Out of Africa theory debunked?

http://atlanteangardens.blogspot.com/2014/05/out-of-africa-theory-officially-debunked.html

Ran into this on facebook. Wanted to know what everyone else's take on this is.

That source looks suspect.

That's rather interesting but all it does is move the goal posts.

Now we just have to go further back to find when all of those hominid species started popping up. Is that not extremely obvious???????

More power to this man and his team, if their goal is to figure out our genetic code. Less power to the knuckle dragging morons that maybe fund his research and look at the possible implications of the result to put others down. Hopefully he is an honest guy looking for answers. Likely, whoever is funding his research has an agenda. How it works folks.

Originally posted by meep-meep
Likely, whoever is funding his research has an agenda.

What is crucial about the haplogroups that are the subject of the article? One would think that, through the process of genetic drift, non-africans could inherit some genes that are non-african in origin, so what makes these particular genes special?

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
That source looks suspect.

My thought exactly.

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
That source looks suspect.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
My thought exactly.

http://file.scirp.org/Html/19566.html

I can't decipher all that sciencey nerd mumbo jumbo. What's the synopsis?

Originally posted by Astner
Stop poisoning this thread with your stupidity.

http://file.scirp.org/Html/19566.html

I meant some dude's blog with:

Labels: Aryan, Atlantis, clovis, cro magnon, Fallen Angels, giants, Neanderthal, solutrean, Titans

Usually the usage of 'Aryan' instead of 'Indo-European' denotes an agenda. I'm not saying the premise is invalid; I'm simply saying the source should be treated as suspect until validity is conclusively proven because of possible confirmation bias.

Originally posted by Astner
Stop poisoning this thread with your stupidity.

I've looked at other publications and haven't seen anything about, yet.

Do you have other sources?

Also, telling someone who is skeptical that their opinion is poison and stupid does not reflect well on you or your thread.

Perhaps this "new idea" cannot withstand scrutiny.

Originally posted by Astner
Stop poisoning this thread with your stupidity.

http://file.scirp.org/Html/19566.html

While your link is relevant, it's not stupidity to be skeptical of an unconfirmed source. In fact it's the opposite.

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
I meant some dude's blog with:

Usually the usage of 'Aryan' instead of 'Indo-European' denotes an agenda. I'm not saying the premise is invalid; I'm simply saying the source should be treated as suspect until validity is conclusively proven because of possible confirmation bias.

"Russian Geneticist Disprove" There's issue number one and it's just the headliner.

The shot of Raquel Welch in 'One Million Years B.C.' is nice though.

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
I meant some dude's blog with:

Usually the usage of 'Aryan' instead of 'Indo-European' denotes an agenda. I'm not saying the premise is invalid; I'm simply saying the source should be treated as suspect until validity is conclusively proven because of possible confirmation bias.

Go easy on Astner, he's a Swede and doesn't understand stuff.

Originally posted by Robtard
"Russian Geneticist Disprove" There's issue number one and it's just the headliner.

The shot of Raquel Welch in 'One Million Years B.C.' is nice though.

She was pretty hot back in the day.

Originally posted by Robtard
Go easy on Astner, he's a Swede and doesn't understand stuff.

He's so white he bleeds milk. This paper reaffirms his superiority complex and makes living with his micropenis and boyish body that much easier.

Originally posted by SamZED
Must be uncle Russian again.

Originally posted by Badabing
FTFY 131

In Soviet Russia, you eat zombie.

^
[/B][/QUOTE]
Nah. In Soviet Russia, pussy eat you.