Robtard vs Quanchi112

Originally posted by Arachnid1
Yep. You don't need to be built to be good looking. Just toned with a bit of muscle. Most girls prefer toned men to body builders. Its good to work out sometimes and have some muscle, but just until you get to a certain point. From there, just maintain (unless its something you love, in which case best of luck to you).

Originally posted by Firefly218
A lot of those meticulous fans of the original Star Trek dislike these reboots, like Lestov. They're a really small segment of the market so who gives a phuck.

Originally posted by NemeBro
Aesthetic is not the only reason to exercise. I do it to get stronger, whether or not anyone finds me more or less attractive for it is frankly irrelevant. Though I will note that a lot of women do find feats of strength alluring (I assume dadudemon can back me up on that statement).

YouTube video

IMO (from what I've seen/been told), women tend to care more how lifting weights makes a man look, than the actual amount of weight lifted.

Originally posted by Firefly218
Georg R.R. Martin is a wannabe Joss Whedon is what I'm saying 😄

He's also less of a ********** IRL.

Originally posted by Firefly218
A lot of those meticulous fans of the original Star Trek dislike these reboots, like Lestov. They're a really small segment of the market so who gives a phuck.

you were grossly and baselessly asserting the majority in order to marginalize someone's opinion.

now calmeth thine jimmies.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
you were grossly and baselessly asserting the majority in order to marginalize someone's opinion.

now calmeth thine jimmies.

Star Trek TV viewership topped at 11 million viewers. Adding fans from reruns, Netflix etc... approximately 15 to 16 million fans of the original Star trek show. Of those 16 million fans, maybe 50 percent are bitchy, nit pickey "meticulous" fans. So 8 million fans of the original Star Trek compared to approximately 30 million viewers of the reboot.

I would certainly say meticulous fans of the original are the minority in market share.

Apply your butthurt cream conservatively

Originally posted by Firefly218
maybe 50 percent are bitchy, nit pickey "meticulous" fans.

this part right here. this is the essence of why your schtick is lame.

.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
this part right here. this is the essence of why your schtick is lame.

Key word maybe.

Face it bro, meticulous Trek fans are in the minority. Which is why the consensus loved these reboots.

Or maybe not?

Originally posted by Firefly218
👆

They sent the masterpiece that was the original Start Trek. I still consider them good popcorn movies

I found them entertaining as well, but lacking of the substance that made the series so popular in the first place. I didn't hate them, or even think they were bad, but definitely not on par with the originals. I don't have a problem if anybody like the film, but when fools (like Simple Kenny) try to claim they're better than the originals, it really grinds my gears.

Lube is good from gears that are grinding.

How does one extract lube from gears?

Though I'm sure you already know, I believe he meant for. It's a metaphor. The new Star Treks are the lube for a rusty, aging franchise.

Originally posted by Lestov16
I found them entertaining as well, but lacking of the substance that made the series so popular in the first place. I didn't hate them, or even think they were bad, but definitely not on par with the originals. I don't have a problem if anybody like the film, but when fools (like Simple Kenny) try to claim they're better than the originals, it really grinds my gears.

Agreed.

JJ Abrams will hopefully to good for Star Wars

Originally posted by dadudemon
Well, I think I'm a broken record, at this point. I've said, now, for 2 years that the best way to handle Quanchi is not respond. Sure, that's the classic way to handle a troll but none of you can resist him.

Sometimes, I don't think any parties are trolling and you all genuinely are getting worked up over the topics.

If he makes a Versus on something I feel I must defend, because people will google these versus and read them, I need to make sure they take my view instead of his. After that is done I stop responding. If you notice I have stoped arguing in every LOZ thread aside from "argue with Quan about Zelda" Because that's just too fun and the highlight of my internet day.

I show people in my class and we laugh at him.

Originally posted by Firefly218
Agreed.

JJ Abrams will hopefully to good for Star Wars

I don't know man. I'm really scared about this new Star Wars movie. Just look at Into Darkness. I thought it was awesome and Khan was becoming scarier and scarier. But then Spock beat him in a two minute hand to hand and I had never been so disappointed in my life. It was just too simple. Abrams nailed everything else perfectly though...

Originally posted by Firefly218
Agreed.

JJ Abrams will hopefully to good for Star Wars

I think he will be perfect for Star Wars. Passionate emotions, nail biting suspense, and manipulative power plays are all things JJ's great at, and they're exactly what Star Wars needs.

I just hope it has the same intense, emotional dialogue the prequels had. For example:

"Only a Sith deals in absolutes."

"The Sith are evil!"
"From my point of view the Jedi are evil."

We can pray it does.

"Love won’t save you, Padme. Only my new powers can do that." <--- My fav

"I’m haunted by the kiss that you should never have given me."

"What if the democracy we thought we were serving no longer exists, and the Republic has become the very evil we have been fighting to destroy?"