KT
KuRuPT Thanosi
Senior Member
Re: Re: ANOTHER MOS question
Originally posted by Time Immemorial
This whole statement contradicts its self..Movie watching fail..
If Zod was stronger he would not have gotten his neck snapped with ease.
Common sense and logic failure... In this your first time watching a movie with big clownshoes on? You do know that generally and 99% of the time the hero ALWAYS wins and saves the day. That is what happens. So superman winning doesn't mean he was stronger or more powerful by any means. We see this all the time in comics as well. Maybe you should check out more movies and you'll realize somebody winning or losing doesn't mean it was PIS or CIS or that they were more powerful
JBJ
jinXed by JaNx
Senior Member
Re: Re: ANOTHER MOS question
Originally posted by Time Immemorial
If Zod was stronger he would not have gotten his neck snapped with ease.
I don't have an investment in the argument but you don't have to be stronger than someone or even very strong at all to break some ones neck. I've never personally broken some ones neck but I know it only takes seven pounds of the right leverage of pressure to snap the femur bone. The neck is much less durable and has far less muscle protecting it.
With all of that said I still think Superman is stronger, definitely not as skilled but stronger. He certainly has the most impressive strength feats in the movie.
Superman withstood the world engine and Zod couldn't escape Supermans grasp. I don't see Zod having any trouble snapping Supermans neck if he got the upper hand though