Which one is more durable: true adamantium vs high heralds

Which one is more durable:

Adamantium vs Superman Pre Reboot

Adamantium vs Thor

Adamantium vs Destroyer

Adamantium vs Thanos

Destroyer > true adamantium

All of the rest are not particularly close at all

Originally posted by burrrrrr
Destroyer > true adamantium

All of the rest are not particularly close at all

wait till abhi gets here. 😂

Originally posted by 8swords
wait till abhi gets here. 😂

It doesn't matter. On average Superman would be cut by a weapon forged of adamantium, based on being cut by less.

The Destroyer and Thanos are not Heralds. The Destroyer is the only thing mentioned here to be composed of a substance that is superior to adamantium.

Lol at Thanos and the Destroyer being Herald level.

IMO any herald can be cut by an adamantium weapon, but IIRC that one time Magneto almost tossed Wolverine into the sun, he seemed to think that his Adamantium wouldn't be able to take that. Any high herald worth their salt has withstood a star before, pretty speculative, but that's all I got.

I'd just wager Wolverine is dumb.

Originally posted by pym-ftw
I'd just wager Wolverine is dumb.

oohhhhhhhh.... oh no you didnt.

Could be. I don't care enough to argue it either way.

I think it's just different properties. You can have a heat/fire resistant material like kevlar that is capable of being cut by scissors and fashioned into garments. It's not necessarily counterintuitive. Metals get forged in heat so it stands to reason that adamantium liquifies at a set boiling point. It doesn't mean that when it's forged into a blade it can't cut a material which wouldn't be damaged if it were exposed to adamantium's boiling point heat.

Originally posted by MF DELPH
I think it's just different properties. You can have a heat/fire resistant material like kevlar that is capable of being cut by scissors and fashioned into garments. It's not necessarily counterintuitive. Metals get forged in heat so it stands to reason that adamantium liquifies at a set boiling point. It doesn't mean that when it's forged into a blade it can't cut a material which wouldn't be damaged if it were exposed to adamantium's boiling point heat.

Guys dont stick to the title. I know Thanos and Destroyer are no heralds...i just tought in include then after i put the title and i forgot to change... 😮

Originally posted by Stoic
It doesn't matter. On average Superman would be cut by a weapon forged of adamantium, based on being cut by less.

Like what? I don't remember seeing him being cut, unless there are extenuating circumstances

There was Brainiac's ship, this Equus guy... and I don't remember anything else, aside from magic blades.

Equus had wing bones from an angel embedded in his arms, IIRC.

<.<

>.>

Let's go!!

Mwhahaha

Originally posted by Khazra Reborn
(...) he seemed to think that his Adamantium wouldn't be able to take that.

Not that. If Logan's skeleton had actually reached the sun and stayed there, there wouldn't have been no healing.

Superman is explicitly superior to adamantium in energy durability. Magic cutting weapons disrupt his invulnerability, adamantium cannot.

Didn't DD cut Superman? I think a class 100 with an Adamantium dagger could do the same.

Originally posted by Stoic
It doesn't matter. On average Superman would be cut by a weapon forged of adamantium, based on being cut by less.