Originally posted by Lestov16
Then that's a no limits fallacy and the burden of proof is on you to secure it. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. I am not committing a negative proof fallacy. I am basing my decision that they were built for the sole purpose of adapting to and killing mutants. There would obviously be no reason for them to be designed to adapt to anything else. you committing a blatant no limits fallacy by stating they have power beyond that, and the burden of proof is on you to show it.Come back with screenfeats proving they can adapt to things besides mutants, or don't come back at all, fool.
You don't the meaning of a no-limits-fallacy then. Or how the burden to prove something works. Sorry, but spouting fancy debate-related terms you pick up from wikipedia or hear thrown around casually doesn't make you an actual debater.
You're basing your opinion on nothing then. The source of their power, Mystique's genes, wasn't limited to mutants. There is absolutely no precedent to think then that their abilities somehow magically developed said weakness.
Lol, mutants are the only threat which the X-verse humans face. Claiming that the Sentinels abilities are limited based on such a colossal lack of information to back up that stance is saying that nuclear weapons can only harm human beings, because they were designed to kill human beings. Stupid.
Heck, I'll reiterate another point I made; are ordinary, run of the mill Sentinels useless against non-mutants iyo?
Lol, every single goddamned screenfeat supports my point and discounts yours. From carbon-based GORTs to adapt-to-mutant-only Sentinels, you've either outright lied, misrepresented or just made shit up to suit your dumb argument.