How GREAT Lord of the Rings is compared to Harry Potter and how it COPIED LOTR.

Started by cermiestar8 pages

Frank Herbet? Bet he didn't charge £16.99 for a half good book that took years to come out.

Originally posted by cermiestar
La la.
Firstly, Harry Potter is just a badly made kids movie. Please don't hurt me. But I think if you're going to make a movie out of harry Potter, they could have done it better ie. by not letting Chris Columbus do it.
Harry Potter is a good book sure, no doubnt about that one. But can you believe the EXTORSHINIST prices you now have to pay to get your hands on one of these books? The new one is costing £16.99 (I don't know how much that is in dollars) but all this stuff about getting kids to read more is bull. If the kids want to read more then the whole thing is just exploited by the publishing companies. £16.99! She's a bloody billionaire anyway! Nearly every kid in Britain is going to have one. When kids find a book they want to read their parents just end up being exploited. That really isn't what the point of this thread is about but I just had to have a rant about that.
Any opinions anyone?

Well, cos I thought ahead and ordered it off amazon, its only costing me £8.48...

And the movie was great, chris is great, and i doubt the new director will be as good...

can I be juvenile and stick my tongue out... No, that will probably undermine my point...

Anyone would probly be better than Chris

I don't get what you were saying about Herbert, Cermiestar.

What do you mean by 16.99 pounds sterling?

Who's frank Herbet?

Ok, this has just become silly now... closing.