of space) or concede the point.Proof that the earth and the rogue planet was the same size? It's there clear as day in the scan I provided (which you constantly try to ignore).
Corroborated further by the size of the machine in relation to mars and the numerous scans that disprove your size relation scan. My evidence has a higher quantity and quality than yours in terms of size comparison between the machine and the rogue planet (the full page spread with the machine and the multiple panels showing the machine impacting the planet)
Your turn.
What is your proof that the machine changed its size in relation to the rogue planet during the merging?
This thread is incredible.
The two planets, when occupying the exact same space, overlap each other. One is noticeably larger than the other. It's like putting one hand on top of another, except in this case, it would be even more accurate as you don't have any tricks of perspective.
Like some other scans...
Originally posted by a88378438
You not prove it,I said they are was same space that not normal space,This comparison is not credible
And why is it "not credible" is there any evidence that the size was altered in any way?
I'm talking about the machine and the rogue planet here.
Originally posted by a88378438
How?bottom of the machine is flat,not uneven,any part of machine was same flat and size
facepalm
Random bottom part that looks similiar (in a machine that would have many similar parts) does not equal same exact place.
How are you not absorbing this?
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
This thread is incredible.The two planets, when occupying the exact same space, overlap each other. One is noticeably larger than the other. It's like putting one hand on top of another, except in this case, it would be even more accurate as you don't have any tricks of perspective.
Like some other scans...
Yeah, I'm thinking this guy is either just so desperate for the "feat" not to be so or is trolling me. Either way, he's being purposely obtuse.
Originally posted by Nibedicus
\And why is it "not credible" is there any evidence that the size was altered in any way?
I'm talking about the machine and the rogue planet here.
facepalm
Random bottom part that looks similiar (in a machine that would have many similar parts) does not equal same exact place.
How are you not absorbing this?
Originally posted by a88378438
So what you mean?when iron man stand a whole different bottom?what?it's was same bottom,that very clear
facepalm
With a machine this large, there will be many "bottoms" that look similar to each other. Some may even look a bit like the larger parts of the ship. While Iron Man may well have stood at the "bottom" this is not the bottom of the machine you're trying to represent here in terms of scale.
Are you dense? How can you not see this?
BTW, this scan:
Happened THREE DAYS before this scan:
Originally posted by a88378438
I dont have enough scan could prove it,but that not happen in the normal space,so it's maybe different,In my opinion it is questionable,No matter what you said
Meaning you have no proof of your little theory, just that you're willing to say anything just to cast doubt on the EXTREMELY solid no-brainer evidence in front of you just because you don't like it.
👇
Originally posted by Nibedicus
facepalmWith a machine this large, there will be many "bottoms" that look similar to each other. Some may even look a bit like the larger parts of the ship. While Iron Man may well have stood at the "bottom" this is not the bottom of the machine you're trying to represent here in terms of scale.
Are you dense? How can you not see this?
BTW, this scan:
Happened THREE DAYS before this scan:
Meaning you have no proof of your little theory, just that you're willing to say anything just to cast doubt on the EXTREMELY solid no-brainer evidence in front of you just because you don't like it.
👇
Originally posted by a88378438
Where have different bottom???did you see iron man stand the mars which not any part of machine,he stand the mars,and give me other part of machine have Similar bottom when iron man stand the bottom,show me
It's not different,that not happen in the normal space,I doubt it what's wrong?
OMG....
This is getting really stupid.
Do you know how big the machine is?
Do you know how much of it is right on the surface of Mars?
Do you understand the concept of "a large machine will have many parts that look approximately alike"?
Do you understand the concept that Iron Man may well be standing on a part of the machine that is on the surface of Mars that share a FEW shape characteristics with some of the larger parts of the machine?
Are you just trolling or what?
Originally posted by a88378438
if rogue planet bigger than earth,then machine must be close to moon of size,how?when a moon-size thing on the mars?
How many times do I need to keep reposting this scan???
This is the actual size of the machine in relation to the rogue planet.
Which when compared to its size vs Mars:
Is pretty damn near consistent comparatively.
Originally posted by Nibedicus
OMG....This is getting really stupid.
Do you know how big the machine is?
Do you know how much of it is right on the surface of Mars?
Do you understand the concept of "a large machine will have many parts that look approximately alike"?
Do you understand the concept that Iron Man may well be standing on a part of the machine that is on the surface of Mars that share a FEW shape characteristics with some of the larger parts of the machine?
Are you just trolling or what?
How many times do I need to keep reposting this scan???
This is the actual size of the machine in relation to the rogue planet.
Which when compared to its size vs Mars:
Is pretty damn near consistent comparatively.
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/attachment.php?s=&action=thumbnail&postid=14583937
The machine was above the mars,that not prove anything
here was when machine on the mars:
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/attachment.php?s=&action=thumbnail&postid=14583941
The machine is close to moon-size
http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/11111/111114397/3541198-5724299914-35411.gif
how big of the mars?
http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/11111/111114397/3541199-1142630994-35411.gif
so,a moon-size thing on the mars,lol
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/attachment.php?s=&action=thumbnail&postid=14583941
Originally posted by a88378438
The writer show us machine on the mars,so,can you found any part of bottom?
.........
Wow. You're reeally not getting what I'm saying are you??
Originally posted by a88378438
really,i dont know who is stupid
There's a lot of things you don't know it seems. But if you really want an answer, a mirror might be the best thing to give you an anwer.
Originally posted by a88378438
there isnt have different bottom,stop trollingThat not a good scan,only a unknow part of the machine'
here,how big of the machine:
For the answer to this, just read below very very slowly. Let it sink into your mind for a second and let it be your guide to show you to the right answer. Beyond that, there is little else I can do for you, my poor fellow.
Originally posted by Nibedicus
Do you know how big the machine is?Do you know how much of it is right on the surface of Mars?
Do you understand the concept of "a large machine will have many parts that look approximately alike"?
Do you understand the concept that Iron Man may well be standing on a part of the machine that is on the surface of Mars that share a FEW shape characteristics with some of the larger parts of the machine?
Originally posted by a88378438
The machine was above the mars,that not prove anything
The damned thing was on the surface of Mars the whole time. Look at the damned scan:
See the pretty red arrows that I've drawn on the scan? See what it's pointing to? That's the ground.
Originally posted by a88378438
here was when machine on the mars:
Which shows very little on how it scales in comparison. It's obvious what constitutes as "evidence" to your biased eyes. It's pretty sad really.
Originally posted by Nibedicus
.........Wow. You're reeally not getting what I'm saying are you??
There's a lot of things you don't know it seems. But if you really want an answer, a mirror might be the best thing to give you an anwer.
For the answer to this, just read below very very slowly. Let it sink into your mind for a second and let it be your guide to show you to the right answer. Beyond that, there is little else I can do for you, my poor fellow.
The damned thing was on the surface of Mars the whole time. Look at the damned scan:
See the pretty red arrows that I've drawn on the scan? See what it's pointing to? That's the ground.
Which shows very little on how it scales in comparison. It's obvious what constitutes as "evidence" to your biased eyes. It's pretty sad really. [/B][/QUOTE]
You scan prove my point,they are stand the mars,they are close to machine's bottom,then writer show us machine'full size scan,what's wrong?
there isnt have different bottom
