Homosexuality Thread (Serious Debate Please)

Started by MidnightSpectre18 pages

Originally posted by Nephthys
1) Because they're assholes.
2) Because they're different.
Pretty much this.

Re: Re: Homosexuality Thread ( Serious Debate Please )

Originally posted by Impediment
1) Because homophobic people are small minded dumb asses who are no better than racist white people from the 50's and 60's who called black people "n*ggers".

2) Because they don't conform to the lifestyles of ancient minded people who think that people and society should not evolve to a higher plane of thinking and living.

👆 (Sorry for the double post)

Originally posted by Firefly218
Come on guys, no need to be so hateful. Homophobe bigots are people too. Stupid people, but people nonetheless.

Being people nets you nice behavior? Since when?

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
Being people nets you nice behavior? Since when?

If it were truer than society would be great. Being a person should net good behavior.

But that works both ways.

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
But that works both ways.

Speaking of homosexuality...

That's bisexual, you racist.

I'm a black, Jewish, Lesbian, Native American, disabled war-veteran: it is impossible for me to be racist!

Unless your racist towards your own race

Originally posted by dadudemon
Speaking of homosexuality...
Originally posted by dadudemon
I'm a black, Jewish, Lesbian, Native American, disabled war-veteran: it is impossible for me to be racist!

Your sheer hate for asians and irish people shows 👇

🙁

Originally posted by Firefly218
Come on guys, no need to be so hateful. Homophobe bigots are people too. Stupid people, but people nonetheless.

Once again, selflessness and tolerance has nothing to do with intelligence. You can be racist, sexist, anti-gay, and still be be able to work advanced forms of logical calculi.

Is that your definition of intelligence, Astner? To "be able to work advanced forms of logical calculi"?

Originally posted by Bardock42
Is that your definition of intelligence, Astner? To "be able to work advanced forms of logical calculi"?

It's definitely a qualifying factor of a certain type of intelligence, but I wouldn't say that it's general enough to make a definition. Humility, on the other hand, isn't indicative of intelligence whatsoever.

If I were to bring up stats which showcased a positive correlation between humble people with higher IQ, and racist/sexist/bigoted/homophobic people having relatively lower IQ, what conclusion would you draw from it Astner?

Originally posted by Epicurus
If I were to bring up stats which showcased a positive correlation between humble people with higher IQ, and racist/sexist/bigoted/homophobic people having relatively lower IQ, what conclusion would you draw from it Astner?

That depends on the study. I've always been a convert on all fronts.

From what I've experienced in the academic elite the contrary is more likely to hold true. While someone with a Ph.D in economical statistics might not treat a waiter like shit, there's definitely a sense of entitlement and elitism present.

Then we have people like David Hilbert—who developed the mathematics foe special- and general relativity for Einstein—and Karl Schwarzschild—child prodigy and one of the most outstanding physicists who've ever lived—who even treated their fellow mathematicians and physicists like dirt for not being on their level.

So the conclusion to draw is that, humans suck.

Not all of them, just the ones that are different in any way.

I totally agree with the sentiment, my only issue is that I can never remember whether dark haired or light haired people are the ones that are different.