Obi Wan Kenobi (Season 5) VS Season 5 Maul and Savage (Rematch)

Started by DARTH POWER2 pages

Kenobi pushing Grievous showed Kenobi was more powerful than him. So of course Maul pushing Kenobi favours Maul as an argument.

The whole Lars dual you refer to is not canon.

The brothers SLAUGHTERHOUSE

Originally posted by PTforthewin
so what? Force pushing and throwing Kenobi around isnt a big feet. Kenobi did the same type of force push on grievous in episode 3. Plus Maul was killed by Owen Lars and he lost to obi in that dual near the Lars homestead.

Grievous can't use the force. He has no telekinetic defense.

Also the fight you refer to on tatooine is noncanon.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Grievous can't use the force. He has no telekinetic defense.

Also the fight you refer to on tatooine is noncanon.

proof it give me a source

Originally posted by PTforthewin
proof it give me a source

Prove what? Grievous can't use the force or Old Wounds is noncanon?

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Prove what? Grievous can't use the force or Old Wounds is noncanon?
old wounds

Firstly is completely contradicted by TCW so would automatically be rendered Non-Canon.
Secondly, it was never canon in the first place, it was part of a "what if" line which had things like "what if Luke failed to blow the Death Star."
Thirdly even in that Non-Canon comic Maul had Kenobu first but decided to gloat, before Kenobi beat Maul. Not that it matters though as it's not canon.

Actually, Old Wounds was once canon until Leland Chee stated it was not.

Both brothers have made Kenobi their ***** with their force attacks. Kenobi isn't really that great of a swordsmen, half of his notable duels have all been done as the plot demands and are PIS. He could probably take 50/50 on Savage, but in a duel dependent on actual skill and not George Lucas's idiotic plot contrivances Maul would kill Kenobi with mid difficulty. Add both brothers and Kenobi is dead within a minute possibly less

Originally posted by Emperordmb
It was taking everything Obi-wan had to hold off Maul and Savage on Florrum, and he had two advantages. One was dual blades, which were clearly useful in fending off both adversaries. The other was the relatively cramped environment of the cave, which Kenobi could take advantage of with Sokan, Maul and Savage could attack him from fewer directions, they had less space to coordinate, and the relative lack of space was certainly a hindrance to a fighter of Savage's size and armament.

Without these advantages here Kenobi would fall.

It shouldn't even matter what small advantages Kenobi had. Its a 2 on one situation. If its that Kenobi vs machine legged Maul & Savage, then Kenobi again has a chance of winning. It's not as "obvious" as Darth Power says it is.

Originally posted by mnat801
It shouldn't even matter what small advantages Kenobi had. Its a 2 on one situation. If its that Kenobi vs machine legged Maul & Savage, then Kenobi again has a chance of winning. It's not as "obvious" as Darth Power says it is.

Yes it is. Their combined Force powers are way too much for him. Heck their individual Force powers are probably enough to take him out. They both have beastly TK, and Kenobi has never done well against powerful TK attacks.