Galen Marek vs. Darth Nox

Started by Zenwolf10 pages

Originally posted by FreshestSlice
Marek might beat Nox, but Nox is female, damn it.

Nope. The Ghosts aren't "defense stuff." They augment Nox's already pretty high Force reserves with large amounts of energy, mostly to make up for them being at a disadvantage not being trained as much as most higher up Sith. Anything dealing with defense is something Nox still brings up on his/her own.

Yet it seems to me all that is unquaitifable, so spouting out how powerful Nox is, is rather pointless rather than just...ya know going off what Nox is capable of.

Unless of course were allowing unqauntifiable things for characters now.

Doesn't matter. Nox says it's "raw power." And I believe them.

Nox can backhand lightning. It's "near-impossible" to deflect lightning.

I think Nox has the skill to back up her defense on top of the power, personally.

How does that answer, "What do the ghosts do?"

Starkiller kills the ghosts

Which marek is this? Either one takes it, but Tfu2 'killer may very well stomp.

<--------------- is questioning if you think 'killer actually stomps or this is just an elaborate plot

'killer blew a star destroyer apart and withstood atmospheric reentry while Tk'ing a frigate before blowing it the fvck up.

Nox's light show ain't touching that.

Force pushing an injured guard in SWTOR = Dorsk 81 in TFU

mmm

welp, you got me there.

Tbf force pushing is out of Nox's range of capabilities

Spoiler:
this is why debating in this vein is flawed no matter what. Different interpretations of character power are different interpretations of character power.

wat?

Spoiler:
feats are just as incomparable as accolades, especially cross-era.

Not really. feats are pretty easy to compare for the most part. Blowing apart a star destroyer {'killer} is orders of magnitude more impressive than force pushing a random trooper into a computer console {bandon}.

Now whether those feats reliably portray superiority is another matter, but determining superiority of the feats themselves is a pretty easy thing to do in most cases imo.

Originally posted by The_Tempest
Now whether those feats reliably portray superiority is another matter, but determining superiority of the feats themselves is a pretty easy thing to do in most cases imo.

Except when you have things like KOTOR 2, TFU, and even OCW. Will 'Killer and Vader stomp Windu, Exar Kun, Revan, etc as well?

Originally posted by XSUPREMEXSKILLZ
Except when you have things like KOTOR 2, TFU, and even OCW. Will 'Killer and Vader stomp Windu, Exar Kun, Revan, etc as well?

Which is why I said "now whether those feats reliably portray superiority is another matter," which you ignored in your rush to contradict me.

But the debate so far has only considered feats. so I thought I'd be helpful by pointing out that 'killer's feats vastly outstrip Nox's.

Now bend the knee, servant.

I noticed it, which is why I quoted it. That's another matter though, is it not?

You've already hustled this elaborate plan, tbh.

And nah take NewGuy instead.

No Temp, AP made points about Nox's sorcery being something Marek has no experience against and much of the talk has been about the logical impact of Nox's ghosts, not just feats.

Originally posted by Nephthys
No Temp, AP made points about Nox's sorcery being something Marek has no experience against

feats.

Originally posted by Nephthys
and much of the talk has been about the logical impact of Nox's ghosts, not just feats.

Extrapolation from feats.

Lolno