Originally posted by h1a8stfu coming coming from you.
Nice attempt at lowballing.
Several things
1. This is classic Juggs (the one from the old days, the one with the forcefield)
2. What if Onslaught physical strength >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>anything Juggs faced. Why can't that be possible?
Still the same Juggs, prove other wise.
No feats to prove other wise , so again stfu
Originally posted by Insane Titan
stfu coming coming from you.Still the same Juggs, prove other wise.
No feats to prove other wise , so again stfu
If a character has one feat of strength. Then that's his strength.
Everyone and they momma knows that Juggs is way more durable than Galactus.
Thor nor Bill is cracking Juggs with Mjolnir.
Thor is not affecting Juggs with a Godblast.
I like how we compare Galactus' durability when he's weakened to Juggernaut's highest showings.
And we use Beta only damaging Galactus' helmet as a means to prove his durability. Should we use examples where Juggernaut's armor is damaged as well? I really doubt team Juggernaut would want that.
And last but not least, the Godblast is far and away Juggernaut's best durability feat and it goes against almost every other durability feat he has. Not to mention a non weakened Galactus tanked an amped Godblast anyway. Not a Godblast from a Thor who would pass out and become severely weakened during the time.
Originally posted by Branlor Swift
I like how we compare Galactus' durability when he's weakened to Juggernaut's highest showings.And we use Beta only damaging Galactus' helmet as a means to prove his durability. Should we use examples where Juggernaut's armor is damaged as well? I really doubt team Juggernaut would want that.
And last but not least, the Godblast is far and away Juggernaut's best durability feat and it goes against almost every other durability feat he has. Not to mention a non weakened Galactus tanked an amped Godblast anyway. Not a Godblast from a Thor who would pass out and become severely weakened during the time.
How can the godblast go against another durability feat? That's like saying Superman lifting a tank with ease goes against him lifting a car with ease.
Thor phucked Galactus up though. Galactus has never been portrayed as indestructible though. He's been affected by almost everything (Thanos blasts, Thor's hammer, etc.). Juggs has been portrayed as indestructible countless times.
I don't see Thor bothering Juggs ever with Mjolnir.
Originally posted by h1a8
How can the godblast go against another durability feat? That's like saying Superman lifting a tank with ease goes against him lifting a car with ease.Thor phucked Galactus up though. Galactus has never been portrayed as indestructible though. He's been affected by almost everything (Thanos blasts, Thor's hammer, etc.). Juggs has been portrayed as indestructible countless times.
I don't see Thor bothering Juggs ever with Mjolnir.
Originally posted by dynamixWe go by feats. Not by what we think should be the case. Galactus has been affected far too many times. Juggs has appeared invincible far too many times.
let see...an avatar of some Elder God vs a high level cosmic entity...this is certainly a toughie. but u know what, the fact that this thread was made shows how silly marvel is sometimes lol.
This is Juggs with the forcefield though.
Originally posted by eaebiakuyaWW stop his moving, he didn't penetrate his durability.
Juggernaut can tank Celestials attacks ? I dont believe, because War Hulk with celestial tech was able to affect him.Galactus tanked Celestials attacks.
WW is not applicable to Celestials at all. Celestials blast with energy beams. Energy beams and stopping Juggs from moving are two different things.
Originally posted by h1a8
WW stop his moving, he didn't penetrate his durability.WW is not applicable to Celestials at all. Celestials blast with energy beams. Energy beams and stopping Juggs from moving are two different things.
You don't have the first clue as to what you're talking about here, BitchSonFakeShate.
Originally posted by DarkRaidenThe funny thing is that Galactus has probably used shields on panel more often than Juggernaut, but Juggernaut needs the shield to even be perceived as invincible.
Juggs. Galactus is more vulnerable than Juggs until he puts up his shields. Also that godblast comparison doesn't bode well for Galactus.
And Galactus tanked a stronger Godblast than Juggernaut took anyway, without shields. I wonder if we should take a look at how Juggernaut took Thor's attacks without shields...
Also Onslaught. Twice
Originally posted by Branlor Swift
The funny thing is that Galactus has probably used shields on panel more often than Juggernaut, but Juggernaut needs the shield to even be perceived as invincible.And Galactus tanked a stronger Godblast than Juggernaut took anyway, without shields. I wonder if we should take a look at how Juggernaut took Thor's attacks without shields...
Also Onslaught. Twice
What does "Tank" mean? That GB sent Galactus running.
There is a huge difference between barely feeling anything and getting phucked up by something. There is an astronomical difference. I'm pretty sure that Thor's GB against Big G wasn't astronomically more than the one against Juggs.