Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them

Started by Epicurus6 pages

Originally posted by quanchi112
I am citing her words regarding when this takes place. She is writing the screenplay. 😂

The circumstances are entirely different, old sport.

You are rather confused often and don't use critical thinking ever.


You are being a hypocrite as usual. Selectively choosing which of her claims apply to the movies. Lol, what an idiot.

Originally posted by Epicurus
You are being a hypocrite as usual. Selectively choosing which of her claims apply to the movies. Lol, what an idiot.
She is writing the screenplay here. The circumstances are different. Quit repeating yourself in chimpanzee fashion.

Originally posted by quanchi112
She is writing the screenplay here. The circumstances are different. Quit repeating yourself in chimpanzee fashion.

Only hypocrites dismiss author's claims in one thread and then parade book fact as being canon to movies in another thread.

Voldemort's age is relevant to the mainstream HP series as well. If you think her word applies simply because she is involved in this project which hasn't even completely kicked off yet, then there is no other choice but to accept her word on other matters which weren't explored in the movies as well. Such as DEs being incapable of casting patronuses.🙂

Originally posted by Epicurus
Only hypocrites dismiss author's claims in one thread and then parade book fact as being canon to movies in another thread.

Voldemort's age is relevant to the mainstream HP series as well. If you think her word applies simply because she is involved in this project which hasn't even completely kicked off yet, then there is no other choice but to accept her word on other matters which weren't explored in the movies as well. Such as DEs being incapable of casting patronuses.🙂

She is writing the screenplay. It is a different set of circumstances.

Her opinion in writing the screenplay is relevant here to when this story takes place.

😂

Originally posted by quanchi112
She is writing the screenplay. It is a different set of circumstances.

Her opinion in writing the screenplay is relevant here to when this story takes place.

😂


So her opinion counts for one movie but not the others. Got it. Great logic going there, hypocrisy112.

Originally posted by Epicurus
So her opinion counts for one movie but not the others. Got it. Great logic going there, hypocrisy112.
It counts prior to the movie having a director and due to the fact she wrote the screenplay.

😂

Differences, troll.

Originally posted by quanchi112
It counts prior to the movie having a director and due to the fact she wrote the screenplay.

😂

Differences, troll.


The movie is part of the same cinematic verse as the rest of the HP series. Which means that if her word counts for this one, it counts for all.

Basic logic is far beyond your skills, Mr Selective Bias.

Originally posted by Epicurus
The movie is part of the same cinematic verse as the rest of the HP series. Which means that if her word counts for this one, it counts for all.

Basic logic is far beyond your skills, Mr Selective Bias.

She is writing the screenplay thus making this an entirely different situation. Context.

Originally posted by quanchi112
She is writing the screenplay thus making this an entirely different situation. Context.

Is this movie set in a different universe from the mainstream Harry Potter cinematic verse? Answer this question with a simple yes or no.

Originally posted by Epicurus
Is this movie set in a different universe from the mainstream Harry Potter cinematic verse? Answer this question with a simple yes or no.
She is given considerably more power with this franchise than she was with the last one at the moment.

🙂

Originally posted by quanchi112
She is given considerably more power with this franchise than she was with the last one at the moment.

🙂


So you're basically saying that Fantastic Beasts is set in a different cinematic universe as opposed to the HP series. So you have any concrete proof for such an asinine assumption?

Originally posted by Epicurus
So you're basically saying that Fantastic Beasts is set in a different cinematic universe as opposed to the HP series. So you have any concrete proof for such an asinine assumption?
I never said that I said she has much more power and input now since she is writing the screenplay.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I never said that I said she has much more power and input now since she is writing the screenplay.

So even though these films are part of the same cinematic universe, her opinion should only apply to one series and not the other? What sort of crappy reasoning is that?

Originally posted by Epicurus
So even though these films are part of the same cinematic universe, her opinion should only apply to one series and not the other? What sort of crappy reasoning is that?
Her opinion matters here since she is writing the screenplay. How many times do I have to tell you, dummy ?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Her opinion matters here since she is writing the screenplay. How many times do I have to tell you, dummy ?

Even while ignoring that she was the adviser for the scripts of the rest of the HP franchise and the exec producer of the last 2 films? You are as hypocritical as they get, dork.

Originally posted by Epicurus
Even while ignoring that she was the adviser for the scripts of the rest of the HP franchise and the exec producer of the last 2 films? You are as hypocritical as they get, dork.
She didn't write the entire screenplay and once it commences who knows what will be changed by the director. Quit ignoring the different circumstances.

Originally posted by quanchi112
She didn't write the entire screenplay and once it commences who knows what will be changed by the director. Quit ignoring the different circumstances.

Basically speaking, you accept her opinion for one movie which is part of the cinematic verse which she actively had a hand in building, but dismiss for all the others. Hypocrisy can't get any more blatant than in your case.

Originally posted by Epicurus
Basically speaking, you accept her opinion for one movie which is part of the cinematic verse which she actively had a hand in building, but dismiss for all the others. Hypocrisy can't get any more blatant than in your case.
No, since the circumstances are different.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, since the circumstances are different.

Different like what?

Originally posted by Epicurus
Different like what?
Reread the thread if your brain can't keep up.