Just as an addendum, a 14 year old girl saying she enjoyed sex with an older man will likely be faced with two opposite stereotypes (from different people she may encounter) namely the people viewing her as a dumb, brainwashed victim and the people who would view her as a "****" (derogatory term for women who have what people deem "too much" sex), neither of which is a desirable thing to be cast as.
Originally posted by SamZED
Right, wonder what tipped me off...🙄
That you lack the higher cognitive functions to detect sarcasm is not a surprise.
I don't "support" banging boys.
Yet you think those that do so should get away scot-free.
Or men for that matter. Not my thing.
I wasn't implying that you were gay.
I'm just pointing out the obvious difference between boys and girls having a sexual experience with an adult. It's simple really.
It's really not, it is only your simple mind that leads you to believe such.
It happens to a little girl, in most cases it's going to be an emotional trauma she'll carry throughout her entire life.
Based on?
It happens to a boy, in most cases he'll be freaked out at first but it will end being the most exciting thing that's ever happened to him in his entire life and he'll be bragging about it to his friends decades later even.
Based on?
The fact that you're brainwashed into thinking that the same kind of logic has to be applied for both genders (because God forbid someone accuses you of being sexist!) doesn't make what I said any less true.
That you would accuse me of trying to be politically correct is nothing short of hilarious.
Let me make one thing clear: I am a misogynist. I do not like women, and have no illusions about that fact like some cowardly whoresons do. I just happen to be intelligent enough to disallow my personal biases from interfering with my sense of reason.
Now that I've gotten that out of the way...
You seem to think that grown women diddling little kids is hey man A-OK, because you seem to think that "lawl they will just like it eventually". What is your basis for this broad, sweeping generalization? This is a rhetorical question because I am already aware that you lack anything resembling evidence for this assertion.
Girls mature faster than boys. Girls start having sexual feelings about whoever their orientation favors before boys do. Your stance is founded upon antiquated notions that the male sex lusts more often and more intensely than the female sex does. So yes, you're forcing gender roles upon people who you do not know personally, yet you are making a broad stating about how they reacted and how they will react for years to come.
I actually know two guys IRL who were molested as children by older females, and they don't brag about it, one revealed it to me while drunk and upset years ago (We were like 16-17) in fact. But of course you believe that she did nothing wrong and he should just sack up and think it a blessing, right lol?
http://www.scu.edu/wellness/topics/family/malesexabuse.cfm
Educate yourself.
Originally posted by SamZED
Don't dumb down my post.
How do you dumb down a post that is already stupid?
Originally posted by Bardock42
Just as an addendum, a 14 year old girl saying she enjoyed sex with an older man will likely be faced with two opposite stereotypes (from different people she may encounter) namely the people viewing her as a dumb, brainwashed victim and the people who would view her as a "****" (derogatory term for women who have what people deem "too much" sex), neither of which is a desirable thing to be cast as.
Whereas the boy will be expected to be delighted with the experience and if he confesses to having not he will be a "pussy" or a "sausage-smoking fudge-packer".
Originally posted by NemeBro
Whereas the boy will be expected to be delighted with the experience and if he confesses to having not he will be a "pussy" or a "sausage-smoking fudge-packer".
I totally agree, I addressed that in my post before the last, hence why I added what a girl would go through in the opposite scenario.
Originally posted by RobtardIn my argument not once did I say "all" or "every" only "more than" or "most of". And I do believe that most boys would feel differently about it than most girls. You think it's the same for both genders. Let's leave it at that and agree to disagree. Like I told Bardock I'm done arguing.
It is indeed sexist, but that's only [a big] part of the issue.You're making blanket-claims that all 14 year old boys couldn't be traumetized from being molested by an older woman, when the fact remains not all kids react the same and ignores that it's still molestation.
As Bardock mentioned, the sexism issue could lead to a 14 year old boy bragging when he's really emotionaly (possibly physically) traumatized, because he's expected to and someone with your mindset might degrade him if he didn't "man-up" over it.
So by your set of views, if a 14 year old girl "bragged" or seemed in a general positive mood about being sodomized by a 50 year old man, that would not be molestation and/or okay. This is your argument.
Originally posted by NephthysPeople like to forget that a lot of those male on female statutory rape charges with the male teachers happen to be consensual (For lack of better term).
I'm curious, don't a lot of girl get infatuated with their teachers? I wonder how that would be seen. **** or victim?
Clearly they also enjoyed it and the man should get away scot-free as well.
As to your question, generally when underage they are thought of as the "dumb victims" when with an authority figure. There are exceptions though, like Dolores Haze, who clearly seduced her alleged abuser.
Originally posted by SamZED
In my argument not once did I say "all" or "every" only "more than" or "most of". And I do believe that most boys would feel differently about it than most girls. You think it's the same for both genders. Let's leave it at that and agree to disagree. Like I told Bardock I'm done arguing.
Coward.
Originally posted by NemeBro
Let me make one thing clear: I am a misogynist.
>:[
Originally posted by NemeBro
People like to forget that a lot of those male on female statutory rape charges with the male teachers happen to be consensual (For lack of better term).Clearly they also enjoyed it and the man should get away scot-free as well.
As to your question, generally when underage they are thought of as the "dumb victims" when with an authority figure. There are exceptions though, like Dolores Haze, who clearly seduced her alleged abuser.
Double standards more like dumble standards. Because they're dumb.
Underage sex is totes wrong for both genders.
Originally posted by NemeBro
That you lack the higher cognitive functions to detect sarcasm is not a surprise.
Educate yourself
Also..
Based on?
Originally posted by SamZED
Like I told Bardock I'm done arguing.
Originally posted by SamZEDSo what you're saying is that I used the word correctly?
Don't know what that was but that wasn't sarcasm. Speaking of small minds, try taking your own advice and..http://www.wordcentral.com/cgi-bin/student?sarcasm
Also..
I hope your higher cognitive functions and reason do not effect your ability to read:
[b]Great timing. Welcome to my ignore list.
👆 [/B]
Good good.