Riddle goes Biblical · Foreign Cinema

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Epicurus
😂

Concession accepted.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Bentley
Your hate for Thanos is strong.

Absurd. Try to stick to the topic, troll.

Riddle wins.

Bentley Seitei

Originally posted by quanchi112
Absurd. Try to stick to the topic, troll.
Riddle wins.

According to you, inmunity against Death is bypassed by AK. Lucifer has it, Thanos has it.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Bentley
According to you, inmunity against Death is bypassed by AK. Lucifer has it, Thanos has it.

Lucifer doesn't have it. Voldemort wins here.

Bentley Seitei

Originally posted by quanchi112
Lucifer doesn't have it. Voldemort wins here.

Do you know Lucifer? Riddle can't even tag him.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Bentley
Do you know Lucifer? Riddle can't even tag him.

Yes, I saw him. Unimpressive crybaby. Ak destroys him.

Epicurus True Killer

Originally posted by quanchi112
Concession accepted.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Irony.

BloodRain Knight of Retribution

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes, I saw him. Unimpressive crybaby. Ak destroys him.

Newborn baby > AK

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Epicurus

Concession accepted, sport.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by BloodRain
Newborn baby > AK

Quit ignoring the context of the feat. Thats a sign of a bad debater.

Bentley Seitei

Originally posted by quanchi112
Quit ignoring the context of the feat. Thats a sign of a bad debater.

That newborn baby had less magical resistance than Luci. Quit ignoring the context of this battle sport 😈

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Bentley
That newborn baby had less magical resistance than Luci. Quit ignoring the context of this battle sport 😈

Completely untrue. Ak kills Lucy.

Voldemort wins. The supernatural verse is extremely weak.

Epicurus True Killer

Originally posted by quanchi112
Concession accepted, sport.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Based on ?

BloodRain Knight of Retribution

Originally posted by quanchi112
Quit ignoring the context of the feat. Thats a sign of a bad debater.

Context?

When its stated that a "simple charm" is able to counter AK? When its shown in the movie that a common spell can deflect AK? When the spell has only been able to kill mortal humans at best?

Yeah, thats a nice gun there.

Bentley Seitei

Originally posted by quanchi112
Completely untrue. Ak kills Lucy.
Voldemort wins. The supernatural verse is extremely weak.

Voldemort is so weak he cannot beat the weaksauce universe that is the Hpverse .

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Epicurus

You conceded. Get over it.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by BloodRain
Context?
When its stated that a "simple charm" is able to counter AK? When its shown in the movie that a common spell can deflect AK? When the spell has only been able to kill mortal humans at best?
Yeah, thats a nice gun there.

You need to know it isn't simple at all.

The tools or magic of the VoldeVerse isn't available here for the Supernatural characters.

It has killed an immortal.

Epicurus True Killer

Originally posted by quanchi112
You conceded. Get over it.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You are lying to yourself.

Bentley Seitei

Originally posted by quanchi112
It has killed an immortal.

Thanos?

BloodRain Knight of Retribution

Originally posted by quanchi112
You need to know it isn't simple at all.
The tools or magic of the VoldeVerse isn't available here for the Supernatural characters.
It has killed an immortal.

You either mean Tom, who is only immortal in the way that he's split into bits, which means no single piece is immoral.

Or you mean Fawks, the immortal Phoenix that rebirths itself.. but wait.. wait AK didn't kill the bird now did it?

Well, I'm sure you know of an actual immortal AK has killed. Or anything that can't be wasted by a bullet.