bluewaterrider
Senior Member
Originally posted by celeyhyga17
Wondy "uncuffed" really hasn't been all that impressive ...
I think this has been a device the writers were experimenting with.
Some things DO evolve over time, after all.
For instance, to use an example many people might be familiar with,
the Hulk, back in issue 181, debut of X-Men hero Wolverine,
lightly endured the slashing of Logan's claws, almost without notice.
They were something that seemed to annoy rather than truly hurt.
Fast forward 20 or 30 years.
Logan's claws now score heavily, even on Greg Pak's powerful "World War" Hulk.
Hulk's toughness in battle has been gradually recast from a startling sort of durability to one of damage soak and metahuman healing ability.
Randomly, though, as in the case now of "Indestructible" Hulk, the writers "revert" back to original ideas, or, as might be more proper to term it,
"update" the character with elements from the past.
We have a parallel case here.
Note that there was a long-standing theme in the Wonder Woman mythos, that, if Diana's bracelets were ever removed,
she would become like a berserker, unchained.
The fact was sometimes used as a last ditch recourse to salvage a situation from what would otherwise be an absolutely certain defeat.
That dates back all the way to the 1940s.
Compare to what we see now:
Diana's opponent is a god, a child's life is in danger, few if any innocent bystanders are around, the situation is must-win,
only physical power will decide ... Wondy's "gloves" come off.
It is as if the writers wanted to pay homage to the creators of yesteryear, Easter-Egg longtime fans,
and provide an answer to ol' Sundip kid's trump card.
Then too, they even update it by giving Diana, quite in contrast to the past, ability to control the power she expresses, even in that heightened state.
Personally, I'm rather happy with the overall handling, accidental or not.
There's a great deal I'm finding wrong with the Wonder Woman series, but,
so far, this "uncuff" motif isn't one of them.