Sylar/Peter vs Surfer

Originally posted by Supra
What out Epic, he thinks cause he's a CEO, he is better then all of us.

You seize the opportunity when presented. Smart move. But I think you should have said something other than "he thinks...he is better then all of us", although that could be effective.

Originally posted by Placidity
You seize the opportunity when presented. Smart move. But I think you should have said something other than "he thinks...he is better then all of us", although that could be effective.

You said so yourself, do I need to link and quote you doing it?

Originally posted by Placidity
It wasn't.

Originally posted by Placidity

That is YOUR interpretation of what happened. As such, it holds no weight.

The thing about the biased is that they are blind to it. If only you saw who the idiot truly was.

Originally posted by Epicurus
Excellent.👆

Ok, so feats from the movies don't count. Got it.

You must know that I know that you just signalled your concession by committing a non-response and a strawman so obvious even Supra would spot it with his eyes closed?

Originally posted by Supra
You said so yourself, do I need to link and quote you doing it?

I wasn't even challenging you above, but go ahead 🙂

Originally posted by Placidity
You must know that I know that you just signalled your concession by committing a non-response and a strawman so obvious even Supra would spot it with his eyes closed?

I wasn't even challenging you above, but go ahead 🙂

I'll save you the embarrassment of basically telling us we are nothing because your a "CEO" and you lose respect for people who challenge you.

Yeah the global stuff and Johnny were a side effect
Would the death tears work on him?

Originally posted by Supra
I'll save you the embarrassment of basically telling us we are nothing because your a "CEO" and you lose respect for people who challenge you.

Oh dear. Your comprehension skills are so sub-par it is shocking. I wasn't even aware of it until only now that you've tried to explain what you thought I said in my post.

It is a good thing you did not quote my post, sure would've been embarrassing.

But seriously, wow. You must be just a little kid, you must be...

Originally posted by Placidity
You must know that I know that you just signalled your concession by committing a non-response and a strawman so obvious even Supra would spot it with his eyes closed?

I can appreciate your tactics. Very simple, definitely crude, but it undoubtedly works, and you are smart enough to know it works.

Originally posted by Placidity
I can appreciate your tactics. Very simple, definitely crude, but it undoubtedly works, and you are smart enough to know it works.

Originally posted by Epicurus
I accept your concession.👆

Originally posted by Placidity

[b]Concede:

admit or agree that something is true after first denying or resisting it.
[/B]

Even after I provided you with a definition of the word, you continue to use it in a nonsensical way.

Epicurus' Status: Full Retard Confirmed.

Originally posted by Placidity
Even after I provided you with a definition of the word, you continue to use it in a nonsensical way.

Epicurus' Status: Full Retard Confirmed.

I think you suffer from DID, seeing how you continuously confuse yourself with me.

Originally posted by Epicurus
Considering your admission that my tactics were highly effective despite being crude and simple, that does count as a concession on your part.

No it doesn't.

Tactics implied diversion and underhandedness, not success. Don't kid yourself, you couldn't win an honest intellectual debate. Heck, I'm not sure you would even win in an ad hominem argument even by going full retard against Supra.

Originally posted by Placidity
No it doesn't.

Tactics implied diversion and underhandedness, not success. Don't kid yourself, you couldn't win an honest intellectual debate. Heck, I'm not sure you would even win in an ad hominem argument even by going full retard against Supra.

Lol, considering you're the one who derailed this thread by bringing up posts of mine entirely removed from this thread, I'd say there's definitely a tinge of irony when you accuse me of "underhanded tactics", you silly goose.

Originally posted by Epicurus
Yes it does.

Lol, considering you're the one who derailed this thread by bringing up posts of mine entirely removed from this thread, I'd say there's definitely a tinge of irony when you accuse me of "underhanded tactics", you silly goose.

It was not "removed" at all. You were applying different standards to Manhattan than you did in this thread.

It's too bad you've went for the "Oh damn, I was caught so now I must talk smack until thread gets closed so I don't have to own up to my hypocrisy and bias" tactic. It was a decent thread.

Originally posted by Placidity
It was not "removed" at all. You were applying different standards to Manhattan than you did in this thread.

It's too bad you've went for the "Oh damn, I was caught so now I must talk smack until thread gets closed so I don't have to own up to my hypocrisy and bias" tactic. It was a decent thread.

It's too bad that you tried to act as if the shoe was on the other foot to begin with, got a good butt-whacking and have now been reduced to D-grade trollery. Don't worry, butthurt seems to have that effect on people.

Originally posted by Epicurus
Of course it was. I asked for onscreen proof that Manhattan has entropy/time manip in that other thread. As opposed to me openly admitting that I am speculating with regards to making the "pocket dimension/tesseract space" comments about Surfer's board trapping feat. Try and keep up, Mr Slowpoke.

You made the same comment earlier, I already de-constructed and responded to this.

By the way, why are you trying to change your posts back to a somewhat rational style? You must realize you will only lose if you engage me at this level right (as you did before)?

Originally posted by Placidity
You made the same comment earlier, I already de-constructed and responded to this.

By the way, why are you trying to change your posts back to a somewhat rational style? You must realize you will only lose if you engage me at this level right (as you did before)?

You do realize you aren't the first idiot I've had to deal with on these forums, right? Just so you get some perspective, the last looney toon to have gone up against me got a permaban. You sure you want to try your luck?

Originally posted by Epicurus
your attempt to make your opponent argue with himself backfired spectacularly in your face.

Do you really believe this? I'm wondering if you are that delusional. You started with an emotional, yet rational response, which was destroyed, then you started using the "full retard" method to hide from the debate and to induce a close on this thread. Are you really patting yourself on the back? I gave you credit for being smart enough to know when to disengage and try something else, but maybe you really are just deluded.

Originally posted by Epicurus

You do realize you aren't the first idiot I've had to deal with on these forums, right? Just so you get some perspective, the last looney toon to have gone up against me got a permaban. You sure you want to try your luck?

Oh, I'm almost scared now. Tell me more about your powers, it is fascinating.

I have to admit, you made me chuckle.

Originally posted by Placidity
Do you really believe this? I'm wondering if you are that delusional. You started with an emotional, yet rational response, which was destroyed, then you started using the "full retard" method to hide from the debate. Are you really patting yourself on the back? I gave you credit for being smart enough to know when to disengage and try something else, but maybe you really are just deluded.

If you want to get a real look at deluded, I'd suggest looking yourself in the mirror.🙂

Originally posted by Placidity

Oh, I'm almost scared now. Tell me more about your powers, it is fascinating.

I have to admit, you made me chuckle.