Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
In All-Star, the Kryptonians threw Superman to the moon and broke the crust (Which was fixed by some bridges on the surface LOL):King Thor was punched through the Earth and literally shattered it into pieces or whatever:
The difference in power is so astronomical, that you would have to be Forrest Gump to think the two scenes are comparable.
I was thinking the same thing about the feat. That was a great movie wasn't it?
Originally posted by pym-ftw
Ok let me break it down.What's more impressive to you?
If Galactus hit some one and
A.) They blew up multiple planets from the force of the blow causing that person to crash backwards.
Or
B.) That character no showed it.
?
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
In All-Star, the Kryptonians threw Superman to the moon and broke the crust (Which was fixed by some bridges on the surface LOL):King Thor was punched through the Earth and literally shattered it into pieces or whatever:
The difference in power is so astronomical, that you would have to be Forrest Gump to think the two scenes are comparable.
And the moon was broken as Superman stated, they repaired it after awhile.
Originally posted by abhilegend
B.
As usual, Rage completely misunderstands what is being said. I am not comparing both scenes at all as I already stated.And the moon was broken as Superman stated, they repaired it after awhile.
Still... There was the punched through the Earth thing that also happened, and Thor shrugged it off as if it were a love tap. I get what you're saying, but it did seem as if you were comparing the two. They aren't really all that comparable. At least not in terms of scope.
Originally posted by Stoic
Still... There was the punched through the Earth thing that also happened, and Thor shrugged it off as if it were a love tap. I get what you're saying, but it did seem as if you were comparing the two. They aren't really all that comparable. At least not in terms of scope.
srug
Originally posted by abhilegend
B.
As usual, Rage completely misunderstands what is being said. I am not comparing both scenes at all as I already stated.And the moon was broken as Superman stated, they repaired it after awhile.
Then that's your fault for not making your initial post clear as it certainly seemed to indicate a comparison.
If by broken, you mean they damaged the crust, sure. If by broken, you mean they cracked it in half like in your initial post:
Originally posted by abhilegend
Those kryptonians in All star Superman threw Superman to the moon and broke it in half. I'd hardly rate them as high heralds.
Then you are on some heavy duty drugs bro.
Yes, they fixed it by using bridges on top of the fissures. Thus proving how incredibly superficial and minor the damage was compared to the King Thor scene.
Originally posted by abhilegend
What Thor endured was unquestionably superior, but that's not what I was talking about. The attack that knocked out King Thor blew up nothing, and yet it KOED Thor.srug
LOL.
That implies that we don't have an idea of the scale of the battle and King Thor wasn't taken out by a particularly powerful attack. Putting aside the fact that this is King Thor and Galactus, we already have about 6 pages of fighting to establish what level they are working at.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Then that's your fault for not making your initial post clear as it certainly seemed to indicate a comparison.If by broken, you mean they damaged the crust, sure. If by broken, you mean they cracked it in half like in your initial post:
Then you are on some heavy duty drugs bro.
Yes, they fixed it by using bridges on top of the fissures. Thus proving how incredibly superficial and minor the damage was compared to the King Thor scene.
And repairing it with bridges doesn't mean anything. Hulk kept sakaar from falling apart with his bare hands. Surely that was some superficial damage, right?
Your tendency to overblow everything is ****ing annoying.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
LOL.That implies that we don't have an idea of the scale of the battle and King Thor wasn't taken out by a particularly powerful attack. Putting aside the fact that this is King Thor and Galactus, we already have about 6 pages of fighting to establish what level they are working at.
Originally posted by abhilegend
Oh, shut up. I was just providing an example of how someone not a herald broke moon.And repairing it with bridges doesn't mean anything. Hulk kept sakaar from falling apart with his bare hands. Surely that was some superficial damage, right?
Your tendency to overblow everything is ****ing annoying.
No, it means collateral damage isn't proof of anything.
Don't be upset with me that you used a shitty example, in a poorly written post, to -inefficiently- try and prove your shitty point.
And no, they didn't break the moon. And the most certainly didn't break it in half. 😂
LOL. I've told you before, words have meaning. You know who's fault it is when I repeatedly post your own contradictory posts or dumb arguments to belittle and make fun of you like Digi at a high school reunion? Yours. Words have meaning. Make better arguments, or at least stop being so incoherent and contradictory.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Don't be upset with me that you used a shitty example, in a poorly written post, to -inefficiently- try and prove your shitty point.And no, they didn't break the moon. And the most certainly didn't break it in half. 😂
LOL. I've told you before, words have meaning. You know who's fault it is when I repeatedly post your own contradictory posts or dumb arguments to belittle and make fun of you like Digi at a high school reunion? Yours. Words have meaning. Make better arguments, or at least stop being so incoherent and contradictory.
Yeah, no. Superman clearly said that they broke the moon.
Funny thing is, you don't know what the **** are you talking about. Come back at me when you know how to differentiate between a hyperbole and a statement. But keep raging on.
👆
Originally posted by abhilegend
Upset? I'm just bewildered at your sudden outburst. Chill down.Yeah, no. Superman clearly said that they broke the moon.
Funny thing is, you don't know what the **** are you talking about. Come back at me when you know how to differentiate between a hyperbole and a statement. But keep raging on.
👆
Outburst? All I've done is point out how faulty your supposed "not-comparison" was.
And then we see that they clearly didn't. Much less break it in half. There's an entire thread devoted to you doubting the NARRATION of Thor shattering worlds because we did not see enough or whatever. Here you get to see the actual damage being CONTRADICTORY to what a CHARACTER, who was a blubbering and pathetic mess at the time mind you, said.
They broke the moon in only the loosest interpretation of that phrase. Stop trying to pass off a bloody nose for a caved in skull. No one is that dumb as to think they BROKE the moon in half or that it's in anyway comparable to the King Thor scene when we saw that they only caused damage to the crust.
So now your POST was hyperbole and wasn't intended to be taken as accurate? 😂
How about you invest in a dictionary? You seem to not know the meaning of certain words and then get upset because I call you out when you make a stupid or inaccurate post.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Outburst? All I've done is point out how faulty your supposed "not-comparison" was.And then we see that they clearly didn't. Much less break it in half. There's an entire thread devoted to you doubting the NARRATION of Thor shattering worlds because we did not see enough or whatever. Here you get to see the actual damage being CONTRADICTORY to what a CHARACTER, who was a blubbering and pathetic mess at the time mind you, said.
They broke the moon in only the loosest interpretation of that phrase. Stop trying to pass off a bloody nose for a caved in skull. No one is that dumb as to think they BROKE the moon in half or that it's in anyway comparable to the King Thor scene when we saw that they only caused damage to the crust.
So now your POST was hyperbole and wasn't intended to be taken as accurate? 😂
How about you invest in a dictionary? You seem to not know the meaning of certain words and then get upset because I call you out when you make a stupid or inaccurate post.
We saw the moon having been repaired. Unless you see a scene where the damage was only done in crust. I know you're desperate but this is lulzworthy. Superman clearly said that they broke the moon, no two ways about it. Writing in caps doesn't mean you're right bro.
Breaking the nose means caved in skull now? Amazing shittiest analogies as usual rage. Broken nose means broken nose. Fractured and broken are two different terms, learn about them.
facepalm
I haven't seen such blatant obtuseness in forever.
Nah, you just stick your nose where it doesn't belong. And then ramble about it for 15 pages. Get over yourself, seriously.
Originally posted by abhilegend
What Thor endured was unquestionably superior, but that's not what I was talking about. The attack that knocked out King Thor blew up nothing, and yet it KOED Thor.srug
Now let's see if people finally understand what I was trying to say to those wanking the :"he punched him into the moon and it broke and he was fine so he'll trounce H/P Doomsday!" feat.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
OK, so Abhi, what was the purpose of showing All Star again,
Heck, Superman himself survived two planets colliding and destroying which were being pushed by ****ing Source/ALE entity.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
I still don't.
See my point now?
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
I still don't.
http://i916.photobucket.com/albums/ad9/ThorOdinson/Thanos0607.jpg
http://i916.photobucket.com/albums/ad9/ThorOdinson/Thanos0608.jpg
http://i916.photobucket.com/albums/ad9/ThorOdinson/Thanos0610.jpg
By Jim starlin, superman surviving two planets colliding without any scratch
http://i1007.photobucket.com/albums/af191/lgu88/Superman/Crazy%20Feats/DeathOfTheNewGods08a.jpg
http://i1007.photobucket.com/albums/af191/lgu88/Superman/Crazy%20Feats/DeathOfTheNewGods08b.jpg
http://i1007.photobucket.com/albums/af191/lgu88/Superman/Crazy%20Feats/DeathOfTheNewGods08c.jpg
Superman was actually in a better condition than Galan.
😂
Suck it Thor.
w00t
Two planets colliding+nukes > a Moon.
Superman is not in this thread.
Originally posted by zopzop
Let me spell it out in simple terms :
Geriatric King Thor may very well beat H/P Doomsday but using that moon shattering feat as proof of him doing so is meaningless because :
a) Herald level beings have accomplished more than that on panel when fighting (H/P was crushing herald level beings)
b) The attack that put down Geriatric King Thor didn't cause any collateral damageSee my point now?
I see your point. So......you want to disregard the entire feat?
And again, my point: it does NOT matter what the herald level beings did or did not do, only what DD did. I did not see DD outputting any strength levels similar to what Galactus used to fail in putting KT down.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Two planets colliding+nukes > a Moon.Superman is not in this thread.
I see your point. So......you want to disregard the entire feat?
And again, my point: it does NOT matter what the herald level beings did or did not do, only what DD did. I did not see DD outputting any strength levels similar to what Galactus used to fail in putting KT down.
Doomsday is pretty much defined to be more durable than Superman.
👆
Lol. Let's forget Old G punching Old King Thor through the earth and then into obliterating the moon. How that is being lowballed I will never understand. The real key here is that he did not punch a meta or a herald. He punched a skyfather(or at least a high trans) level opponent in that feat for crying out loud!
I just can't believe that feat is being lowballed. And to see a supposed "similar" situation is being brought up which consequently pales in comparison by leaps and bounds as ammo for argument is downright comical.
