Poll
50%
50%
Originally posted by Firefly218
The deathstar can be better harnessed and manipulated as a weapon than black holes can. Black holes are unpredictable and hard to weaponize. Also, both black holes and the deathstar have planet busting capability. It's just that the deathstar is the better and easier to use weapon offensively
I agree with this and the Death Star is a mobile battle station on top of its planet busting ability.
Originally posted by Firefly218
The deathstar can be better harnessed and manipulated as a weapon than black holes can. Black holes are unpredictable and hard to weaponize. Also, both black holes and the deathstar have planet busting capability. It's just that the deathstar is the better and easier to use weapon offensively
Red Matter can be easily weaponized. What happen to the Death Star if a small fast ship (or even a cloaked one) deployed some right in its vicinity.
Originally posted by Robtard
Red Matter can be easily weaponized. What happen to the Death Star if a small fast ship (or even a cloaked one) deployed some right in its vicinity.
or just allowed themselves to be taken by tractor beam. the empire is quite stupid. for example, the whole story would have come to an abrupt end if they didn't:
Soldier 2: Hold your fire, there's no lifeforms aboard.
Terry: Hold your fire? What, are we paying by the laser now?
Soldier 2: You don't do the budget Terry, I do
Originally posted by Robtard
Red Matter can be easily weaponized. What happen to the Death Star if a small fast ship (or even a cloaked one) deployed some right in its vicinity.
Originally posted by Firefly218
The deathstar can be better harnessed and manipulated as a weapon than black holes can.
Originally posted by Firefly218
The ship would definitely be destroyed in the processUsing red matter would be like Indiana Jones using a nuclear bomb to blow open a vault.
Are you saying the Death Star would definitely destroy the ship before it could deploy the Red Matter?
The Death Star is a pretty big vault. So a Red Matter attack is sensible.
Originally posted by Firefly218Are you sure about this ?
The deathstar can be better harnessed and manipulated as a weapon than black holes can. Black holes are unpredictable and hard to weaponize. Also, both black holes and the deathstar have planet busting capability. It's just that the deathstar is the better and easier to use weapon offensively
Originally posted by Robtard
Are you saying the Death Star would definitely destroy the ship before it could deploy the Red Matter?The Death Star is a pretty big vault. So a Red Matter attack is sensible.
No, the red matter would destroy the ship along with the deathstar. Because red matter is an unpredictable and uncontrollable.
Originally posted by Firefly218
No, the red matter would destroy the ship along with the deathstar. Because red matter is an unpredictable and uncontrollable.
Star Trek ships have crazy shields that can withstand a black hole though as seen. The small ship could also jump to warp and GTFO in time.
Red Matter is fairly controllable and predictable. An amount is released from its container and a black hole is created there for a length of time. Not the safest weapon, granted. But it's not as wild and craxy as you seem to think.
Originally posted by RobtardCraxy ? Rage typo.
Star Trek ships have crazy shields that can withstand a black hole though as seen. The small ship could also jump to warp and GTFO in time.Red Matter is fairly controllable and predictable. An amount is released from its container and a black hole is created there for a length of time. Not the safest weapon, granted. But it's not as wild and craxy as you seem to think.