Originally posted by ares834
He can only tank exatons if you don't have common sense and rely on horrendously flawed physics.I mean look at this shit:
😂
That's the big important part of the "calc" and it is laughably flawed. Heck, even someone with no understanding of physics could realize the error he made here if they thought about it for a bit.
Nah man, it's totally correct. (sarcasm)
I mean, you literally have to be a three year old to believe that shit.
Originally posted by SSJGGogeta Yes, grin because I'm right, and you're ridiculously wrong.
have fun going "no u" all day, all your shit really amounts to
Exactly, retard. That's the exact reason that pixel-scaling is completely unreliable, and stupid.
No, we pick and examine the scans where we can get the highest level of perceived accuracy. Nothing in fiction will be 100% consistent
It's as consistent as physics are with fictional feats. Can they ever be 100% accurate? Not really, however the can be good enough for fictional debates? Yeah pretty much
So how do you know what you can pixel scale off of, huh "sonny boy"? Exactly. You don't, because authors don't draw to scale.
See above
The same way everyone else does. Feats, statements, authors word, and author approved/written literature.
And you legitimately quantify those on screen feats, how, again?
Again, depends on who the statement is from (character statements have to be looked at with a grain of salt, DBZ and Bleach are good examples of this)
Even then, you can use said statements as a base and pixel scale everything else of that so, yeah
BTW, making your text bold through entire sentences and paragraphs makes you look retarded, so let's not do that again.
Baww
Most of your 'rebuttals' can just have the same thing said to them
Second off, can you be a bit more original, if you're going to flamebait, at least try to do something beyond "no u" retorts. Pwease?
Originally posted by StealthRanger
have fun going "no u" all day, all your shit really amounts toNo, we pick and examine the scans where we can get the highest level of perceived accuracy. Nothing in fiction will be 100% consistent
It's as consistent as physics are with fictional feats. Can they ever be 100% accurate? Not really, however the can be good enough for fictional debates? Yeah pretty much
See above
And you legitimately quantify those on screen feats, how, again?
Again, depends on who the statement is from (character statements have to be looked at with a grain of salt, DBZ and Bleach are good examples of this)
Even then, you can use said statements as a base and pixel scale everything else of that so, yeah
Baww
Most of your 'rebuttals' can just have the same thing said to them
Second off, can you be a bit more original, if you're going to flamebait, at least try to do something beyond "no u" retorts. Pwease?
How am I the one going "no u", when all you've done is specifically say that I was right? I don't even need to put in effort when debating with something who literally agrees with me, as well as disproves their own point in the same paragraph.
Again, pixel-scaling 99% of the time contrasts direct statements and demonstrated feats. Therefor, it is incorrect, because it goes against actual cannon.
By either the feats being plainly demonstrated, statements, or author approved literature. I've already explained this.
Yes, it does. As I just said. However, people who are legitimately gauging something, and not just being arrogant or too cocky ARE reliable sources, as they have no reason to say something incorrect, when authors use them in place of narrators for all kinds of manga.
Even then, 99% of pixel scaling defies cannon, so it's... What? Oh yeah, non cannon.
See above. 👆