Forest Gump vs John McClane

Originally posted by Robtard
Repeat: McClane's ability to KO a man with a single punch. Die Hard 5.

Repeat: McClane's damage-soak > Gump's damage output

Repeat: If you watched the DH films you'd know what ridiculous damage McClane has survived.

Nah. McClane takes this one.

Prove it.

I have also seen how he survives and it isn't hand to hand prowess.

Context, Roberta.

Originally posted by Robtard
Go on...

Originally posted by quanchi112
And we have seen him in multiple fights and only once able to ko a man with a punch. A very low percentage not even close to the norm.

Prove it.

I have also seen how he survives and it isn't hand to hand prowess.

Context, Roberta.

Repeat: McClane's ability to KO a man with a single punch. Die Hard 5.

Repeat: McClane's damage-soak > Gump's damage output

Repeat: If you watched the DH films you'd know what ridiculous damage McClane has survived.

Nah. McClane takes this one.

Originally posted by RJ 2.0
Hey, I have an idea, let's talk about who Gump fought.

John

Originally posted by Robtard
Repeat: McClane's ability to KO a man with a single punch. Die Hard 5.

Repeat: McClane's damage-soak > Gump's damage output

Repeat: If you watched the DH films you'd know what ridiculous damage McClane has survived.

Nah. McClane takes this one.

Prove it.

I have which is why I ask.

No, he loses to Gump.

Originally posted by The Manga Guru
John

Originally posted by RJ 2.0

Repeat: McClane's ability to KO a man with a single punch. Die Hard 5.

Repeat: McClane's damage-soak > Gump's damage output

Repeat: If you watched the DH films you'd know what ridiculous damage McClane has survived.

Nah. McClane takes this one.

Originally posted by Robtard
Repeat: McClane's ability to KO a man with a single punch. Die Hard 5.

Repeat: McClane's damage-soak > Gump's damage output

Repeat: If you watched the DH films you'd know what ridiculous damage McClane has survived.

Nah. McClane takes this one.

Originally posted by quanchi112
So it took five movies to oneshot one guy without any feats under his belt.

Prove it.

I have which is why I ask.

No, he loses to Gump.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Gump wins.

Originally posted by quanchi112
One rebuttal of reason to counter one rage loop.

Repeat: McClane's ability to KO a man with a single punch. Die Hard 5.

Repeat: McClane's damage-soak > Gump's damage output

Repeat: If you watched the DH films you'd know what ridiculous damage McClane has survived.

Nah. McClane takes this one.

Originally posted by Robtard
Repeat: McClane's ability to KO a man with a single punch. Die Hard 5.

Repeat: McClane's damage-soak > Gump's damage output

Repeat: If you watched the DH films you'd know what ridiculous damage McClane has survived.

Nah. McClane takes this one.

Originally posted by quanchi112
So it took five movies to oneshot one guy without any feats under his belt.

Prove it.

I have which is why I ask.

No, he loses to Gump.

Why you ignore me?

Originally posted by The Manga Guru
What has Gump done that puts him above John.

Originally posted by quanchi112
One rebuttal of reason to counter one rage loop.

"irony"

Repeat: McClane's ability to KO a man with a single punch. Die Hard 5.

Repeat: McClane's damage-soak > Gump's damage output

Repeat: If you watched the DH films you'd know what ridiculous damage McClane has survived.

Nah. McClane takes this one.

Originally posted by quanchi112
He wins here. Unlike John Gump doesn't need guns and luck to even the odds.

Originally posted by quanchi112
It is about a matchup problem.

Originally posted by Robtard
Repeat: McClane's ability to KO a man with a single punch. Die Hard 5.

Repeat: McClane's damage-soak > Gump's damage output

Repeat: If you watched the DH films you'd know what ridiculous damage McClane has survived.

Nah. McClane takes this one.

Originally posted by quanchi112
So it took five movies to oneshot one guy without any feats under his belt.

Prove it.

I have which is why I ask.

No, he loses to Gump.

Originally posted by RJ 2.0
Epic dodge. Concession accepted.