Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Not really, I created a thread about muslim extremists and everyone started talking about christianity.
Oh well. That is a problem when the vast majority here have more to do with Christianity.
Some like me may sometimes speak to the whole of the Abrahamic cults depending on the issue at hand.
Bend my man that way you will not break.
Regards
DL
Originally posted by Greatest I am
Who goes to hell? The act or the person?
of course, the person... my point is, it's not wrong to be a gay if you're not doing homosexual acts... i have some friends in our church who are openly gay, i.e. they are attracted to same sex, talks like a girl, moves like a girl... but he never dresses like a girl, does not engage in homosexual relationship and continues his service to God...
as to women, i never see the Bible degrade women... by saying women are "weaker vessel" does not equate to "weaker sex" (not as the term we use today like degrading women)... women are weaker so men who are stronger will respect, understand and honor them:
"Husbands, likewise, dwell with them with understanding, giving honor to the wife, as to the weaker vessel, and as being heirs together of the grace of life, that your prayers may not be hindered."
I Peter 3:7
Originally posted by Greatest I am
Oh well. That is a problem when the vast majority here have more to do with Christianity.Some like me may sometimes speak to the whole of the Abrahamic cults depending on the issue at hand.
Bend my man that way you will not break.
Regards
DL
Not really though, people who are anti-christian will hate christianity over any other religion there is. Hence why the flipped out of me talking about Islam even though none of them are Islamic, its liberal brainwashing as they all drones. Especially Robtarded and Bardock.
Originally posted by Breno
You need to go back to bible school. Shouldn't be quoting scriptures unless you understand their context. You could make a fool of yourself and miss enform the needy. Shocking!
not unless you have your own pre-conceived interpretation with the verse, i don't see nothing wrong... and i don't think someone who writes wrong spelled words telling me to go back to Bible school... 🙂
1 spelling mistake doesn't change the facts. You have clearly suffered from the effects of a poor education. In addition to feeling the need to point out someone's spelling mistake (showing poor social skills) you have also demonstrated that you have a derisory understanding of English grammar. Infact, your written english is like that of a foreigner. I would hazard a guess and say that if you had ever tried to read the bible you didn't understand much of what you read
Originally posted by Breno
1 spelling mistake doesn't change the facts. You have clearly suffered from the effects of a poor education. In addition to feeling the need to point out someone's spelling mistake (showing poor social skills) you have also demonstrated that you have a derisory understanding of English grammar. Infact, your written english is like that of a foreigner. I would hazard a guess and say that if you had ever tried to read the bible you didn't understand much of what you read
When someon can't arrgue the point, thay becom the gramer polic.
this comment ---
Originally posted by Breno
You need to go back to bible school.
is from someone telling me that i have poor social skills... 😆
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
When someon can't arrgue the point, thay becom the gramer polic.
what point? him telling me not to quote the Scriptures unless i understand the context? i did not see any refute...
and this ---
Originally posted by Breno
Infact, your written english is like that of a foreigner. I would hazard a guess and say that if you had ever tried to read the bible you didn't understand much of what you read
is a very racist comment... very discriminatory... i don't know why your "buddha" approved it... 🙄
Originally posted by dyajeep
...what point? him telling me not to quote the Scriptures unless i understand the context? i did not see any refute...
It was a general statement about how people argue. It had nothing to do with the argument at hand.
I had just replied to "Greatest I am (not)" about the same thing. I found it interesting that a parallel argument on the same thread had fallen into the same trap.
you said ---
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
When someon can't arrgue the point, thay becom the gramer polic.
what is the point then? if it has nothing to do with the argument at hand, then what am i supposed to argue? 😕
i'll be waiting for Breno to refute my interpretation about I Peter 3:7... Breno, prove that i'm out of context...
really funny how you purposely ignore the racist comment though... well, it's a slap on your face, Breno, to be corrected in spelling by a foreigner... 😉
Originally posted by dyajeep
you said ---
what is the point then? if it has nothing to do with the argument at hand, then what am i supposed to argue? 😕
What?! You don't get it?!
Look, if you have a counter argument, you are going to write that argument. If you don't have a counter argument, then you are going to nit-pick on spelling and grimmer. Therefore, if someone is nit-picking on spelling and grimmer, it is because they don't have a counter argument.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Look, if you have a counter argument, you are going to write that argument.
stop.
just stop.
stop your attitude.
listen to reason.
here's my post ---
Originally posted by dyajeep
of course, the person... my point is, it's not wrong to be a gay if you're not doing homosexual acts... i have some friends in our church who are openly gay, i.e. they are attracted to same sex, talks like a girl, moves like a girl... but he never dresses like a girl, does not engage in homosexual relationship and continues his service to God...as to women, i never see the Bible degrade women... by saying women are "weaker vessel" does not equate to "weaker sex" (not as the term we use today like degrading women)... women are weaker so men who are stronger will respect, understand and honor them:
"Husbands, likewise, [b]dwell with them with understanding, giving honor to the wife, as to the weaker vessel
, and as being heirs together of the grace of life, that your prayers may not be hindered."
I Peter 3:7 [/B]
here's Breno's post ---
Originally posted by Breno
You need to go back to bible school. Shouldn't be quoting scriptures unless you understand their context. You could make a fool of yourself and miss enform the needy. Shocking!
what do i need to argue? there's no refute... this is just plain bashing...
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
No, just pointing out that if you are being the grammar police then that is because you don't have a point. I don't have to care about your argument to be able to tell you that.
ok, so being a "grammar police" is a crime now? 🤨
and it's pretty stupid to continue talking to you regarding this... i quote a Bible verse, i was bashed, i corrected a spelling, now i don't have a point, and i'm the bad guy...
thanks, shakya, for proving that... 👆
and your "i'm more intelligent than you because i don't believe in the Bible" attitude should stop... you're being an a$$hole... but if you want to go on like that, no problem - continue with your hypocrisy, buddhist...
Originally posted by dyajeep
ok, so being a "grammar police" is a crime now? 🤨
Originally posted by dyajeep
and it's pretty stupid to continue talking to you regarding this... i quote a Bible verse, i was bashed, i corrected a spelling, now i don't have a point, and i'm the bad guy...
Originally posted by dyajeep
thanks, shakya, for proving that... 👆
Originally posted by dyajeep
and your "i'm more intelligent than you because i don't believe in the Bible" attitude should stop...
Originally posted by dyajeep
you're being an a$$hole... but if you want to go on like that, no problem - continue with your hypocrisy, buddhist...
[quickquote=14919536](auto quote)[/
Wow! Nothing better to do?
Firstly, I wasn't talking about your interpretation of 1 Peter 3:7. I was mainly talking about a previous post by another individual. I responded to you directly after you picked a hole in my ability to spell. However, since you have requested a more learned interpretation of the formentioned scripture I shall endeavour to enlighten you.
In Peter's day an earthen vessel was a highly valued tool and an integral part of day to day living, in much the same way a mains water pipe is for us in our day and age. A wonderful luxury that many of us take for granted. So imagine if your vessel (some of which were 2 metres high) had a few hair line cracks in it, how carful are you going to be with it? You're going to be a bit more gentle with it otherwise what you've put in may not reach it's destination.
So after encouraging the women about the virtues of being submissive. Peter diplomatically and poetically warnes the men that they need to respect their wives if they are to be sure that their prayers will reach their destination unhindered.
Likewise, ye husbands, dwell with them according to knowledge, giving honour unto the wife, as unto the weaker vessel, and as being heirs together of the grace of life; that your prayers be not hindered.
This scripture has nothing to with women being weaker at all, it's an encouragement for men to be stronger. There are so many rubbish translations of the bible around it's no wonder that people don't understand it
Originally posted by dyajeep
you said ---what is the point then? if it has nothing to do with the argument at hand, then what am i supposed to argue? 😕
i'll be waiting for Breno to refute my interpretation about I Peter 3:7... Breno, prove that i'm out of context...
really funny how you purposely ignore the racist comment though... well, it's a slap on your face, Breno, to be corrected in spelling by a foreigner... 😉
[quickquote=14919536](auto quote)[/
Wow! Nothing better to do?
Firstly, I wasn't talking about your interpretation of 1 Peter 3:7. I was mainly talking about a previous post by another individual. I responded to you directly after you picked a hole in my ability to spell. However, since you have requested a more learned interpretation of the formentioned scripture I shall endeavour to enlighten you.
In Peter's day an earthen vessel was a highly valued tool and an integral part of day to day living, in much the same way a mains water pipe is for us in our day and age. A wonderful luxury that many of us take for granted. So imagine if your vessel (some of which were 2 metres high) had a few hair line cracks in it, how carful are you going to be with it? You're going to be a bit more gentle with it otherwise what you've put in may not reach it's destination.
So after encouraging the women about the virtues of being submissive. Peter diplomatically and poetically warnes the men that they need to respect their wives if they are to be sure that their prayers will reach their destination unhindered.
Likewise, ye husbands, dwell with them according to knowledge, giving honour unto the wife, as unto the weaker vessel, and as being heirs together of the grace of life; that your prayers be not hindered.
This scripture has nothing to with women being weaker at all, it's an encouragement for men to be stronger. There are so many rubbish translations of the bible around it's no wonder that people don't understand it
And by the way I am a foreigner too