Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them

Started by Robtard6 pages

Originally posted by quanchi112
Look at my sig. That was Tom Riddle saying, I am Lord Voldemort to Harry Potter.

🙂

Watch the films already, infidel.

Toddler Tom Riddle is not a the Dark lord 🙂

Only you would get excited about the slimmest chance of a toddler Tom Riddle showing up. You're an odd person.

Originally posted by Robtard
Toddler Tom Riddle is not a the Dark lord 🙂

Only you would get excited about the slimmest chance of a toddler Tom Riddle showing up. You're an odd person.

Its like you saying I am not the same person at age 34 as I was at age 1.

I never said I was excited. Pay attention. I said it is a possibility. That's all I said. You're not the brightest guy out there.

Tom Marvolo Riddle is Voldemort. 🙂

Originally posted by quanchi112
Its like you saying I am not the same person at age 34 as I was at age 1.

I never said I was excited. Pay attention. I said it is a possibility. That's all I said. You're not the brightest guy out there.

Tom Marvolo Riddle is Voldemort. 🙂

No, it's like saying we saw Darth Vader in ep1 when we saw little Anakin. That wold be wrong, as Anakin hadn't become Vader yet 🙂

Stop lying.

He becomes Voldemort; he isn't Voldemort when he's a toddler. Try and follow the mediocre franchise you claim to love above all others.

Originally posted by Robtard
No, it's like saying we saw Darth Vader in ep1 when we saw little Anakin. That wold be wrong, as Anakin hadn't become Vader yet 🙂

Stop lying.

He becomes Voldemort; he isn't Voldemort when he's a toddler. Try and follow the mediocre franchise you claim to love above all others.

We see a younger Riddle say he was Lord Voldemort. Point proven.

You are ignorant and thought differently.

I backed my point with on screen evidence whereas you keep making baseless claims.

😄

Originally posted by quanchi112
False. Therefore since Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows begins in the summer of 1997, Voldemort would have been 70 years old at the time! His death takes place at the end of that 7th book on May 2nd, 1998, meaning Voldemort died at the ripe old age of 71!!
🙂

So he wasn't born 70 years before the movies started... Thanks for proving my point.

Originally posted by quanchi112
We see a younger Riddle say he was Lord Voldemort. Point proven.

You are ignorant and thought differently.

I backed my point with on screen evidence whereas you keep making baseless claims.

😄

As a younger wizard, but not as a toddler. You failed again.

Stop lying.

Show me a toddler Tom Riddle claiming he's a Dark Lord.

Originally posted by ares834
So he wasn't born 70 years before the movies started... Thanks for proving my point.
The events of Harry Potter meaning their conclusion.

🙂

Next time think before taking me on.

Originally posted by Robtard
As a toddler? Nope.

Stop lying.

Show me a toddler Tom Riddle claiming he's a Dark Lord.

You said until he becomes Voldemort but we see a young Riddle already declare it prior to it happening thus proving my point.

🙂

Basically your logic means every single day you're a different person. Awful logic from an awful man.

Originally posted by quanchi112
The events of Harry Potter meaning their conclusion.

🙂

Next time think before taking me on.

The "events in Harry Potter" meaning the events in Harry Potter which includes The Philosopher's Stone.

Originally posted by ares834
The "events in Harry Potter" meaning the events in Harry Potter which includes The Philosopher's Stone.
No, the events mean their conclusion which wrapped it up.

🙂

Keep telling yourself that.

Originally posted by ares834
Keep telling yourself that.
see you're really confused. I am telling you that, silly.

Originally posted by quanchi112
False. Therefore since Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows begins in the summer of 1997, Voldemort would have been 70 years old at the time! His death takes place at the end of that 7th book on May 2nd, 1998, meaning Voldemort died at the ripe old age of 71!!
🙂

Claims author's opinions aren't valid in movie threads. Uses book info to "back his case" in a movie thread.

Classic quan.

Originally posted by quanchi112
see you're really confused. I am telling you that, silly.

Telling me lies? Thanks I guess... If they used the word "event" you may actually have a point. But they used "events" meaning what happened.

wonderfull i think its superb idea....

http://duiattorneyhelp.com/

Originally posted by Epicurus
Claims author's opinions aren't valid in movie threads. Uses book info to "back his case" in a movie thread.

Classic quan.

She is writing the screenplay and it hasn't been made into a movie yet. You are so simple it makes me giggle.

Originally posted by ares834
Telling me lies? Thanks I guess... If they used the word "event" you may actually have a point. But they used "events" meaning what happened.
Yes, and the last of the events is when it ends thus I was right. As always.

TROLL! [in the dungeons]. [There's a] TROLL [in the dungeons.]

Though you'd want to know.

Originally posted by quanchi112
She is writing the screenplay and it hasn't been made into a movie yet. You are so simple it makes me giggle.

I am talking about you citing Voldemort's based on what the books told us, mon ami.

You use book info to validate your claims in one movie thread and then do a 180 and dismiss author quotes in another movie thread. What an awful hypocrite. LOL.

Originally posted by Epicurus
I am talking about you citing Voldemort's based on what the books told us, mon ami.

You use book info to validate your claims in one movie thread and then do a 180 and dismiss author quotes in another movie thread. What an awful hypocrite. LOL.

I am citing her words regarding when this takes place. She is writing the screenplay. 😂

The circumstances are entirely different, old sport.

You are rather confused often and don't use critical thinking ever.