Originally posted by Tzeentch
How do you conclusively prove, in a legal environment, that someone is "not informed and/or does not fully understand the complexity of sexual relations"? Age isn't a good point of reference, because past 15 years old or so, the rate at which people mature fluctuates rapidly, and there is almost no difference from year-to-year (eg. one could reasonably assume that an 18-year old is wiser than a 10-year old by a significant margin, however the difference in wisdom between an 18-year old and a 17-year old is almost non-existent).
Another name in the past year to add to the Top 50 list, which needs to get longer - Kalee Warnick. (To be fair, she is continuing to plead Not Guilty to the charges, for now.)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/08/kalee-warnick_n_3727274.html
This one, Laura Whitehurst, not only had the baby of of one 16 year old student, she got released four months into a year long prison sentence!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/09/laura-whitehurst-released_n_4567425.html
One of her students felt no regrets at all for the affair.
This is the youngest boy I've heard of yet - 11 years old, and a 36 year old woman who had his baby.
Never heard of this film before - a 1961 exploitation melodrama about a stripper's romance with a 17 year old (but actually has a bit of critical respect.)
http://www.amazon.com/A-Cold-Wind-In-August/dp/B009H0PHES
http://scaredshiftlessinshasta.blogspot.ca/2013/03/its-all-about-benjamins.html
Thats not really the point.
If the older woman did like it, you wouldn't be in a position to refuse. As an adult, she could have easily coerced you into doing it. So even if you say yes, the fact is that you're not in a position to say no. That's why its called rape.
So while mostly it was a joke, it also serves to illustrate why its still a bad thing to happen to you.