Hansel and Gretel vs Voldemort

Originally posted by Robtard
You champion a guy who saw an infant as a threat to his goals 😂 <--- @ you

Bragging that his cowardly-hero was able to kick a 15 year old's ass. What a show of bravery. End of the last film, Harry (now 17) kicked the shit out of Voldermort, this is a film fact; stop ignoring facts.

Voldemort won.

Quit ignoring the context of the final film.

Originally posted by Robtard
That's cos of the standing restraining order he has in all 50 states.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Quit being upset younger women still find me attractive.

If that helps you cope, Foreveraloneguy 🙂

Originally posted by quanchi112
Bavmorda also saw a person as a baby a threat. It's about the prophecy you fool. Great villains aren't scared of achieving their goals.

Voldemort won.

Quit ignoring the context of the final film.

Bavmorda is also a coward 🙂

Wrong again. Voldermort was defeated in the series 🙂

The most powerful dark wizard in HP was outplayed anddefeated by a 17 year old boy-wizard; that's the context of the final film 🙂

Originally posted by Robtard
If that helps you cope, Foreveraloneguy 🙂

Bavmorda is also a coward 🙂

Wrong again. Voldermort was defeated in the series 🙂

The most powerful dark wizard in HP was outplayed anddefeated by a 17 year old boy-wizard; that's the context of the final film 🙂

No, it is about achieving ones goals.

Context. Harry let others die and hid from him for years. Cowardly.

If you're moving the goalpost to "achieving ones goals" now, then Voldermort is still a coward and a failure, as being outplayed by Potter and dying wasn't a life-goal of his. Good job 👆

Originally posted by Robtard
If you're moving the goalpost to "achieving ones goals" now, then Voldermort is still a coward and a failure, as being outplayed by Potter and dying wasn't a life-goal of his. Good job 👆

Originally posted by quanchi112
I said the guy is brave which he is.

He wins this thread with a few simple unforgivables.

He's a coward who attacks babies and gets outplayed by teenagers, despite being the most powerful dark wizard in his franchise.

He does not, he dies a coward again from a hail of bullets.

Originally posted by Robtard
He's a coward who attacks babies and gets outplayed by teenagers, despite being the most powerful dark wizard in his franchise.

He does not, he dies la coward again from a hail of bullets.

Crucio, Avada Kedavra. That's a wrap.

Originally posted by quanchi112
He doesn't stop no matter what age Harry was. That is called courage.

Crucio, Avada Kedavra. That's a wrap.

😂 He lost to an infant and then a 17 year old. He's a coward.

Bullets are faster than spells, especially spells that won't work on two people who happen to be immune to magic.

You can't accept these facts, so do more flips 🙂

Originally posted by Robtard
😂 He lost to an infant and then a 17 year old. He's a coward.

Bullets are faster than spells, especially spells that won't work on two people who happen to be immune to magic.

You can't accept these facts, so do more flips 🙂

Harry also beat Tommy when he was 11 and again at 12.

Hansel and Gretel > Voldemort. Close thread nao.

Originally posted by Robtard
😂 He lost to an infant and then a 17 year old. He's a coward.

Bullets are faster than spells, especially spells that won't work on two people who happen to be immune to magic.

You can't accept these facts, so do more flips 🙂

Crucio. Voldemort has quicker reflexes and can possess one of them.

Prove they are resistant to VoldeVerse magic.

Originally posted by quanchi112
It is like saying Superman lost to thugs and ignoring knite.

That's essentially how you debate. Context.

Crucio. Voldemort has quicker reflexes and can possess one of them.

Prove they are resistant to VoldeVerse magic.

That's an argument you've made against Superman 🙂

Voldermort lost to Harry cos Harry outplayed him. This is in the film, but you ignore facts, that's how you debate 🙂

Back to shifting the burden of proof tactics. It's for you to prove Voldermort's spells will work on beings who are immune to spells/magic. You can't do this; you know it; why you cry 🙂

Originally posted by Robtard
That's an argument you've made against Superman 🙂

Voldermort lost to Harry cos Harry outplayed him. This is in the film, but you ignore facts, that's how you debate 🙂

Back to shifting the burden of proof tactics. It's for you to prove Voldermort's spells will work on beings who are immune to spells/magic. You can't do this; you know it; why you cry 🙂

😂

No, Harry had loads of help. Suggesting it was just Harry doing it all is lying or not understanding the films. It's you so I can't really say for sure at this point.

No, since their immunity only applies to their magic not all outside foreign magics.

😂

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, since their immunity only applies to their magic not all outside foreign magics.

😂

Equivelancy rules. You can't remove a character trait in a vs match. Your the one who has to prove that the spell can overwhelm the immunity.

Voldemort is not Thanos, or Galactus, he is not going to overwhelm the immunity, and certainly not because he has differing magics. Hell, his entire defeat was brought about due to a powerful ward of protection spell.

Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
Equivelancy rules. You can't remove a character trait in a vs match. Your the one who has to prove that the spell can overwhelm the immunity.

Voldemort is not Thanos, or Galactus, he is not going to overwhelm the immunity, and certainly not because he has differing magics. Hell, his entire defeat was brought about due to a powerful ward of protection spell.

They are only immune to H and G magic.

Originally posted by quanchi112
So you agree the power does make a difference thus destroying your own case. All magical power is not equal. You just destroyed yourself.

They are only immune to H and G magic.

The difference is I don't subscribe to no limit fallacies. However AK has not shown capable of overwhelming the threshhold required to break immunity. The ball is still in your court to prove AK can overwhelm that immunity champ, just parroting the words "Different Magics" doesn't cut it, as you cannot explain how that even works. Under that mentality, I can lay claim that AK won't work on any thing outside of Potterverse, under your own logic, I would be correct.

Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
The difference is I don't subscribe to no limit fallacies. However AK has not shown capable of overwhelming the threshhold required to break immunity. The ball is still in your court to prove AK can overwhelm that immunity champ, just parroting the words "Different Magics" doesn't cut it, as you cannot explain how that even works. Under that mentality, I can lay claim that AK won't work on any thing outside of Potterverse, under your own logic, I would be correct.

Ak works. I never said the abilities in the H and G verse don't work. You don't seem to understand the difference between the two.

Sigh.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You already said power level matters thus destroying the claim by your own logic that they are immune to all foreign magics.

Well then, prove AK has the power to overcome immunity. Voldemort has proved on 2 occasions that a ward of sufficient power thwarts AK.

And no, you again try to twist my words. I said Voldemort is not Thanos, or Galactus, he is not overwhelming immunity through sheer power difference.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Ak works. I never said the abilities in the H and G verse don't work. You don't seem to understand the difference between the two.

Sigh.

Why should it work through immunity to general magic? You never explained this outside of "Different Magics" and even that was half assed.

Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
Well then, prove AK has the power to overcome immunity. Voldemort has proved on 2 occasions that a ward of sufficient power thwarts AK.

And no, you again try to twist my words. I said Voldemort is not Thanos, or Galactus, he is not overwhelming immunity through sheer power difference.

Why should it work through immunity to general magic? You never explained this outside of "Different Magics" and even that was half assed.

You said power levels matter hence all magics are not created equally.

You already conceded the point.