Kit Fisto and Agen Kolar vs. Darth Malgus and Exar Kun (sabers only)

Started by carthage4 pages

Tbh they have better dueling feats than Revan.

That's cool. I'm lol'ing at the amount of imbeciles in this thread.

So far, it seems apparent to everyone that I'm insane, yet not one of you can produce any form of decent argument to support that claim.

All Kolar has is being called one of the best in the Order's history.
That's a really good accolade...but not in comparison to Malgus/Kun.
The entire TOR era wasn't even established when the quote was released.
Kolar can be in the Top 200 and still be classified as one of the best.
In comparison, Kun/Malgus are among the Top 20-.

Originally posted by NewGuy01
I am clueless as to why you can't wrap your head around the fact that those who were christened as amongst the greatest swordsmen the Jedi Order has ever produced can stand to those who were christened as the amongst the greatest Dark Lords, especially in a contest of skill.

There's a vast variance in terms of level of those who can claim just an accolade. It isn't a description that miraculously puts them all on the same pedestal.

Even if Kit and Kolar are on par with them in terms of skill, they would still lose by virtue of being significantly less powerful than Malgus and Kun, like with Bane vs Kas'im.

Cool, so Kolar is in the top 200 and Malgus in the top 20. Nice assumptions there. Now back it up idiot.

Originally posted by Nephthys
There's a vast variance in terms of level of those who can claim just an accolade. It isn't a description that miraculously puts them all on the same pedestal.

Even if Kit and Kolar are on par with them in terms of skill, they would still lose by virtue of being significantly less powerful than Malgus and Kun, like with Bane vs Kas'im.

Then it's too bad this match is sabers only.

Originally posted by NewGuy01
Cool, so Kolar is in the top 200 and Malgus in the top 20. Nice assumptions there. Now back it up idiot.

1. Don't insult me and call me an idiot. That's not like you, and just makes you look worse in a thread where everyone is against you.
2. You are doubting Kun/Malgus are among the Top 20? Wut.

Originally posted by NewGuy01
Then it's too bad this match is sabers only.

Bane vs Kas'im was sabers only too, until the end. And Bane was beating Kas'im by virtue of his greater power.

Except that this is a sabers only match purely.

1. Don't insult me and call me an idiot.

You mean like you're doing? Also, I could really care less what you plebs think of me, dude.

2. You are doubting Kun/Malgus are among the Top 20? Wut.

No, I'm pointing out the horrendous flaws in your ridiculous assumptions. Again, Malgus's best feat with a saber was his victory over Ven Zallow--It's impressive because Ven has his fair share of impressive accolades and feats. However, Agen and Kit's feats and accolades are even more impressive than his.

The fact that you deny one of the greatest bladesbeings ever produced by the Jedi Order could challenge Malgus in a duel is beyond me. Sora Bulq could challenge Mace, and he's less skilled than either of these two.

You might need to emphasize the fact that you've never denied that Kun and Malgus could win. You're simply arguing the feats and accolades of the PT jedi are being overlooked due to the rampant fanboyism of Kun/Malgus. Good luck doing that here, lol

Originally posted by carthage
You might need to emphasize the fact that you've never denied that Kun and Malgus [b]could win. You're simply arguing the feats and accolades of the PT jedi are being overlooked due to the rampant fanboyism of Kun/Malgus. Good luck doing that here, lol [/B]

I cannot believe the voice of reason is coming from you of all people.

Why is it amazing coming from me? Try dealing with heretics like Ant and Neph, even a slight suggestion a TOR character can't win exposes tons of ridiculous bias that they accuse me of. Its like they can't accept the fact that Kit and Agen are renowned swordsmen that can put up a fight.

Because reasonability is not usually your strongest suit.

Yeah, it's pretty wired to me too. It's like they understand my argument until it comes to those two, then upon reading their names their brains shut off or something.

Malgus solos what is this?

Originally posted by NewGuy01
Because reasonability is not usually your strongest suit.

Don't tell me you are one of those Kas'sim > Tiin people? 🙁

Being correct and being reasonable are different.

Also, that could very well be true.

Except to claim Kolar is near the likes of Malgus implies Malgus would be hilariously annihilated by Palaptine.

His performance against Palpatine doesn't affect his own accomplishments at all. It's the core of what makes Palpatine's feat infinitely impressive, that's the exact reason why a lot of people think Sidious could simply blitz almost everybody. I personally don't share this belief though.

To me, the entire sequence seemed like bullshit. My best explanation is that the masters had vastly underestimated Palpatine's speed and ferocity, which is why the last master to be assaulted was also the one that lasted the longest. Realisitically it each of them should have fared better, but what's happened has happened.

Except it completely affects his own accomplishments.
Fact is that his only G-Canon appearance depicts him as being totally trashed by Sidious.
You think Malgus will be killed like that? No way.