If Sidious can blitz Kolar, he could do the same to Malgus given the same curcumstances. Because Malgus's saber feats aren't any better than his, and you haven't even argued against it.
You are correc that it is nothing but my personal belief that in a normal situation, and if the B-Team used their numbers in an effective manner rather than being picked off one by one, they should be capable of putting up no less of a fight than Maul and Savage did. However, make no mistake, it is *because* of this belief that I also believe Malgus/co. should be able to do the same.
No way. How can you actually believe this?
I personally don't, actually, but I can easily make that argument and I'm not sure how you'd viably disprove it.
Tol Bragga could hold his ground in a fight with Malgus, just like Ven Zallow already did--No one can deny this. Yet Agen Kolar, who has everything those two have to their names and better, somehow cannot? That is the epitome of bullshit.
You're referring to his power boost after killing Aleema? That surely boosted his power, and perhaps his speed and strength as well, but it didn't make a considerable difference in his performance against Aryn as far as the dueling portion went.
If you're referring to some massive jump in skill between Decieved and his days as the false Emperor, then you have earned nothing but my amusement. Nothing indicates that.
Originally posted by Lord Stark
This is true. But honestly speaking by TOR Malgus is superior to Dooku, and the idea that Dooku would get lol blitzed by Palpatine is ludicrous.
He's better than Dooku, who was outpacing both Anakin and Kenobi, practically treating Kenobi as a non-factor in "The Lost one?"
Originally posted by SIDIOUS 66
He's better than Dooku, who was outpacing both Anakin and Kenobi, practically treating Kenobi as a non-factor in "The Lost one?"
I know that's what I mean. And shit both Anakin and Kenobi by this point could defeat both Fisto and Agen at the same time. So even if we lowball Malgus considerably he should still solo this match.
Originally posted by SIDIOUS 66
Kenobi couldn't defeat Agen and Kit at the same time. Anakin? Possibly, depending on the circumstance.
Yes he could. Filoni blatantly says Savage Opress performance against Sidious far outstripped the Jedi Council's. Kenobi took on Maul and Savage on and won, Kit and Agen are vastly inferior to Savage and Maul.
And no, I wanting to know why you put Malgus above Dooku in sabers. [/B]
I don't.
Originally posted by Lord Stark
Yes he could. Filoni blatantly says Savage Opress performance against Sidious far outstripped the Jedi Council's. Kenobi took on Maul and Savage on and won, Kit and Agen are vastly inferior to Savage and Maul.I don't.
Filoni also depicted Sidious as playing around and not trying to kill Maul. Lucas didn't have Sidious fighting the council members with the same demeanor.
Not to mention Filoni also made a direct comparison between the brothers and Yoda, stating that Yoda barely survived a confrontation with Sidious.
Originally posted by SIDIOUS 66
Filoni also depicted Sidious as playing around and not trying to kill Maul. Lucas didn't have Sidious fighting the council members with the same demeanor.
Which means nothing, his performance is still far better. Filoni himself confirms this. Its backed by Kit Fisto, the best on the team getting owned by an early CWs Ventress who in turn is inferior to Savage.
Not to mention Filoni also made a direct comparison between the brothers and Yoda, stating that Yoda barely survived a confrontation with Sidious.
What's the exact quote? And what does this prove?