The Sith Emperor vs. Satele Shan, Cade Skywalker, and TPM Maul

Started by Nephthys3 pages

Except his visions were accurate. There was no clouding involved, he saw with a burst of clarity. The Force showed him the way.

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
Congrats? That changes nothing.

Is there a legitimate reason for me to use the term "conceded" when you just quit and ignore the points at hand when you lose? 🙄

As I understand it, Sith have visions of possibilities, just like everyone else, that only they make absolute fact. He saw the HoT defeating Vitiate, so Scourge made it happen.

The burst of clarity showing Tython beating Vitiate does not necessarily mean Revan and his team cannot. Yes he saw them defeated, for, showing that if it was a burst of clarity, it would have been the canonical fate according to you, so he could have ultimately been seeing himself betraying Revan. If his vision showed Vitiate striking down Revan, it could have all we known been like the novel, and Revan is distracted by Scourge killing Meetra. We will never know.

Originally posted by XSUPREMEXSKILLZ
Is there a legitimate reason for me to use the term "conceded" when you just quit and ignore the points at hand when you lose? 🙄

Basically just as you have done to me now? You can see my logic now. 😉

It would have been just as you've done, but I responded to what you said and stated that your point was correct. Which is what the "yeah" at the beginning means, obviously.

This is a silly argument.
However the "yeah" means you agreed with me the entire time, yet you didn't.

Yes, yes it is.
the "yeah" followed by the "I just reread that part of the novel" means that I accept your point after reading that part again.

You put in the later point after I called you out on it. Nice try.

Aaaaaanyway. Back on topic, Vitiate defeats this team. Cade's shield won't hold, Maul gets ragdolled or BBQ'd and Satele takes it like her ancestor did.

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
You put in the later point after I called you out on it. Nice try.

When? Because no, I haven't added anything to my previous posts.

Unless you're speaking of me admitting that scourges point came before revan's, I'm which case yes I did.

Don't lie.

Your original response on the first part was just "Yeah" nothing with rereading it.
You changed it several seconds afterwards.

I'm not lying though. I'm fairly certain that I'd put the latter part of the sentence there already, and if not then I'd meant to.

You did not. If you did, it was after I clicked on your post and to late.
Regardless, this argument is stupid.

Ok, so while I was posting, your reply wasn't even created, it was nephs post about scourge. So I said, "yeah as neph said I'd take scourges word over revan's." After I posted that, your post came up and edited my post in response to that. End of story.

You quoted my post, then said "Yeah". it was not directed to neph.

Them I must've messed up and edited that part to clarify my statement.

Okay.

Anyways, another thing we must consider is that vitiate of SWTOR is more powerful than vitiate as of Revan.