First off: I'm not making an argument. I'm questioning your judgement.
... by forming an argument. 👆
Secondly: Sometimes it is important to put things into context. In this case, a simple look at the history of Freedon Nadd within the sourcebooks reveals the following:"He [Nadd] would return, he knew. He only needed time to become the greatest Sith sorcerer that had ever existed, and then he would return to take his revenge on the Jedi. - Tales of the Jedi Companion.
Emphasis mine. It doesn't make sense to assume that Nadd ignored everything that would aid him in his original quest.
What a laughable argument. I never claimed "Nadd ignored everything" in regards to ritual. That's utterly absurd.
I did state, however, that nothing says he knew close to the sorcery knowledge that Revan has. Which is true. Get over it.
You're literally arguing an "all or nothing" thing here. Nadd either completely ignored Sith rituals or mastered every technique.
🙄 Why can't he just have a respectable knowledge on the subject?
tl;dr: the fact Nadd wanted to be the greatest sorcerer ever doesn't mean he set out to discover every known Sith ritual.
"After his death, Sadow's screts were gained by Freedon Nadd, who passed them on to Exar Kun. Because none of them came to a glorious end, I think it's best that I guard Sadow's teachings a bit longer. However, I am tempted to incorporate some of his findings into my own book, The Creation of Monsters. - Darth Sidious, Jedi vs. Sith: The Essential Guide to the Force, p.175Emphasis mine. Not only does Sidious confirm that the knowledge was passed on from Sadow to Nadd (and then to Kun). He also states he wanted to use the knowledge in a book specifically dealing with Sith sorcery / alchemy.
What the hell is you with "emphasis mine"?
I never denied that Nadd had an extensive understanding on Sith Sorcery. That's fairly ****ing obvious that all the Ancient Sith Lords did.
I, however, rejected the notion that he's better than Revan, whose knowledge on Sith Sorcery was so great that it was more than an entire library of books.
So no, the fact Palpatine wanted to include Nadd's findings (well, Sadow's that Nadd simply learned) in one book is not even close to a valid argument of his superiority to Revan.
tl;dr: the fact Palpatine wanted to write a part of his book about Sadow's findings doesn't mean they are better than Revan, whose knowledge fills hundreds of books.
Again. A little bit of thinking on your side or applying context would be appreciated. Sadow and Kressh were rivals even before becoming contestants for the mantle of the Dark Lord. If Kressh's mastery of alchemy / sorcery had given him an decisive advantage over Sadow, he would have capitalized on it. Nothing like that happens, which leads to the suggestion that Sadow had methods to counter any sorcery-based advantage that Kressh could come up with.
Man, it's almost as if there is an example in Star Wars already that has the opposite of what you're saying...
mmm
Oh right, Karness Muur and Sorzus Syn.
Sorzus Syn created an uber powerful amulet (just like Ludo Kressh did) and gave it to Karness Muur since he requested it.
"Karness Muur requested I create this, but it shall be my triumph. My experimentation with the Heart of Graush and my alchemic
mastery of raising Sithspawn will culminate in the first Great Amulet to be worn by one of the Lords of the Sith." (Book of the Sith, 26)
Syn was, clearly, ahead of all the other ancients on the field of alchemy / sorcery. Muur wasn't even capable of making his own talisman.
Nevertheless, Muur, like Sadow, was still extremely proficient in alchemy / sorcery, capable of even creating leviathans.
Just look at the ****er Muur made. ^
Muur was the more powerful of the two (he was compared to Palpatine by Darth Vader and was more powerful than vong-invested Darth Krayt).
Just like Sadow was greater than Kressh in the Force, but nevertheless they were still rivals (just like Muur and Syn).
Hopefully you can see where I'm going with this:
Syn, who explicitly plotted Muur's downfall, was unable to capitalize on her noticeable advantage on another proficient sorcerer who also happened to be more powerful than her.
So no, given history has given us an explicit example of what you said couldn't happen, it's total bullshit to suggest Kressh and Sadow were equal to each other on that field if nothing states it.
tl;dr: Kressh and Sadow can be rivals without them being equals on the playing field of sorcery / alchemy.
Furthermore you're still ignoring Sadow's status as one of the most powerful Sith sorcerers in history
Uh, Nai, everyone we are discussing about in this thread qualifies as "one of the most powerful Sith sorcerers in history." 😬
and still haven't provided anything to suggest that Revan even remotely compares to him.
🙄 Actually, it's the opposite. I presented my case - you haven't been doing good on yours, rofl.
Revan knowing...
a.) everything on Malachor V
b.) studying Korriban extensively
c.) studying Nathema extensively
d.) the thought bomb
e.) the planet-wide fire ritual
f.) the immortality Nathema ritual
g.) more than the Sith Academy's entire archives
h.) how to create dark side aberrations
...is my argument.
👆 And, when I compare that to Sadow's, I find Revan more knowledgeable.
tl;dr: Revan's knowledge is more impressive than Sadow's storehouse of information on Yavin IV.
You know: Sadow is the guy who invented a ship with a force based weapon capable of making stars go supernova by pulling their cores out.
Eh? To my knowledge, all Sadow did is imbue the ship with a lot of Sith crystals that affected the star and amplified his powers. It's not like he built a Force-version of the Death Star.
Give me a call when Revan comes up with something compareable.
Eh, I'm pretty sure Revan can stick massive crystals inside of star ships.
It is "massive speculation" that an individual that was heralded as the greatest student the Jedi have seen from the start of their order to his arrival, did learn everything from them that he could?"In fact, all the instructors and all the other apprentices had commented on his proficiency and his ability to assimilate th
e lore and techniques presented to him." - Tales of the Jedi Companion.
When he departs from Ossus, it is noted that "the Jedi Masters were weaker than he was". And it is also noted that he needed to turn to a different source of knowledge, since the Jedi couldn't offer him more:
[i]"But he [Nadd] needed to learn more about the Force, needeed to possess more power than the Jedi. From all of his studies he knew of only one source that would readily accept his apprenticeship and teach him to wield the Force wiht impunity...the Sith." - Tales of the Jedi Companion
And there still are those abilities hidden in Holocron and tomes... wink
Erm, the fact Nadd was extremely gifted doesn't mean he learned everything, that's a ridiculous argument.
It should come at no surprise Nadd was more powerful than the Jedi Masters. 😬 His potential was far greater, no shit.
The quotes you provided aren't credible. They seem to be heavily tainted by looking at things from Nadd's perspective. 😬
tl;dr: It's speculation to assume he knew everything on Ossus. Wait, no, it's outright retarded based on the limited quotes you given.