Batman: Arkham Knight

Witcher in May, this in June. Hot diggity daffodil.

Originally posted by Impediment
Delayed, yet again, until June 23.

it doesn't matter as long as i play this..

How many people suspect that Scarecrow's toxin will affect Batman and trigger a hallucination of the Joker? How awesome would it be if Mark Hamill reprised his role once more as a surprise?

Originally posted by Impediment
Delayed, yet again, until June 23.

Nightwing,Robin,Catwoman playable?Co-op confirmed?
YouTube video

Yooo that looks like 3 player co-op that'd be SO RAD GIVE ME CO-OP CHALLENGE MAPS

You know how you can switch between three different characters in GTAV? Possibly the same thing in Arkham Knight.

That's...also cool I suppose.

I was bummed you didn't get to explore Arkham City as Robin or Nightwing

In Arkham City's Harley's Revenge DLC you could kinda explore the city as Robin, though it was a little more closed off than the main story.

But yeah, I wouldn't jump to the conclusion about co-op yet. If it is a thing though, I hope that's not what they delayed this game for and that it's not a forced thing, although the idea of co-op challenge maps does sound kinda appealing admittedly. Just no co-op for main story plz.

Originally posted by Ridley_Prime
In Arkham City's Harley's Revenge DLC you could kinda explore the city as Robin, though it was a little more closed off than the main story.

But yeah, I wouldn't jump to the conclusion about co-op yet. If it is a thing though, I hope that's not what they delayed this game for and that it's not a forced thing, although the idea of co-op challenge maps does sound kinda appealing admittedly. Just no co-op for main story plz.

For the DLC I thought you were indoors the whole time as Robin. In some warehouse or something

That was a good chunk of it, but you were also outside in the city a little from what I remember.

You were able to explore the mill as Robin, not the city.

Technically outside, but not the city.

Apparently the characters are swapped during combat.

So, the season pass will be 40 dollars/23 pounds, i'd guess about 30 euro.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2015-04-28-the-33-batman-arkham-knight-season-pass

Lots of content promised, but still... Feels a bit like they're trying to see what they can get away with.

I still have issues with the idea of season passes. Gaming world has shown me too often is dlc not worth buying, to trust paying before it comes out.

^ That's why its a good idea to see what your getting from it before purchasing the pass.

I don't mind DLC but I don't like the idea of a seasons pass. It basically takes away any risk the developer has when creating the content.

Before, when they used expansions, at least the developer had a reason to try to do good when the buyer is in charge.

With the seasons pass, if they get 75% ownership then would the developer try as hard as they used too? Personally, I don't think so because I rarely see quality content that is part of the seasons pass. It's even worst when they release a large amount of content that's not part of it. I find that the most bullshit out of all it.

Originally posted by Lek Kuen
I still have issues with the idea of season passes. Gaming world has shown me too often is dlc not worth buying, to trust paying before it comes out.

Agreed. I have no problem with DLC, or offering a "buy it all at a discount" offer.

What I don't like is when they want you to pay for it before seeing what will even be available.

Me personally, I'll probably buy it, but only once it's on sale on GMG or something, and only if it looks like it's worth the money.

I don't mind it after the fact. I paid 10$ for the season pass for Bioshock Infinite after a few years it was released. I got a deal.

I have problem before the game is even released for the reasons I stated above. A lot of seasons pass for games have been shit.