Superman vs Namor/Hercules

Originally posted by Delta1938
"Exaggeration." Yes.

Just because I argue a feat is legit doesn't mean I argue it's how Superman is every single appearance(barring Plot-Device weakened shenanigans). But so many haters do everything they can to go, "Nope, that's not what it was" so of course I've gotta argue it.

We use it to say Superman's done this.

So then in a normal fight with Superman is the feat usable to you, yes or no?

Would it be a valid way to debate if I said "Superman is stronger then this other character because he lifted half of infinity"?

For instance: Superman punches off Namor and Hercules head due to infinite strength. Both Hercules and Namor have been injured by people who do not have infinite strength.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Cool,so you have no idea of the context behind the scans you're using to try and debunk the feat.

Its ok, not all of us can actually read and remember a pretty important plot point.

OR you can ya know, say what you got to say and stop beating around the Bush.

Originally posted by carver9
Lol...so the author naming a book something then turning around and going against the name of the book by the saying Ultraman read the final chapter, last page of the infinite book proves that I'm wrong? WTF. You probably need to twitter the writer because he is the one that said Ultraman read the final pages, not me.

Lol, Kent himself said that the story he was telling could be false. Stop changing the subject and stay on topic.

In mathematics, there are an infinite number of rational numbers between 0 and 100. Also the rational numbers can be put in a counting order (they are countably infinite).

I'm not sure why we're even remotely trying to apply logic to this story. It's just the feats are not able to even be quantified. What really is the point? Is the outcome of this fight really going to depend on this silly infinite pages thing? When they already contradict themselves by needing two people to lift something of infinite weight. They don't even know what words mean.

Originally posted by Surtur
So then in a normal fight with Superman is the feat usable to you, yes or no?

Would it be a valid way to debate if I said "Superman is stronger then this other character because he lifted half of infinity"?

For instance: Superman punches off Namor and Hercules head due to infinite strength. Both Hercules and Namor have been injured by people who do not have infinite strength.

If I were to argue the way you're trying to dismiss the feat, you'd say if would count for everybody he fights. It's a feat almost nobody has done or done similar. Deal with it.

Originally posted by Surtur
I'm not sure why we're even remotely trying to apply logic to this story. It's just the feats are not able to even be quantified. What really is the point? Is the outcome of this fight really going to depend on this silly infinite pages thing? When they already contradict themselves by needing two people to lift something of infinite weight. They don't even know what words mean.

Except people who argue he needed help either never read it or are really good at assuming. He never actually tried and failed solo, thus this "he needed help" is invalid.

And it's being argued because we're proving Carter will dance around shit if he even acknowledges it, as he dodged this topic once questions started being asked that destroyed his arguments and he only came back because I kept telling him he does exactly this. So he's proving me right.

Also Carter, you ignored my other question. Don't play stupid, if you forget, go back to where I bumped things.

I can deal with the fact it happened, but you talk about feats and all this and I'm still trying to figure out..would you use this feat or not? In terms of a fight?

The feat happened, I'm not saying we deny that. Just wondering in what capacity we can use it.

Originally posted by h1a8
just because something has a last page or point doesn't mean it doesn't have an infinite number of things within it.

In mathematics, there are an infinite number of rational numbers between 0 and 100. Also the rational numbers can be put in a counting order (they are countably infinite).

😂

I swear you guys can't see yourselves.

^^^ Here comes the thread shitter

Superman wins easily.
He has ranged attacks (can attack from afar).
He can freeze one for a moment while he koes the other.
His HV is also devastating.

Originally posted by h1a8
Superman wins easily.
He has ranged attacks (can attack from afar).
He can freeze one for a moment while he koes the other.
His HV is also devastating.

When does he ever win easily? This is Superman from the comics, not the one you created in your mind.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Cool,so you have no idea of the context behind the scans you're using to try and debunk the feat.

Its ok, not all of us can actually read and remember a pretty important plot point.

Oooo, Saint's got a secret! Enough sexual tension with you and Carver, just spit it out and return the stolen topic.

Originally posted by Blue Area Vet
When does he ever win easily? This is Superman from the comics, not the one you created in your mind.

Originally posted by Surtur
I can deal with the fact it happened, but you talk about feats and all this and I'm still trying to figure out..would you use this feat or not? In terms of a fight?

The feat happened, I'm not saying we deny that. Just wondering in what capacity we can use it.

I already explained. Reread.

Originally posted by Blue Area Vet
When does he ever win easily? This is Superman from the comics, not the one you created in your mind.

Superman can one-shot them both. The other way around is unlikely without extenuating circumstances.

Originally posted by Delta1938
I already explained. Reread.

Superman can one-shot them both. The other way around is unlikely without extenuating circumstances.

Originally posted by Delta1938
I already explained. Reread.

Superman can one-shot them both. The other way around is unlikely without extenuating circumstances.

👆

Carter, you're still dodging DS's questions.

DS is lame.

👆

Originally posted by carver9
DS is lame.

You're proving my point.

So, carter is still avoiding the multiple questions that destroy his arguments in this topic.

Also, Superman wins. Definitively.