Originally posted by carver9
Because Superman changed that. The end he read didn't happen due to fate but he did read the last page per his words. I wouldn't say he was lying either because the name in the last chapter and literally every thing he said was happening minus Man killing all.
What did the book contain?
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
What did the book contain?
The last page that Ultraman read. Just because something is named infinite book or pages doesn't mean that it is true. Lol... Juggernaut is called "the Unstoppable Juggernaut and has been halted at least 3 times to my recollection. Batman is called the world greatest detective. Thor had possession of the infinite stone, is there proof that it provides infinite power.
Is there proof that the book contains infinite pages?
Originally posted by carver9
The last page that Ultraman read. Just because something is named infinite book or pages doesn't mean that it is true. Lol... Juggernaut is called "the Unstoppable Juggernaut and has been halted at least 3 times to my recollection. Batman is called the world greatest detective. Thor had possession of the infinite stone, is there proof that it provides infinite power.Is there proof that the book contains infinite pages?
It's quite clear what the author intended because of the MULTIPLE TIMES "infinite pages" or similar things were said. Yet, you cling to the one thing Ultraman said, and ignore that ge contradicted himself. Even he said it had infinite pages.
No, what happened is that Ultraman was wrong, and you're making arguments to try and justify your stance. You have very poor reading comprehension and always use a warped version of the confirmation bias fallacy, like how you argued Superman facing that Sun-Eater that when exploded was 50 times the size of the Kepler supernova remnant, was a lie, because your reading comprehension is shit.
Originally posted by Delta1938
It's quite clear what the author intended because of the MULTIPLE TIMES "infinite pages" or similar things were said. Yet, you cling to the one thing Ultraman said, and ignore that ge contradicted himself. Even he said it had infinite pages.No, what happened is that Ultraman was wrong, and you're making arguments to try and justify your stance. You have very poor reading comprehension and always use a warped version of the confirmation bias fallacy, like how you argued Superman facing that Sun-Eater that when exploded was 50 times the size of the Kepler supernova remnant, was a lie, because your reading comprehension is shit.
Lol...so the author naming a book something then turning around and going against the name of the book by the saying Ultraman read the final chapter, last page of the infinite book proves that I'm wrong? WTF. You probably need to twitter the writer because he is the one that said Ultraman read the final pages, not me.
Lol, Kent himself said that the story he was telling could be false. Stop changing the subject and stay on topic.
Originally posted by carver9
Lol...so the author naming a book something then turning around and going against the name of the book by the saying Ultraman read the final chapter, last page of the infinite book proves that I'm wrong? WTF. You probably need to twitter the writer because he is the one that said Ultraman read the final pages, not me.Lol, Kent himself said that the story he was telling could be false. Stop changing the subject and stay on topic.
The burden of proof lies on you to prove Ultraman was right. Clearly he wasn't. Your strawgrasping explanation isn't enough, when multiple statements contradict your insistence he read the final page.
Incorrect. Your reading comprehension showed you took the entire thing as a lie because she was lied about what they went out for. And this is totally relevant to my point, as your deflecting proves my point.
Originally posted by Surtur
If we use feats from that story then it would mean Superman has infinite strength. Or wait he needed help so his strength is only half of infinity which of course is still infinity. Which means Superman should never ever struggle with any strength feat.
Are we about to get another one of your famous "No that feat doesn't count!!" meltdowns?
Originally posted by Delta1938
Are we about to get another one of your famous "No that feat doesn't count!!" meltdowns?
Okay first off stop using words that don't apply. A "meltdown" is a gross exaggeration. I'm simply saying if you want to say it does count then how do we quantify it because we have seen Superman struggle with certain things before thus showing his strength isn't infinite so how do you reconcile that?
You shouldn't take every single feat as gospel, especially in characters like Superman who have a shitload of appearances in comics.
I'm not saying for sure it doesn't count, I'm just saying if you want to say it does count then how do we handle that feat? What do we use it to say?
Originally posted by Surtur
Okay first off stop using words that don't apply. A "meltdown" is a gross exaggeration. I'm simply saying if you want to say it does count then how do we quantify it because we have seen Superman struggle with certain things before thus showing his strength isn't infinite so how do you reconcile that?You shouldn't take every single feat as gospel, especially in characters like Superman who have a shitload of appearances in comics.
I'm not saying for sure it doesn't count, I'm just saying if you want to say it does count then how do we handle that feat? What do we use it to say?
"Exaggeration." Yes.
Just because I argue a feat is legit doesn't mean I argue it's how Superman is every single appearance(barring Plot-Device weakened shenanigans). But so many haters do everything they can to go, "Nope, that's not what it was" so of course I've gotta argue it.
We use it to say Superman's done this.
Originally posted by Delta1938
The burden of proof lies on you to prove Ultraman was right. Clearly he wasn't. Your strawgrasping explanation isn't enough, when multiple statements contradict your insistence he read the final page.Incorrect. Your reading comprehension showed you took the entire thing as a lie because she was lied about what they went out for. And this is totally relevant to my point, as your deflecting proves my point.
Why do I have to prove that the name of something is actually true. It can't be true since Ultraman flipped to the final chapter and read the last page. He flipped through every page until he couldn't flip anymore which means the name of a book is what? Just a name.
Originally posted by carver9
The last page that Ultraman read. Just because something is named infinite book or pages doesn't mean that it is true. Lol... Juggernaut is called "the Unstoppable Juggernaut and has been halted at least 3 times to my recollection. Batman is called the world greatest detective. Thor had possession of the infinite stone, is there proof that it provides infinite power.Is there proof that the book contains infinite pages?
Lol, no, I meant, what was the book?