Kit Fisto vs. Kao Cen Darach

Kit defeating Grievous is better than Kao getting stomped by Malgus before he was even given the rank of Lord.

The events of The Cestus Deception and AOTC occur in 22 BBY. ROTS is 19 BBY. Am I missing something. No way Kenobi had come close to his ROTS level of Soresu mastery.

As far as Vindican being the equivalent of Maul; yea, just a hunch. But he deflected a missile, could produce Force lightning, and seemed just as adept with a saber staff as Maul.

He is not even close to Maul.

Fisto.

Bingo.

I'm positive this is Kit's best TK showing.

Originally posted by NewGuy01
Kit defeating Grievous is better than Kao getting stomped by Malgus before he was even given the rank of Lord.

Malgus, even at this point, is superior then Grievous. Even at this point, Malgus is among the greatest warriors of the Empire (which is tremendous reputation to uphold) and he achieves "zone" moment to overcome Darach.

Originally posted by Syndicate
2 Sith lords that in no way shape or form can compare to Sidious one being a featless Sith himself and the other being only an apprentice.

Vindican isn't exactly featless;

- Comes in to contact with a missile and tanks it, blunting its explosive power in the process with his mastery of the Force.
- Unleashes powerful bursts of Sith lightning.
- Demonstrates impressive endurance: continues to duel even after loosing an eye; survives a lightsaber impalement that would be fatal to most.

Vindican is a Sith Inquisitor and his understanding of the Force is expected to be above norm by virtue of this fact alone. He is a mentor of Malgus and successfully forges his apprentice in to a virtually unstoppable warrior.

Also, apprenticeship doesn't implies mookness or noobness. I have covered this part before.

REPEAT:

Malgus, even at this point, is superior then Grievous. Even at this point, Malgus is among the greatest warriors of the Empire (which is tremendous reputation to uphold) and he achieves "zone" moment to overcome Darach.

Originally posted by Syndicate
2 other blade masters die almost instantly to Sidious too and it's likely Darach would have fallen even faster.

Originally posted by Syndicate
Along with that Fisto's considerable feats as a duelist like beating Grievous and beating Obi Wan in the Cestus Deception far outweigh being beat by a featless Sith master and a Sith apprentice along with the superior TK showings from the OP clone wars series which I'll admit IS OP but still canon he takes this 7-8/10.

Also, Fisto's feats aren't superior to that of Darach.

Darach send a Sith Inquisitor packing with a blast of power. Have Fisto ever dominated a decent Force-user in this manner with his powers? NEVER

In addition, Darach lifted a heavy starship engine and hurled it like a missile towards Malgus. Have Fisto ever matches this feat with his TK abilities? NEVER

Fisto does have higher number of feats by virtue of being explored more then Darach but he falls short in comparative basis.

Originally posted by Syndicate
He is not even close to Maul.

Originally posted by Intrepid37
I'm positive this is Kit's best TK showing.

However, Darach lifted a heavy starship engine and hurled it like a missile towards an opponent without even a hand gesture, clearly a much superior feat in comparison.

Darach lifts this starship engine without even looking at it and hurls it like a missile towards Malgus without a hand gesture:

That engine size and that tank look pretty equal to me

Originally posted by carthage
That engine size and that tank look pretty equal to me

but it's thrown, rather than simply moved.

Lol. Fisto levitates the tank and rolls it. Darach's feat was clearly superior.

That starship engine also would be heavier then that water tank.

That substance isn't water, but the fact that Darach threw it makes the difference.

Kit still has better feats as a swordsman, though.

Originally posted by Nephthys
He's the Jedi Battlemaster. I am pretty sure he's an expert duelist. 😬

Also he performed good Force feats in the trailer.

Yeah so was Cin Drallig and we don't automatically assume he's above Fisto.

Read what I said after that. Drallig wasn't powerful enough to stand next to the greats, but he was still a master of all seven lightsaber forms. Someone being the Jedi Battlemaster is proof of extremely high levels of technical skill IMO.

I'm done debating. Fisto is clearly the better duelist and an apprentice Malgus isn't even close to Grievous. The idiotic sentences in this thread make me want to scream. He also has comparable TK feats which is why I say Fisto. I'm done with this thread you can all continue to debate among yourselves.

Originally posted by Nephthys
Read what I said after that. Drallig wasn't powerful enough to stand next to the greats, but he was still a master of all seven lightsaber forms. Someone being the Jedi Battlemaster is proof of extremely high levels of technical skill IMO.

No one is denying Kao's technical skill. His duel wielding of a saberstaff and a regular saber was really damned impressive. But that doesn't mean he has better raw power and speed than Kit.

Yep.

Originally posted by NewGuy01
Kit still has better feats as a swordsman, though.

Such as? We've already been over Kenobi and Grievous? If I recall, hasn't he had a low showing against Ventress?

Originally posted by Lord Stark
No one is denying Kao's technical skill. His duel wielding of a saberstaff and a regular saber was really damned impressive. But that doesn't mean he has better raw power and speed than Kit.

I didn't say that it did. All I've been suggesting is that he's a gifted swordsman with expert technical skill. Which is obviously the case.

And I would say that Kao seems to have better power than Kit, judging from the Force feats.

Kit stomps due to Kao not existing.