Originally posted by NemeBrobecause we didn't actually see either of them create the universe. We can only use onscreen feats. If AlanisGod didn't actually do something onscreen, we can't say she beats a guy who turned another guy into a God.
So why would a bunch of considerably less impressive feats matter?
Originally posted by Dr Will Hatch
Wouldn't Bollywood win through sheer numbers? India produces the greatest number of movies per year, and a significant quorum of those are bound to have omnipotent god characters in them.
Originally posted by marwash22
MorganGod was the creator as well.dunno how i feel about the whole, "can't directly speak to people " thing... that could be interpreted as lack of control. heh.
MorganGod gave another person the power to literally move the moon.
If both are said to be basically the same character, but one has feats and the other doesn't, the one w/o feats loses, don't ya think?
For all intents and purposes they're the same being, just in a different package. Stands to reason if any character could exist simultaneously across all film universes it would be Abrahamic God.
But yes, if we separate them, Morgan has the better feats.