Star Trek vs. Star Wars

Started by quanchi11234 pagesPoll

Which universe is superior ?

Star Trek vs. Star Wars

Movies only. Both universes for Star Trek count. Which universe is superior in terms of intelligence, power, and weaponry.

Red matter FTW

Intelligence, Power and weaponry all go to Star Trek.

Awesomeness goes to Star Wars

Edit: Actually, if we're only counting movies, Star Wars wins Power and Weaponry

Originally posted by Firefly218
Intelligence, Power and weaponry all go to Star Trek.

Awesomeness goes to Star Wars

Edit: Actually, if we're only counting movies, Star Wars wins Power and Weaponry

Based on ?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Based on ?

The deathstar, in terms of destructive capability, is stronger than any weapon in the Star Trek movies thus far.

And the awesomeness part is just my opinion

Originally posted by Firefly218
The deathstar, in terms of destructive capability, is stronger than any weapon in the Star Trek movies thus far.

And the awesomeness part is just my opinion

How is stronger than red matter ?

The Genesis device is the most powerful weapon shown from either film series. The Death Star/Red Matter destroyed a planet, Genesis destroyed a whole nebula.

The deathstar can be better harnessed and manipulated as a weapon than black holes can. Black holes are unpredictable and hard to weaponize. Also, both black holes and the deathstar have planet busting capability. It's just that the deathstar is the better and easier to use weapon offensively

Originally posted by playa1258
The Genesis device is the most powerful weapon shown from either film series. The Death Star/Red Matter destroyed a planet, Genesis destroyed a whole nebula.

This is nu Trek we're talking about. Otherwise I would agree

Originally posted by Firefly218
The deathstar can be better harnessed and manipulated as a weapon than black holes can. Black holes are unpredictable and hard to weaponize. Also, both black holes and the deathstar have planet busting capability. It's just that the deathstar is the better and easier to use weapon offensively

I agree with this and the Death Star is a mobile battle station on top of its planet busting ability.

Originally posted by Firefly218
The deathstar can be better harnessed and manipulated as a weapon than black holes can. Black holes are unpredictable and hard to weaponize. Also, both black holes and the deathstar have planet busting capability. It's just that the deathstar is the better and easier to use weapon offensively

Red Matter can be easily weaponized. What happen to the Death Star if a small fast ship (or even a cloaked one) deployed some right in its vicinity.

Star Trek is scary with the tech they have. They just don't use it very good a lot the time.

Originally posted by Robtard
Red Matter can be easily weaponized. What happen to the Death Star if a small fast ship (or even a cloaked one) deployed some right in its vicinity.

or just allowed themselves to be taken by tractor beam. the empire is quite stupid. for example, the whole story would have come to an abrupt end if they didn't:

Soldier 2: Hold your fire, there's no lifeforms aboard.
Terry: Hold your fire? What, are we paying by the laser now?
Soldier 2: You don't do the budget Terry, I do

Originally posted by Robtard
Red Matter can be easily weaponized. What happen to the Death Star if a small fast ship (or even a cloaked one) deployed some right in its vicinity.

The ship would definitely be destroyed in the process
Originally posted by Firefly218
The deathstar can be better harnessed and manipulated as a weapon than black holes can.

Using red matter would be like Indiana Jones using a nuclear bomb to blow open a vault.

Originally posted by Firefly218
The ship would definitely be destroyed in the process

Using red matter would be like Indiana Jones using a nuclear bomb to blow open a vault.

Are you saying the Death Star would definitely destroy the ship before it could deploy the Red Matter?

The Death Star is a pretty big vault. So a Red Matter attack is sensible.

Originally posted by Firefly218
The deathstar can be better harnessed and manipulated as a weapon than black holes can. Black holes are unpredictable and hard to weaponize. Also, both black holes and the deathstar have planet busting capability. It's just that the deathstar is the better and easier to use weapon offensively
Are you sure about this ?

Originally posted by Robtard
Are you saying the Death Star would definitely destroy the ship before it could deploy the Red Matter?

The Death Star is a pretty big vault. So a Red Matter attack is sensible.

No, the red matter would destroy the ship along with the deathstar. Because red matter is an unpredictable and uncontrollable.

Originally posted by Firefly218
No, the red matter would destroy the ship along with the deathstar. Because red matter is an unpredictable and uncontrollable.

Star Trek ships have crazy shields that can withstand a black hole though as seen. The small ship could also jump to warp and GTFO in time.

Red Matter is fairly controllable and predictable. An amount is released from its container and a black hole is created there for a length of time. Not the safest weapon, granted. But it's not as wild and craxy as you seem to think.

Originally posted by Robtard
Star Trek ships have crazy shields that can withstand a black hole though as seen. The small ship could also jump to warp and GTFO in time.

Red Matter is fairly controllable and predictable. An amount is released from its container and a black hole is created there for a length of time. Not the safest weapon, granted. But it's not as wild and craxy as you seem to think.

Craxy ? Rage typo.

Star Trek simply because of the Q Continuum. They would wipe out anyone and anything from Star Wars.